How Google interns fought for more cash — and won

After a petition and help from the Alphabet Workers Union, Google BOLD interns convinced the company to give them a $5,000 stipend for housing and other needs.

A Google office in London

Google BOLD interns successfully petitioned for a stipend for housing and other needs.

Photo: Future Publishing/Getty Images

Tyrese Thomas and Jacob Ngai were thrilled when they learned that they'd been offered places in the Google BOLD internship program for summer 2021. The program would place them at one of the world's most famous companies, giving them a summer job that pays an intern salary equal to more than $50,000 a year full-time. They were less excited to realize that their salary wouldn't include one of the most famous Google perks — a relocation stipend up to $11,000.

Ngai and Thomas took the internships anyway. Negotiating changes in an intern contract at a world-famous company is just not something most students do. And Google BOLD is a renowned internship program: It's designed to expose undergraduates to careers in tech who wouldn't normally have access to the industry, and it provides tons of perks and benefits, including health benefits, hardware, a $1,000 technology stipend and the all-important, extremely common "return offer" to a full-time job post-graduation.

Google wasn't planning to provide the housing stipend to the 2021 intern cohort because the program is fully remote this year due to COVID-19. Participating students will not need to relocate to and find housing in the extremely expensive Bay Area market. That made sense to Thomas, Ngai and the rest of the interns at first ... but as the summer drew closer, many of these interns started to worry.

Google explicitly seeks candidates from lower socioeconomic backgrounds for the BOLD internship, including first-generation college students and other people who might otherwise have a harder time working their way into the elite Google culture. Many students within this group have less-stable financial and home lives. As the pandemic has made clear, people who don't have their own room to work in, can't afford their own housing, battle with inconsistent Wi-Fi or have to help with childcare, will have a harder time performing well remotely, meaning that the lack of a housing stipend could be a serious problem.

"I live in a small two-bedroom apartment with my parents and brother, and I'm sharing a room with my brother. I'm battling some financial hardship. My mother got laid off due to COVID, and we have constant Wi-Fi issues," Ngai said. "I originally intended to use the internship salary to pay down my student loans, but I also knew I would need to get my own place to find a more productive work environment." He felt that he needed the stipend, and felt that Google must care enough about its interns that it might actually do something if his recruiters realized he wasn't alone in his position.

Ngai and a group chat of roughly 60 other incoming interns started to play with the idea that they could petition Google to reinstate the funds. Google eventually agreed that the interns needed the money, and the company added a $5,000 stipend for all potential needs to their intern offers in mid-April.

But getting there required help from a group that's becoming increasingly powerful within Google: the Alphabet Workers Union.

The first few drafts of the petition to ask for the stipend were popular with the intern group initially, but in general, the students were terrified of actually putting their names on any kind of ask. They didn't want Google to see them as ungrateful, or risk the company interpreting their involvement as the kind of rebellious behavior that might hurt their chances of an "ask-back" for a full-time job. Many of them would rather take the financial hit — they would do anything to get the chance to work for Google and stay there.

"A lot of us were really fearful. As we were sending updates to the broader task force, so to speak, a lot of people backed out because they were really fearful of retaliation at Google. They wanted to get a return offer for this to be their full-time job after graduation," Thomas said.

Ngai wondered if there might be another way into solving the problem, and so he sought out Raksha Muthukumar, one of the more vocal organizers involved in the Alphabet Workers Union.

The union steps in

Since its launch, the AWU has become a bit like a second, pro-employee human resources department within Google, a true worker advocacy organization. According to Muthukumar, Googlers who are non-union members reach out to the AWU with specific asks like this one every couple of weeks, and the union steps in to help escalate worker complaints, give legal advice, teach people about safe advocacy and provide other forms of support. In this case, Muthukumar helped review the petition letter; got Ngai, Thomas and the other core group of intern organizers a conversation with a union lawyer about their legal rights as interns; and, most importantly, helped them figure out how to persuade the other interns it would be safe to sign the petition.

The message they landed on was that Google really does care about its interns. "The BOLD internship, it's the most diverse, it's the most inclusive. One of the biggest things that I said to all of these other interns when I was trying to get their support, was that we just need to tell them that we are going through this. There's no harm in that," Thomas said. "The proposal itself is just a simple, very valid ask: We're showing them with the proposal that this is something that affects a lot of interns."

Before the union helped them send their petition — a four-page document, loaded with individual interns' stories about personal hardships and comparisons to other company salaries and stipends — another intern shared their work with some Google employees, who created their own internal petition and gathered thousands of signatures from inside the company.

"Within two or three days we got over 1,500 signatures from full-time Googlers. It was insane to hear from everyone else that we did gain so much traction in such a short amount of time. We felt really good about actually getting some money," Ngai said. The other interns "were a bit skeptical to begin with, but once we had this support, it was like OK, we're for sure getting the money. Everyone understood that this is an actual issue."

That's how Google saw it, too. In mid-April, all of the BOLD interns got a second, amended offer. "To be clear, we didn't reinstate the relocation allowance since the interns were not asked to relocate in 2021," Google told Protocol. "This year, in total, we provided a $5,000 stipend for interns to use however they deem best, including improving their WFH experience (e.g. new desk, equipment, furnishings). This stipend was distributed to all interns globally as part of our plan to accelerate 2022 benefits to better support our intern community."

"It does come down to how the DEI conversation is actually happening in the tech industry. Are we actually giving people the things that they need, or just saying it?" Muthukumar said. "Not everybody was a California [or] New York-raised tech person."

Thomas and Ngai are still worried that this could make Google rethink any potential full-time job offer. "This isn't coming from a place of admonition. We're there because we enjoy tech and creativity. We want to be a part of not only helping facilitate these processes, but also revolutionizing and making them more sustainable and equitable," Thomas said. "I hope Google can be cognizant of that duality of thought."

If you search "Wordle" on the App Store right now, you'll find nearly a dozen copycat versions of the game.
Screenshot: Nick Statt/Protocol

On this episode of the Source Code podcast: Nick Statt joins the show to discuss the rise of Wordle, the subsequent rise of the Wordle clones, and why it’s so easy to copy a game. Then Ben Pimentel chats about the fight over Web3, why Jack Dorsey and Marc Andreessen are at odds, and the killer app for the future of the web. Finally, Allison Levitsky explains some of the big new future-of-work trends, including the four-day workweek and dog-walker perks.

For more on the topics in this episode:

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Greg Petraetis, SVP and Managing Director, Midmarket and Partner Ecosystem, North America at SAP

As businesses grow during the pandemic, they also encounter pressing challenges to maintain that success. Among them is the pressure to strengthen their digital backbone, which leads to the question: How can companies find the ideal technology provider suited to their evolving needs?

In the midmarket space, small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) often need support to buoy them through any choppy waters ahead. As a SaaS solutions provider, SAP has extensive expertise developing strategies to connect innovative companies with their customers.

“We’ve seen how so many SMBs want to become the next billion-dollar companies as they move from being innovators and disruptors to global leaders,” says Greg Petraetis, senior vice president and managing director, Midmarket and Partner Ecosystem, North America at SAP, in an interview with Protocol. “And we’re there to catch them along that trajectory and help them achieve that profitable growth.”

Keep Reading Show less
David Silverberg
David Silverberg is a Toronto-based freelance journalist, editor and writing coach. He writes for The Washington Post, BBC News, Business Insider, The Toronto Star, New Scientist, Fodor's, and several alumni magazines. He also writes for brands such as 23andme, Shopify and Bold Commerce. He has served as editor of B2B News Network, Canada's only B2B news magazine, and Digital Journal, a leading pioneer in citizen journalism. Find more about him at www.davidsilverberg.ca

Will there be China tech IPOs to watch in 2022?

After the DiDi chaos, Chinese companies are cautiously looking to return to the capital market.

If TikTok parent company ByteDance went public this year, it would undoubtedly become the biggest IPO of any Chinese company in 2022.

Photo Illustration: Omar Marques/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

As 2022 begins, the biggest question for China IPO watchers is: Will there still be any significant IPOs this year worth anticipating?

For them, 2021 was divided into two halves: The first six months were filled with ambitious Chinese companies listing overseas, culminating in ride-hailing giant DiDi’s IPO on June 30, but it was all downhill from there. In the wake of DiDi’s rushed IPO, Chinese regulators imposed harsh cybersecurity reviews on several companies that were about to go public. Others put their IPO plans on hold. Stock markets reacted accordingly: Alibaba, Pinduoduo and others saw their share prices slashed in half.

Keep Reading Show less
Zeyi Yang

Zeyi Yang is a reporter with Protocol | China. Previously, he worked as a reporting fellow for the digital magazine Rest of World, covering the intersection of technology and culture in China and neighboring countries. He has also contributed to the South China Morning Post, Nikkei Asia, Columbia Journalism Review, among other publications. In his spare time, Zeyi co-founded a Mandarin podcast that tells LGBTQ stories in China. He has been playing Pokemon for 14 years and has a weird favorite pick.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Will NFT backlash stop the blockchain gaming boom?

Few players seem to want NFTs. But that might not be enough to stop blockchain gaming from going mainstream.

NFTs in particular, and the broader blockchain gaming movement of which they are a part, have elicited a rare level of polarization among players, developers and large game-makers.
Illustration: fairywong/DigitalVision Vectors/Getty Images; Protocol

The non-fungible token debate has moved from the art world to the gaming industry, and it’s morphed into an all-consuming fight about the future of entertainment and what role, if any, the crypto movement should play in the way video games make money.

From microtransactions to crunch culture, the video game industry is full of unsavory business practices that persist in spite of widespread backlash among the general gaming audience and near-constant denunciation from outspoken industry leaders and critics. That’s in part because such practices are often lucrative or steeped in industry norms that are difficult or costly to change.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt
Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.

Tech workers want three-day weekends. It won’t be possible everywhere, but more companies are starting to consider it.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Welcome back to Ask a Tech Worker. For this recurring feature, I’ve been hitting the streets of San Francisco’s Financial District at lunchtime to chat with tech employees about how the workplace is changing. This time I asked about the four-day work week, that elusive schedule that companies like Bolt, Signifyd, Panasonic, Eidos-Montréal and Wildbit have adopted and a number of others have tested or considered. Got a suggestion for a future topic? Email me.

The four-day work week may be the next frontier for tech companies using work-life balance to compete for talent. Since the New Year, Bolt, commerce protection platform Signifyd and Panasonic have all announced that they’re offering four-day weeks to employees.

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.
Latest Stories