Policy

California gig workers say Prop. 22 isn’t delivering promised benefits

The gig-economy companies want to use Prop. 22 as a model in keeping workers as independent contractors.

Gig workers hold a sign in a crosswalk outside Uber headquarters in San Francisco.

Gig workers in California want companies to automatically provide health care stipends to those who work the required number of hours.

Photo: Megan Rose Dickey/Protocol

When Instacart sent Saori Okawa an email saying she was eligible to apply for a health care stipend, the delivery driver had been expecting it.

Instacart and other gig-economy companies had spent $224 million urging voters to pass Proposition 22, with a key message that it would give workers employee-like benefits while keeping their status as independent contractors. The companies viewed the ballot measure as critical for their businesses, the only realistic way of staving off AB 5, a California law that strictly limits when companies can hire workers as contractors.

Now, as Congress considers the PRO Act, a measure that would use some aspects of AB 5 in considering whether workers can unionize, some couriers and drivers in California are protesting Prop. 22, saying the actual benefits they're getting fall far short of what was promised.

Okawa submitted her documents but was rejected because she's already insured through Medi-Cal. Prop. 22 does clearly state that stipends only apply to those who purchase policies through Covered California, but Okawa said the Prop. 22 advertisements were misleading.

"During the Prop. 22 campaign, they said if you're working a minimum of 25 hours that they were going to give [the stipend]," she said. "They didn't say it only applies to this or that."

She and dozens of other gig workers staged a protest, organized by We Drive Progress, Mobile Workers Alliance and SEIU 1021, outside Uber's new offices in San Francisco to demand that companies automatically provide health insurance stipends to all workers who meet the minimum time requirements. Under Prop. 22, companies can make gig workers apply for the benefits.

Okawa has worked for Uber, Instacart and DoorDash over the years, but spends the bulk of her time working for Instacart, she said. Okawa, an immigrant from Japan, said many of her friends in gig work are also immigrants, and either have Medi-Cal or no insurance at all.

If she were to receive the stipend, Okawa said, she would then be able to afford to get a commercial policy through Covered California's marketplace, which could offer better coverage.

Gig workers hold a sign at a protest in San Francisco. Saori Okawa (left) with a fellow gig worker at the rally in San Francisco.Photo: Megan Rose Dickey/Protocol

"A lot of times, my Medi-Cal has a lot of restrictions on the doctors," she said. "So I would like to look into better insurance if there is one. And if [companies] are helping. A lot of times we're not making a lot of money."

Jorge Orantes, a ride-hail driver for Uber and Lyft, who is currently uninsured, would like to get health insurance through Covered California but cannot currently afford it, he told Protocol. He'd also like the provision of a stipend to be automatic.

"We want our stipend that they promised to us," he said.

During the Prop. 22 campaign, critics pointed out that the promised stipend would be difficult to qualify for. Workers would have to purchase a Covered California policy in advance, then hope that they made enough hours to qualify for the stipend, which would cover 82% of the cost of a typical policy known as Bronze coverage. If their hours slipped, they would still have to pay the full cost of the premium.

In March, Instacart said 12% of California shoppers were eligible for the health care subsidy, which meant they had worked more than an average of 15 hours per week in the fourth quarter of 2020. Of those eligible, Instacart said 25% requested and received the subsidy. That resulted in Instacart spending $2.2 million on health care subsidies.

Uber says the goal of the stipend is to "provide the drivers and delivery people who don't already have health insurance a path to access coverage," spokesperson Kayla Whaling told Protocol.

Whaling pointed to a recent survey, commissioned by Uber, that shows 89% of drivers already get health insurance from another source. So far, 14% of drivers have qualified and signed up to receive health care stipends. But another survey, commissioned by SEIU 721, found that many drivers don't understand how to receive the health care stipend from companies. It also found that 62% of drivers do not believe Prop. 22 has made it easier to receive health insurance benefits.

DoorDash said it's proud of the benefits Prop. 22 has been able to provide to workers, a spokesperson told Protocol.

"Since Prop. 22's passage, we've worked hard to educate Dashers on these new benefits and ensure the process to access the health care stipend for those who qualify is quick and easy," the spokesperson said.

The Protect App-Based Drivers And Services Coalition, which consists of Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, Instacart and Postmates, echoed that sentiment. Geoff Vetter, a spokesperson for the coalition, said that companies have "extensively communicated with drivers" about their benefits, how to qualify for the stipend and how to apply for it.

The issues with Prop. 22-style benefits could spread if other states adopt similar measures. In an earnings call with investors, Lyft CEO Logan Green said Prop. 22 "can provide a model for other states." Lyft formed a Super PAC, Illinoisans for Independent Work, which is making similar promises of preserving "independence" and "flexibility" for gig workers.

But, according to workers at the Tuesday rally in San Francisco, companies have not clearly communicated how to get the benefits that came along with Prop. 22's flexibility.

"We are here today because we want our health care," Orantes said. "They said we'd get health care, but they don't give us anything."

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.
Policy

How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.
Fintech

How I decided to exit my startup’s original business

Bluevine got its start in factoring invoices for small businesses. CEO Eyal Lifshitz explains why it dropped that business in favor of “end-to-end banking.”

"[I]t was a realization that we can't be successful at both at the same time: You've got to choose."

Photo: Bluevine

Click banner image for more How I decided series

Bluevine got its start in fintech by offering a modern version of invoice factoring, the centuries-old practice where businesses sell off their accounts receivable for up-front cash. It’s raised $240 million in venture capital and about $700 million in total financing since its founding in 2013 by serving small businesses. But along the way, it realized it was better to focus on the checking accounts and lines of credit it provided customers than its original product. It now manages some $500 million in checking-account deposits.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Enterprise

The Roe decision could change how advertisers use location data

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restricting use of location data. But that may be changing.

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restrictions on the use of location data. But that may be changing.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on Friday, the likelihood for location data to be used against people suddenly shifted from a mostly hypothetical scenario to a realistic threat. Although location data has a variety of purposes — from helping municipalities assess how people move around cities to giving reliable driving directions — it’s the voracious appetite of digital advertisers for location information that has fueled the creation and growth of a sector selling data showing who visited specific points on the map, when, what places they came from and where they went afterwards.

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restrictions on the use of location data. But that may be changing. The overturning of Roe not only puts the wide availability of location data for advertising in the spotlight, it could serve as a turning point compelling the digital ad industry to take action to limit data associated with sensitive places before the government does.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins