Senators don't want Amazon and Google to take over home devices, too

At a hearing, lawmakers from both sides of the aisle said they didn't want the companies to become even more dominant than they already are.

Nest Audio speakers of different colors lined up

In the midst of a fervor for antitrust, lawmakers want to make sure Amazon and Google face competition in the smart device market.

Photo: Google

Lawmakers warned Amazon and Google on Tuesday that they don't want to see the companies take over the smart home device market.

"In home technology we see some of the most powerful firms that dominate tech today poised to dominate platforms of the future," said Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar, the chair of a subcommittee holding a hearing on competition among voice assistants, smart speakers, connected TVs, thermostats and other devices.

She and other lawmakers on the panel said the session was an effort that could result in legislation to get ahead of potential problems in a rapidly expanding market rather than waiting for those issues to become dire. Concern came from Democrats and Republicans that the giant companies could use their power to keep rivals off of devices, boost their own offerings and squash upstarts.

The hearing came at the beginning of a new moment in tech antitrust in the United States: Earlier on Tuesday, the Senate confirmed Lina Khan, a critic of competitive practices in Big Tech who helped build a movement to reform antitrust law, to serve on the Federal Trade Commission in a bipartisan vote. Klobuchar announced during the hearing that President Joe Biden had designated her the agency's chair.

Last week, the leaders of the House's antitrust subcommittee that probed competition by Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Google also released a long-awaited set of bipartisan bills that represent some of the most serious proposals to alter antitrust law in decades. Perhaps the most controversial bill would allow government enforcers to seek to break up big digital platforms when "conflicts of interest" exist between its business lines.

European regulators also signaled earlier in June that they had concerns about competition among IoT devices that could soon lead to the opening of new competition cases.

"Big Tech already controls nearly everything we do online," said Sen. Mike Lee, the top Republican on the subcommittee, during the hearing. "Are we now willing, for the sake of some minor convenience, to give them control over our homes as well?"

"Surely we already know enough to know that this isn't going to end well," Lee added.

Firewalls and restrictions

Among the concerns that senators raised at the hearing was that Amazon or Google could erect technical barriers to competitors' services working on devices, or that the companies could stop devices from working together. Amazon could theoretically block competitors to its Alexa voice assistant from working on its Echo devices, for instance, or could have the speakers push owners to replenish their empty refrigerators with Whole Foods groceries rather than wares from a supermarket that Amazon doesn't own.

The lawmakers also worried that the dominant firms could use their financial might to subsidize subpar offerings, or extract information on rivals working on their platforms and use the data to compete against them.

"It's an environment, as a result of that conflict, that is rife with exploitation and appropriation every bit as serious as in the days of the oil well titans or the railroad behemoths," said Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal, who called for "lines-of-business restrictions and data firewalls to prevent Big Tech from weaponizing those troves of sensitive data to further their own business interest and squash competition."

In many ways, the lawmakers appeared to worry that Amazon, Google and other big tech companies would repeat the steps that have already led them to become dominant in other digital markets. Google in particular faces government antitrust lawsuits over its distribution of search and its giant ad tech operation. It says it faces tough competition and focuses on improving its offerings for users.

In the hearing, representatives for Amazon and Google touted their efforts to try to ensure that devices and services could work together and cited the variety of other companies seeking to make devices and services for smart home systems.

"There's a robust conversation happening across the industry to try to address some of these issues," said Wilson White, a senior policy official at Google, calling openness a corporate "north star." Yet White admitted that their company's approach to working with rivals and partners is evolving, and he alluded to worry that fully-open digital platforms could raise privacy concerns.

The senators also heard from a representative from smart speaker maker Sonos, a longtime Google critic and competitor.

Eddie Lazarus, the company's chief legal officer, said consumers should be able to use the biggest voice assistants on the same device. He added that Amazon's current partnerships with other companies are "just an on-ramp into the Amazon ecosystem now, because you can't mix-and-match between the big companies."

Following the hearing, Lazarus told Protocol that he was encouraged by nonpartisan nature of the hearing. "They came well prepared," he said. "They were sending a signal that they intend to craft some legislation." Lazarus said that he walked away believing that it could lead to real action. "I think this is a singular moment in time from a legislative standpoint," he said.

Klobuchar has previously introduced her own detailed proposals to rein in Big Tech's power and published a book on the subject earlier this year. Her bill to boost fees for mergers also recently passed the Senate.

