Policy

Facebook whistleblower Sophie Zhang has a message for the tech press, too

Zhang came forward with allegations against Facebook long before Frances Haugen. So how come it took so long for people to listen?

Sophie Zhang and her cat

"Ultimately, I would prefer to stay home and pet my cats," said Sophie Zhang.

Photo: Sophie Zhang

Somewhere along the line, Sophie Zhang got cast as whistleblower No. 2 in the Facebook drama — which is sort of funny when you consider that Zhang, a former data scientist at the company, alleged back in April that Facebook was turning a blind eye to international election interference in a series of Guardian articles. And those interviews came more than six months after a version of her now-infamous goodbye memo, in which she said she had "blood on [her] hands," was leaked to and published by BuzzFeed News.

All of that was well before the woman now known as the Facebook whistleblower, Frances Haugen, came forward with explosive allegations of her own about Facebook's impact on kids and democracy. Haugen's methodically managed revelations landed her an interview on "60 Minutes" and a seat before a Senate committee whose members hung on her every word. Zhang's revelations ... didn't. At least, not then.

But Haugen's debut has stirred up a new round of interest in what Zhang has to say. On Monday, she'll testify before the U.K. Parliament, and when we spoke, Zhang said I was one of six interviews she had that day.

It's not that the sudden interest and earlier disparity in attention bothers Zhang, a self-described introvert who said she prefers the attention of her cat. But it hasn't gone unnoticed by her either. For Zhang, the fact that her leaked memo got more attention than the substantive claims she laid out in the Guardian, complete with documentation, suggests that Facebook isn't the only one capitalizing on outrage — the people covering and attempting to regulate it are too.

But Zhang is not laying blame at their feet. "This is the world social media has built," she said.

Zhang spoke with me about her second turn in the spotlight, what her life has been like since first telling her story and why, if she could go back, she would unwrite that memo.

This interview has been edited and condensed.

Tell me a little bit about what motivated you to have this second "Here I am, World" moment.

It's not really what motivated me, so much as what motivated others. I've been saying the same thing for the past half-year. I testified to the European Parliament a year ago at this point. I think it's more a statement of how people follow the public zeitgeist.

So what about this moment, or Frances and her disclosures, do you think captured the public attention? And I'm obviously counting myself as part of that.

It's probably a statement on both the fact that she's not an extreme introvert, and the fact that she probably has a great PR team supporting her. I am certainly not a PR expert, and I've been doing everything myself.

How does that feel for you?

I'm sure it took a lot of bravery on her part. Some people have been upset on my behalf. But frankly, I'm happy for her to have that attention if that's what she wants. Ultimately, I would prefer to stay home and pet my cats.

I always felt that I was the wrong person for this role, and I was speaking out in spite of that, and I'm frankly glad someone else more suited for it is coming forward and also accomplished in the way Frances is. I'm not as good at speaking in a way that grabs attention. That's my great self-assessment.

The "blood on my hands" thing grabbed a lot of attention.

When you stay up all night to write something that you did not expect to go public, you may regret certain turns of phrase.

Do you think the press has a little bit fallen into the trap that you found Facebook falling into, which is to have this U.S.-centric focus on, for instance, Frances' disclosures about Instagram Kids in the U.S.? Whereas your disclosures were about foreign countries.

I thought that up until I released the part about the United States, and people didn't care about that either. I think it's more a statement of my not having the right sense of the public zeitgeist, not having been more photogenic and/or polished, and frankly I should probably have hired a PR agency at the start and not tried to do everything myself. That was not a good decision.

How have these months since going public felt for you?

It's certainly been stressful, but my cat and my girlfriend keep me sane.

Have you started a job search process, or are you thinking about that?

I don't think it's appropriate for me to have a job right now while I'm doing press. It would be unfair to any employers. It's not a very nice "Thank you for giving me a job." I do want to get a job, eventually. If nothing else, it will be a convenient excuse for me to tell reporters I'm not talking to them anymore.

You had a bad experience working for a large tech company. Is that something that you would stay away from in the future?

The thing is that I can only use my expertise at a large tech company, realistically. Ultimately, I'll end up weighing a lot of factors, and I don't want to tell you something I haven't figured out myself.

Are there things you wish you did differently, either to protect yourself or to get your message out?

I wish I would have done the goodbye memo differently. I don't think anyone would like to be defined by something they wrote in a last-minute decision during an all-nighter. Everyone writes about it, even when I come forward with more important details afterward.

What I was most upset by was the way it furthered misinformation in some areas. For instance, I had used the word "actor" to describe, for instance, bad actors. The Indian press took that and ran with it and suddenly there was an article that I had caught Bollywood red-handed.

Knowing what I know now, I don't know if I would have even published it in the first place. Because I was speaking to a specific audience, and it was spread to the whole world without the necessary context.

And I would have gotten PR advice from the start.

It's interesting because you're sort of a poster child for whistleblowers now, and...

I mean, I think frankly Frances Haugen is the poster child now. It's a bit funny, I've seen articles describing myself as a "second whistleblower" or something like that.

Obviously, some part of whistleblowing involves gathering documentation and leaking internal stuff. I wonder how you think about how whistleblowers can both protect the anonymity and the privacy and the personal discussions of people inside these companies, while also making sure that these problems are unearthed?

That's an approach both Frances and I have taken, to redact the names and details of the people involved. The question of what documentation to go public with, I chose to only go public about areas that I personally worked on, that I was personally involved in.

There was criticism within Facebook for instance, that [whistleblowers] were anonymous or that they were looking for publicity and personal gain, or that they were speaking about subjects they had no knowledge about, or they would create a chilling effect on the internal discussion. I made the conscious decision to intentionally avoid all these criticisms of whistleblowing and essentially be the perfect model, according to Facebook's standards, and of course, it did not work.

[In a statement regarding Zhang and her accusations, a Facebook spokesperson said: "While we think it's critical that we're held to account, we also think it's important to add context about the work that different teams do and respond when the work of thousands of people at Facebook is being mischaracterized."]

Frances Haugen testified about there being "integrity holdouts" at Facebook, which are users who don't get protections from the company's civic integrity protection to see what happens. You replied to one of my tweets about this and said something about how there are advertising holdouts too. Can you tell me more about that?

The company wants to know the very long-term impacts of advertising on retention and usage for Facebook. If it turns out that these people use Facebook much more, that's useful and interesting information for them. The argument was usually that we need to know what the impact of this is. We need to know if people like it or not. But this is also motivated by wanting to know the impact for growth.

So, I'm going to give you an example: My day job was fake likes and interactions. When someone fake-likes or follows you, that also creates a notification. The thinking on the growth team was that [suppressing notifications] was negatively impacting our numbers, and we should not be doing this. For example, with spamming, someone can essentially conduct spam by giving themselves a creative name, like, "Go to my profile to get your free iPhone," and [then] follow lots of random people. Of course their profile will contain a link to a complete scam. This is not a very useful interaction for people.

The question is: When we stop this, is this negatively impacting our numbers, and if so, how much is it by? So in that case, we did an experiment where we did not stop fake accounts from following some people to see if there was any difference in user activity. Surprisingly, in that case, there wasn't.

[Facebook declined to comment on Zhang's description.]

Is there anything from Frances' testimony that stuck out to you as particularly noteworthy?

Most of her testimony didn't surprise me. I think our core points are the same: that Facebook is ultimately a profit-driven company. That will not be controversial at all, but Facebook is still trying to deny it. Of course it's a for-profit company. The issue is that the company portrays itself as very nice, and with the mission of an institution that's trying to change the world. And the issue when you portray yourself as that is, some of your employees will actually believe that.

Fintech

Plaid is striking back after Stripe entered its core business

Onboarding customers through identity verification and ACH transfers is a hot sector in fintech, and the two fast-growing fintechs are set to battle it out.

Plaid is looking to help banks and fintech companies with anything related to the onboarding of a customer onto a financial product, said Plaid CTO Jean-Denis Greze.

Photo: Plaid

Plaid is moving into identity verification in a crucial expansion beyond its roots connecting banks and fintechs — a move that could put it in more direct competition with Stripe, another company known for its financial software tools.

In conjunction with its Plaid Forum customer conference this week, the company is also announcing two products focused on ACH transfers as it moves into payments.

Keep Reading Show less
Tomio Geron

Tomio Geron ( @tomiogeron) is a San Francisco-based reporter covering fintech. He was previously a reporter and editor at The Wall Street Journal, covering venture capital and startups. Before that, he worked as a staff writer at Forbes, covering social media and venture capital, and also edited the Midas List of top tech investors. He has also worked at newspapers covering crime, courts, health and other topics. He can be reached at tgeron@protocol.com or tgeron@protonmail.com.

Sponsored Content

Foursquare data story: leveraging location data for site selection

We take a closer look at points of interest and foot traffic patterns to demonstrate how location data can be leveraged to inform better site selecti­on strategies.

Imagine: You’re the leader of a real estate team at a restaurant brand looking to open a new location in Manhattan. You have two options you’re evaluating: one site in SoHo, and another site in the Flatiron neighborhood. Which do you choose?

Keep Reading Show less
Workplace

Getting reproductive benefits at work could be a privacy nightmare

A growing number of tech companies are extending abortion-related travel benefits. Given privacy and legal fears, will employees be too scared to use them?

How employers can implement and discuss reproductive benefits in a way that puts employees at ease.

Photo: Sigrid Gombert via Getty Images

It’s about to be a lot harder to get an abortion in the United States. For many, it’s already hard. The result is that employers, including large companies, are being called upon to fill the abortion care gap. The likelihood of a Roe v. Wade reversal was the push some needed to extend benefits, with Microsoft and Tesla announcing abortion-related travel reimbursements in recent weeks. But the privacy and legal risks facing people in need of abortions loom large. If people have reason to fear texting friends for abortion resources, will they really want to confide in their company?

An employee doesn’t have “much to worry about” when it comes to health privacy, said employee benefits consultant Jessica Du Bois. “The HR director or whoever's in charge of the benefits program is not going to be sharing that information.” Employers have a duty to protect employee health data under HIPAA and a variety of state laws. Companies with self-funded health plans — in other words, most large companies — can see every prescription and service an employee receives. But the data is deidentified.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Enterprise

VMware CEO Raghu Raghuram: Edge is growing faster than cloud

The now-standalone company is staking its immediate future on the multicloud era of IT and hybrid work, while anticipating increased demand for edge-computing software.

VMware CEO Raghu Raghuram spoke with Protocol about the company's future.

Photo: VMware

Nearly a year into his tenure as CEO, Raghu Raghuram believes VMware is well-positioned for the third phase of its evolution, but acknowledges its product transformation still needs some work.

The company, which pioneered the hypervisor and expanded to virtualized networking and storage with its vSphere operating environment, now is helping customers navigate a distributed, multicloud world and hybrid work with newfound freedom as an independent company after being spun off from Dell Technologies last November.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Workplace

What’s wrong with current Big Tech HBCU partnerships

Big Tech is still trying to crack the code on hiring more Black workers despite years of partnerships with HBCUs.

Pictured is the first cohort in Accenture's Level Up program.

Photo: Accenture

As a business major at Prairie View A&M University in Prairie View, Texas, Sean Johnson had been on track to work in finance after graduating. But then his adviser mentioned a program that the historically Black university had with Accenture and Microsoft that was meant to function as a direct pipeline from Prairie View into roles in tech. It changed his entire career course.

Johnson had always had an interest in tech, and the prospect of being able to get a glimpse into the industry, as well as gain real, hands-on experience, appealed to him. By the end of the program, he had a full-time job offer at Accenture.

Keep Reading Show less
Amber Burton

Amber Burton (@amberbburton) is a reporter at Protocol. Previously, she covered personal finance and diversity in business at The Wall Street Journal. She earned an M.S. in Strategic Communications from Columbia University and B.A. in English and Journalism from Wake Forest University. She lives in North Carolina.

Latest Stories
Bulletins