Senators don't want Amazon and Google to take over home devices, too

At a hearing, lawmakers from both sides of the aisle said they didn't want the companies to become even more dominant than they already are.

Nest Audio speakers of different colors lined up

In the midst of a fervor for antitrust, lawmakers want to make sure Amazon and Google face competition in the smart device market.

Photo: Google

Lawmakers warned Amazon and Google on Tuesday that they don't want to see the companies take over the smart home device market.

"In home technology we see some of the most powerful firms that dominate tech today poised to dominate platforms of the future," said Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar, the chair of a subcommittee holding a hearing on competition among voice assistants, smart speakers, connected TVs, thermostats and other devices.

She and other lawmakers on the panel said the session was an effort that could result in legislation to get ahead of potential problems in a rapidly expanding market rather than waiting for those issues to become dire. Concern came from Democrats and Republicans that the giant companies could use their power to keep rivals off of devices, boost their own offerings and squash upstarts.

The hearing came at the beginning of a new moment in tech antitrust in the United States: Earlier on Tuesday, the Senate confirmed Lina Khan, a critic of competitive practices in Big Tech who helped build a movement to reform antitrust law, to serve on the Federal Trade Commission in a bipartisan vote. Klobuchar announced during the hearing that President Joe Biden had designated her the agency's chair.

Last week, the leaders of the House's antitrust subcommittee that probed competition by Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Google also released a long-awaited set of bipartisan bills that represent some of the most serious proposals to alter antitrust law in decades. Perhaps the most controversial bill would allow government enforcers to seek to break up big digital platforms when "conflicts of interest" exist between its business lines.

European regulators also signaled earlier in June that they had concerns about competition among IoT devices that could soon lead to the opening of new competition cases.

"Big Tech already controls nearly everything we do online," said Sen. Mike Lee, the top Republican on the subcommittee, during the hearing. "Are we now willing, for the sake of some minor convenience, to give them control over our homes as well?"

"Surely we already know enough to know that this isn't going to end well," Lee added.

Firewalls and restrictions

Among the concerns that senators raised at the hearing was that Amazon or Google could erect technical barriers to competitors' services working on devices, or that the companies could stop devices from working together. Amazon could theoretically block competitors to its Alexa voice assistant from working on its Echo devices, for instance, or could have the speakers push owners to replenish their empty refrigerators with Whole Foods groceries rather than wares from a supermarket that Amazon doesn't own.

The lawmakers also worried that the dominant firms could use their financial might to subsidize subpar offerings, or extract information on rivals working on their platforms and use the data to compete against them.

"It's an environment, as a result of that conflict, that is rife with exploitation and appropriation every bit as serious as in the days of the oil well titans or the railroad behemoths," said Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal, who called for "lines-of-business restrictions and data firewalls to prevent Big Tech from weaponizing those troves of sensitive data to further their own business interest and squash competition."

In many ways, the lawmakers appeared to worry that Amazon, Google and other big tech companies would repeat the steps that have already led them to become dominant in other digital markets. Google in particular faces government antitrust lawsuits over its distribution of search and its giant ad tech operation. It says it faces tough competition and focuses on improving its offerings for users.

In the hearing, representatives for Amazon and Google touted their efforts to try to ensure that devices and services could work together and cited the variety of other companies seeking to make devices and services for smart home systems.

"There's a robust conversation happening across the industry to try to address some of these issues," said Wilson White, a senior policy official at Google, calling openness a corporate "north star." Yet White admitted that their company's approach to working with rivals and partners is evolving, and he alluded to worry that fully-open digital platforms could raise privacy concerns.

The senators also heard from a representative from smart speaker maker Sonos, a longtime Google critic and competitor.

Eddie Lazarus, the company's chief legal officer, said consumers should be able to use the biggest voice assistants on the same device. He added that Amazon's current partnerships with other companies are "just an on-ramp into the Amazon ecosystem now, because you can't mix-and-match between the big companies."