While Klobuchar's proposals didn't go as far as those in the House, lawmakers from both chambers are working together to advance legislation, and Lee also unveiled his opening legislative bid on Monday. His bill would tighten rules around mergers while codifying that antitrust cases should focus on harm to consumers in the form of increased prices, restricted output and other economic measures.

The hearing represented a sequel to earlier testimony on mobile app stores in April. During that hearing, Klobuchar and Lee expressed bipartisan frustration with Google and Apple as developers spilled their longtime allegations of bullying in public testimony.

"It's time to get moving, and we're ready to go," Klobuchar said at the end of Tuesday's session.

Janko Roettgers contributed to the reporting.

LA is a growing tech hub. But not everyone may fit.

LA has a housing crisis similar to Silicon Valley’s. And single-family-zoning laws are mostly to blame.

As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers, whose high salaries put them at an advantage in both LA's renting and buying markets.

Photo: Nat Rubio-Licht/Protocol

LA’s tech scene is on the rise. The number of unicorn companies in Los Angeles is growing, and the city has become the third-largest startup ecosystem nationally behind the Bay Area and New York with more than 4,000 VC-backed startups in industries ranging from aerospace to creators. As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers. The city is quickly becoming more and more like Silicon Valley — a new startup and a dozen tech workers on every corner and companies like Google, Netflix, and Twitter setting up offices there.

But with growth comes growing pains. Los Angeles, especially the burgeoning Silicon Beach area — which includes Santa Monica, Venice, and Marina del Rey — shares something in common with its namesake Silicon Valley: a severe lack of housing.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

While there remains debate among economists about whether we are officially in a full-blown recession, the signs are certainly there. Like most executives right now, the outlook concerns me.

In any case, businesses aren’t waiting for the official pronouncement. They’re already bracing for impact as U.S. inflation and interest rates soar. Inflation peaked at 9.1% in June 2022 — the highest increase since November 1981 — and the Federal Reserve is targeting an interest rate of 3% by the end of this year.

Keep Reading Show less
Nancy Sansom

Nancy Sansom is the Chief Marketing Officer for Versapay, the leader in Collaborative AR. In this role, she leads marketing, demand generation, product marketing, partner marketing, events, brand, content marketing and communications. She has more than 20 years of experience running successful product and marketing organizations in high-growth software companies focused on HCM and financial technology. Prior to joining Versapay, Nancy served on the senior leadership teams at PlanSource, Benefitfocus and PeopleMatter.


SFPD can now surveil a private camera network funded by Ripple chair

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved a policy that the ACLU and EFF argue will further criminalize marginalized groups.

SFPD will be able to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks in certain circumstances.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Ripple chairman and co-founder Chris Larsen has been funding a network of security cameras throughout San Francisco for a decade. Now, the city has given its police department the green light to monitor the feeds from those cameras — and any other private surveillance devices in the city — in real time, whether or not a crime has been committed.

This week, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors approved a controversial plan to allow SFPD to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks during life-threatening emergencies, large events, and in the course of criminal investigations, including investigations of misdemeanors. The decision came despite fervent opposition from groups, including the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which say the police department’s new authority will be misused against protesters and marginalized groups in a city that has been a bastion for both.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.


These two AWS vets think they can finally solve enterprise blockchain

Vendia, founded by Tim Wagner and Shruthi Rao, wants to help companies build real-time, decentralized data applications. Its product allows enterprises to more easily share code and data across clouds, regions, companies, accounts, and technology stacks.

“We have this thesis here: Cloud was always the missing ingredient in blockchain, and Vendia added it in,” Wagner (right) told Protocol of his and Shruthi Rao's company.

Photo: Vendia

The promise of an enterprise blockchain was not lost on CIOs — the idea that a database or an API could keep corporate data consistent with their business partners, be it their upstream supply chains, downstream logistics, or financial partners.

But while it was one of the most anticipated and hyped technologies in recent memory, blockchain also has been one of the most failed technologies in terms of enterprise pilots and implementations, according to Vendia CEO Tim Wagner.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.


Kraken's CEO got tired of being in finance

Jesse Powell tells Protocol the bureaucratic obligations of running a financial services business contributed to his decision to step back from his role as CEO of one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges.

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Kraken is going through a major leadership change after what has been a tough year for the crypto powerhouse, and for departing CEO Jesse Powell.

The crypto market is still struggling to recover from a major crash, although Kraken appears to have navigated the crisis better than other rivals. Despite his exchange’s apparent success, Powell found himself in the hot seat over allegations published in The New York Times that he made insensitive comments on gender and race that sparked heated conversations within the company.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Latest Stories