Internet service providers have so much data on you

From wearables to "Gospel and Grits": FTC finds that AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and other ISPs obscure what personal data they collect and how they use it — but it's not clear what the government can do.

An internet router

The FTC detailed extensive data collection by ISPs in a report.

Photo: Stephen Phillips/Unsplash

The FTC on Thursday unveiled a report highlighting that internet service providers — the companies that get you online at home or on your phone — need to be at least as much a part of the privacy conversation as Facebook… even if the government appears hamstrung in overseeing their practices.

"Many ISP's in our study can be at least as privacy-intrusive as large advertising platforms," FTC attorney Andrea Arias said, announcing the findings of the study on AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, Google Fiber and T-Mobile as well as some of their advertising affiliates.

The report, which was based on 2019 information demands and public reporting, details how some of the companies make use of extensive granular user data, including mobile app usage, web browsing, search contents and more. The companies use the data to provide certain services as well as for advertising, sometimes collecting more than appeared necessary to supply services. Notably, the companies disclose very little to consumers about how their information is used.

The FTC also found that ISPs often combine customer data from across business lines, products and services, pulling together information from broadband businesses with information from other divisions such as TV, home security or even wearables.

Some of the broadband providers covered in the report also shared users' real-time location data with third parties, which could go to those giving medical assistance but sometimes ends up in the hands of others, such as bounty hunters. Some of the broadband providers also grouped consumers together for advertising purposes using sensitive characteristics such as religion, ethnicity or political affiliation, or proxies for them. Segments included "pro-choice," "African-American," "Jewish," "Asian Achievers," "Gospel and Grits" and more, the report found.

The FTC did not name which companies engaged in which practices and made clear that not every company was engaged in every tactic in the report. Some details in the report had already emerged in public reporting.

Several of the ways ISPs collect data may concern users, the report suggests, including the combining of several data streams as well as ISPs' ability to ignore user settings in browsers and apps that may block some tracking.

Any concern that users might have about these practices, however, likely falls into a regulatory black hole. In most cases, the FCC, rather than the FTC, regulates broadband service. In late 2016, the FCC adopted a rule that would limit the ways in which ISPs could collect and use customers' personal data. Early on in the Trump administration, however, Congress annulled that rule using a procedure that also prohibits the agency from reissuing any substantially similar rule in the future.

Even if the two Democrats on the FCC wanted to take another stab at ISP privacy and tried to formulate new, highly original regulations, the commission is still facing political gridlock because of President Biden's nearly unprecedented delay in naming a chair to the agency. With four commissioners in place — split evenly among party lines — any such rule is unlikely at best to win a majority vote. In addition, a long further delay could actually put the Republicans into the majority on the commission because Jessica Rosenworcel, the acting chair, must leave by the end of the year unless she's renominated and confirmed.

That leaves the FTC, which has the power to enforce laws against companies that engage in deceptive or misleading business practices. That, to date, has made it the country's de facto federal privacy regulator. The agency has also reportedly been mulling over new rules on digital privacy overall.

But the FTC is busy. Under chair Lina Khan, the FTC has taken up a time- and resource-intensive agenda that also is aiming for broader enforcement of both monopolization and mergers, additional rules governing industries and more. That may leave little room to try to oversee industries like internet service that theoretically already have a dedicated regulator — although former FCC chair Ajit Pai, a Republican who oversaw and applauded the rollback of the privacy rule, said at the time that privacy should fall under the FTC's auspices.

The FTC is also currently politically split as well, although Biden has nominated a third Democrat to join the commission pending approval from the Senate.

"The Federal Communications Commission has the clearest legal authority and expertise to fully oversee internet service providers," Khan said after Arias detailed the report's findings. "I fully support efforts to reassert that authority."


Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.


The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories