Policy

Lina Khan's FTC, back on its heels, eyes a big swing at tech

The new chair led a series of wonky rule changes at the agency, but they signal it could take on everything from food delivery to facial recognition.

FTC chair Lina Khan

FTC chair Lina Khan

Photo: Pool/Getty Images

Watch out, Uber Eats. Lina Khan, the Federal Trade Commission's new chair, is taking charge of the agency's Democratic majority to broaden the FTC's ability to regulate new industries and challenge potentially anticompetitive conduct.

On Thursday, during the first of the FTC's new public meetings, commissioners cast a series of votes that signaled a desire to tighten the screws on emerging and digital sectors, as members of the public, consumer advocates and industry lobbyists begged the commission to tackle issues such as food delivery apps, right to repair, facial recognition and more.

Thursday's changes, while largely bureaucratic, could have outsized effect coming from an agency that in recent decades narrowed its own approach to the sweeping statutes that govern its powers.

The FTC has also seen Congress and the courts restrict its efforts when it tried to go big, including a recent unanimous Supreme Court decision limiting its ability to quickly secure money for harmed consumers and a federal court's (temporary) dismissal earlier this week of its marquee antitrust case against Facebook.

Khan, who seems willing to risk a backlash if it means finding viable ways to limit corporate power, made the procedural changes her first public move as chair, with big implications for tech.

The FTC has oversight of consumer protection issues such as privacy and antitrust enforcement as well as fair competition between companies, and as such has increasingly found itself becoming the nation's de facto tech regulator. Even before this week's procedural changes, commissioners had explored whether biased algorithms and designs that nudge consumers online could constitute the kinds of "unfair or deceptive acts" the agency polices under Section 5 of the FTC Act.

Section 5 was the focus of much of the action on Thursday. It is already at the core of the FTC's ability to combat data breaches as well, and Democratic Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter cited "data abuses" and practices in online ticket sales as potential new targets for rule-making during the meeting.

Khan and the two other Democrats moved to streamline the FTC's procedures for making those rules, which can govern unfairness and deception on the scale of whole sectors, particularly those that have just emerged or are changing faster than Congress tends to address them.

Slaughter, who acted as chair until Khan was named, said that Congress's grant of regulatory authority sent "a clear directive to the FTC to promulgate trade rules to protect consumers in the dynamic and changing economic landscape."

The FTC has rarely used its rule-making authority, which had long been viewed as more cumbersome than other agencies', since a series of regulations in the 1970s prompted lawmaker pushback. Most famously, the FTC's attempts to regulate children's advertising were cast as the height of nanny-state overreach after a campaign by advertisers, causing Congress to rein in the agency's regulatory powers. The rule-making was dead by the time President Reagan took office and initiated a deregulatory agenda.

During the meeting, the commission's two Republicans, Christine Wilson and Noah Phillips, slammed what they cast as the removal of guardrails against politicized and unpredictable enforcement and the possibility of costly regulation. The powerful U.S. Chamber of Commerce business lobby warned Khan's changes "will lead to litigation."

Against the government's antitrust clashes with tech giants like Facebook and Amazon, the hullabaloo going into Thursday's meeting focused on the commission's 2015 statement that it would limit its use of its authority, also under Section 5, to tackle "unfair methods of competition" and keep it in line with antitrust powers that the commission derives from other laws.

Broader theories of unfair competition could potentially help the FTC if it seeks to rewrite its complaint against Facebook to address a judge's dismissal of the agency's initial set of allegations, and more discretion could also widen the field for other future lawsuits, including against Big Tech.

Both Wilson and several tech groups argued the revocation of the self-imposed limits on the FTC's powers would have the opposite of its intended effect and instead harm consumers.

"Consumers will face higher prices, less innovation and reduction in quality," she said, noting that the 2015 approach focuses on those issues.

Critics allied with Khan, meanwhile, have said the FTC was pulling its own punches with the statement, and some celebrated its removal.

"The commission's efforts to constrain Section 5 in this way have only hindered the agency's enforcement efforts," Khan said.

Then she seemed to give a hint of her future agenda.

"Withdrawing the 2015 statement is only the start of our efforts to clarify the meaning of Section 5 and apply it to today's market," she said.

From menus to AI

Then came the speakers, after the votes. More than 30 people took advantage of the opportunity to bring up a wide array of competition, privacy and other concerns including the pharmaceutical and grocery industries, online privacy, bias in facial recognition, data collection by smart speakers, right to repair, ed tech and Chinese drones.

Many of the topics were ones in which the commission has already dabbled, but several speakers urged the FTC to come down on third-party delivery apps like Uber Eats, Grubhub and DoorDash in particular.

"These tech companies have existed for far too long with absolutely no oversight," said a woman who described herself as a Las Vegas restaurant owner, alleging the companies are "stealing" menus and have little transparency in billing.