Following the hearing, Lazarus told Protocol that he was encouraged by nonpartisan nature of the hearing. "They came well prepared," he said. "They were sending a signal that they intend to craft some legislation." Lazarus said that he walked away believing that it could lead to real action. "I think this is a singular moment in time from a legislative standpoint," he said.

Klobuchar has previously introduced her own detailed proposals to rein in Big Tech's power and published a book on the subject earlier this year. Her bill to boost fees for mergers also recently passed the Senate.

While Klobuchar's proposals didn't go as far as those in the House, lawmakers from both chambers are working together to advance legislation, and Lee also unveiled his opening legislative bid on Monday. His bill would tighten rules around mergers while codifying that antitrust cases should focus on harm to consumers in the form of increased prices, restricted output and other economic measures.

The hearing represented a sequel to earlier testimony on mobile app stores in April. During that hearing, Klobuchar and Lee expressed bipartisan frustration with Google and Apple as developers spilled their longtime allegations of bullying in public testimony.

"It's time to get moving, and we're ready to go," Klobuchar said at the end of Tuesday's session.

Janko Roettgers contributed to the reporting.


Should startups be scared?

Stock market turmoil is making VCs skittish. Could now be the best time to start a company?

yellow sticky notes on gray wall
Photo by Startaê Team on Unsplash

This week, we break down why Elon Musk is tweeting about the S&P 500's ESG rankings — and why he might be right to be mad. Then we discuss how tech companies are failing to prevent mass shootings, and why the new Texas social media law might make it more difficult for platforms to be proactive.

Then Protocol's Biz Carson, author of the weekly VC newsletter Pipeline, joins us to explain the state of venture capital amidst plunging stocks and declining revenues. Should founders start panicking? The answer might surprise you.

Keep Reading Show less
Caitlin McGarry

Caitlin McGarry is the news editor at Protocol.

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.

Inside the Crypto Cannabis Club

As crypto crashes, an NFT weed club holds on to the high.

The Crypto Cannabis Club’s Discord has 23,000 subscribers, with 28 chapters globally.

Photo: Nat Rubio-Licht/Protocol

On a Saturday night in downtown Los Angeles, a group of high strangers gathered in a smoky, colorful venue less than a mile from Crypto.com Arena. The vibe was relaxed but excited, and the partygoers, many of whom were meeting each other for the very first time, greeted each other like old friends, calling each other by their Discord names. The mood was celebratory: The Crypto Cannabis Club, an NFT community for stoners, was gathering to celebrate the launch of its metaverse dispensary.

The warmth and belonging of the weed-filled party was a contrast to the metaverse store, which was underwhelming by comparison. But the dispensary launch and the NFTs required to buy into the group are just an excuse: As with most Web3 projects, it’s really about the community. Even though crypto is crashing, taking NFTs with it, the Crypto Cannabis Club is unphased, CEO Ryan Hunter told Protocol.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


Privacy and harassment could spoil Grindr’s Wall Street romance

As it pursues a long-held goal of going public, the gay dating app has to confront its demons.

Grindr may finally be a public company.

Illustration: woocat/iStock/Getty Images Plus; Protocol

Grindr's looking for more than just a hookup with Wall Street. Finding a stable relationship may be tough.

The location-based dating app favored by gay men was a pioneer, predating Tinder by three years. It’s bounced from owner to owner after founder Joel Simkhai sold it in 2018 for $245 million. A SPAC merger could be the answer, but businesses serving the LGBTQ+ community have had trouble courting investors. And Grindr has its own unique set of challenges.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol, covering breaking news. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.


The minerals we need to save the planet are getting way too expensive

Supply chain problems and rising demand have sent prices spiraling upward for the minerals and metals essential for the clean energy transition.

Critical mineral prices have exploded over the past year.

Photo: Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The newest source of the alarm bells echoing throughout the renewables industry? Spiking critical mineral and metal prices.

According to a new report from the International Energy Agency, a maelstrom of rising demand and tattered supply chains have caused prices for the materials needed for clean energy technologies to soar in the last year. And this increase has only accelerated since 2022 began.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Latest Stories