The company did not return a request for comment. In 2018, Uber settled with the FTC over allegations it "deceived consumers about its privacy and data security practices."

Other speakers urged the FTC to support consumers' right to repair what they own. Hardware and device manufacturers have sought to curtail those rights, and the FTC recently found such efforts had "scant evidence to support" them. Another speaker brought up data collection by Amazon's Ring security cameras and its Alexa smart devices, as well concerns about Amazon's facial recognition technology.

The commission is already investigating Amazon's competitive practices, and the company sought on Wednesday to remove Khan, who came to prominence with her criticism of the ecommerce giant, from the proceedings.
Climate

How GM plans to make its ambitious EV goals reality

The automaker's chief sustainability officer is optimistic that GM is well-positioned to rapidly scale up the EV side of its business.

"I think everything that’s been put in place to support the transition will be a real positive for the industry and for the country."

Photo: Eva Marie Uzcategui/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Automakers are on the cusp of an entirely new era.

The transition to electric vehicles is quickly becoming more than just theoretical: More models are coming onto the scene every day. This week, the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law, enshrining a new structure for EV tax credits and offering a boost to domestic critical mineral mining. The transition isn’t coming a moment too soon, given that the transportation sector makes up the largest share of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

As management teams at financial institutions look for best practices to make part of their regular toolkit, they are reaching most for the ones that increase the speed and reduce the risk of large-scale change.

That forward-thinking approach can lead financial institutions to leverage AI technology, which can help give decision-makers trusted tools to solve integral challenges vital to the health of the business. One of the leading providers of AI and machine-learning software, DataRobot continues to attract clients in financial services who want to de-risk their AI investments and rapidly scale AI to almost every part of their operations, resulting in improved productivity and higher customer satisfaction.

Keep Reading Show less
David Silverberg
David Silverberg is a Toronto-based freelance journalist, editor and writing coach. He writes for The Washington Post, BBC News, Business Insider, The Toronto Star, New Scientist, Fodor's, and several alumni magazines. He also writes for brands such as 23andme, Shopify and Bold Commerce. He has served as editor of B2B News Network, Canada's only B2B news magazine, and Digital Journal, a leading pioneer in citizen journalism. Find more about him at www.davidsilverberg.ca
Entertainment

How Embracer Group bought ‘Lord of the Rings’ rights for a bargain

The Swedish holding company, known best for its gaming acquisitions, bought the rights to “The Lord of the Rings.” But the deal is much more complicated than it seems.

Who really owns LOTR's rights?

Photo: New Line/WireImage

A new stakeholder has entered the complex licensing web of “The Lord of the Rings,” and the landmark deal has further complicated the already messy media empire surrounding author J.R.R. Tolkien’s fantasy epic.

The buyer, the acquisition-hungry Swedish gaming conglomerate known as Embracer Group, has purchased Middle-earth Enterprises, and with it the associated film, video game, board game, merchandise, theater production and theme park rights to the core LOTR book trilogy and “The Hobbit'' from its previous owner, The Saul Zaentz Company. Formerly Tolkien Enterprises, Zaentz’s holding group has held onto the rights since purchasing them from United Artists in 1976. (Tolkien initially sold them to UA in 1969, four years before his death.)

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.

Fintech

Upstart has a new plan to sell Wall Street on its loans

The AI-powered lender will hold some loans on its balance sheet as it seeks partners for long-term capital.

Despite the current struggles, Upstart views the marketplace model as the best way to write to keep its loan business growing.

Photo: Upstart

After a revenue drop its CEO called “unacceptable,” the leadership at fintech lender Upstart is making a bet on the strength of its ability to underwrite loans with AI.

The San Mateo company is planning to leave some loans on its balance sheet that investors do not want to buy, as concerns about the economy shift Wall Street away from backing riskier consumer debt. Rather than pull back on its lending in response, the company said it will hold some loans as it seeks longer-term capital partners.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Enterprise

Does your boss sound a little funny? It might be an audio deepfake

Voice deepfake attacks against enterprises, often aimed at tricking corporate employees into transferring money to the attackers, are on the rise. And at least in some cases, they’re succeeding.

Audio deepfakes are a new spin on the impersonation tactics that have long been used in social engineering and phishing attacks, but most people aren’t trained to disbelieve their ears.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

As a cyberattack investigator, Nick Giacopuzzi’s work now includes responding to growing attacks against businesses that involve deepfaked voices — and has ultimately left him convinced that in today's world, "we need to question everything."

In particular, Giacopuzzi has investigated multiple incidents where an attacker deployed fabricated audio, created with the help of AI, that purported to be an executive or a manager at a company. You can guess how it went: The fake boss asked an employee to urgently transfer funds. And in some cases, it’s worked, he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.

Latest Stories
Bulletins