Policy

Lonely people spend much more time on Facebook than the average user, internal documents show

Does Facebook help or hurt lonely people?

Facebook Papers: Mark Zuckerberg

Lonely people spend much more time on Facebook.

George Frey/Bloomberg; Getty Images; Protocol illustration

For people who already feel lonely, spending time on Facebook doesn't help — but it doesn't necessarily hurt, either, according to internal documents.

In November 2018, Facebook researchers produced an internal report called, "Facebook both increases and decreases loneliness." The researchers found basically a U-shaped curve for loneliness and Facebook use: People who identified as less lonely spent about an hour per day scrolling through the platform, whereas users who identified as more lonely logged on either for much shorter or much longer periods of time.

The research is part of disclosures made to the SEC and provided to Congress in redacted form by whistleblower Frances Haugen's legal counsel. The documents show how some of the platform's features, like Facebook Memories, work as a double-edged sword. Depending on the circumstance, they can sometimes make people feel better, but also sometimes make people feel worse and prompt negative social comparison.

Meta (formerly Facebook) spokesperson Joe Osborne told Protocol the company has continued to conduct research around understanding loneliness and social connection. "The research has informed how we build higher quality social experiences across our products — and we're committed to continuing it."

Using Facebook helps to decrease loneliness more than using other social media platforms such as Instagram, Twitter and dating apps, the study found. On the other hand, respondents said using the platform made them feel more lonely than participating in any other activities outlined in the survey such as listening to music, spending time with family and friends or even watching TV or YouTube.

"It could be that people have different expectations about Facebook," one of the study's authors wrote. "People may not expect TV and video games to affect their loneliness much, other than to distract or entertain them. But Facebook is social, so people may expect it to have a larger impact on their loneliness, both increasing and decreasing it."

Some users who reported being the most isolated were at the extremes for daily Facebook use, averaging either three hours or more on the platform, or 10 minutes or less. Not only do lonelier people spend much more or much less time on Facebook compared to other users, but also they use the time they do spend differently. Facebook's research found lonely users tend to be more passive (reading more and posting less) and are more likely to compare themselves to others.

Some specific Facebook products also had mixed outcomes for users with feelings of isolation. One of the most obvious examples was Facebook Memories: Researchers found that the feature made some people feel more lonely, and others feel less so. "This is a good reminder that features like On This Day impact people differently, depending on the person, the memory and the context," the author wrote.

Researchers seemed to have reservations about what respondents said made them feel better. They found that funny and inspirational content or posts that help users learn something new made them feel better, but the author of the study warned that those kinds of posts may only bring short-term happiness, and instead suggested that deeper connections with other people are most valuable. "Talking one-on-one with other people may be uncomfortable or less entertaining in the short term, but may be most beneficial in the long term."

The research was conducted across about a dozen countries, but was not broken out across demographic features such as age or gender. Users from the United States were among those who reported feeling the least amount of loneliness on the platform, while users from countries including Egypt, Thailand and Turkey reported the highest feelings of isolation.

While age wasn't accounted for in the study, previous reports showed Facebook and Instagram playing a role in poor mental health among teens specifically. The Wall Street Journal reported in September that Instagram made teen girls feel worse about their bodies and sometimes prompted mental health issues such as depression and eating disorders. Those issues have caught the attention of lawmakers, who have since pledged to look into the issue and push for measures to better protect teens online.

According to the 2018 report, researchers said the solutions to these issues boiled down to balancing Facebook's algorithms; uprank funny content, but don't overdo it because it may only help in the short term. Allow users to set time limits on the platform so they spend less passive time scrolling. Keep Facebook Memories, but give users the option to tap out of the feature if they want.

The exact steps Facebook took since that study are unclear. Currently, it's possible to block Facebook Memories, and users can set reminders when they've reached a certain amount of time scrolling through Facebook. But those have been the only obvious changes to fighting isolation on Facebook. It's unclear whether Facebook upranks more uplifting content, and if it does, what kind of effect that has on lonely users.

Less than a year after conducting the study, Facebook researchers came out with another report detailing the platform's goals for dealing with loneliness. More than one in three — 37% — of Facebook users indicated that they had "felt lonely and had no one to turn to," the second report found.

Based on that report, Facebook decided to prioritize supporting users through life transitions and those more likely to experience loneliness or isolation, such as veterans and new parents. "Because people conduct so much of their social life on Facebook, we are in a unique position to detect triggers for loneliness and proactively provide support," the document reads. The team also made it a point to reduce the stigma around loneliness, particularly in at-risk countries and for at-risk populations.

But again, the platform's actions since setting those goals are up in the air. Sure, users could seek out a Facebook Group for support in any given circumstance. But if, how and when Facebook took measures to address the stigma around loneliness, support life transitions and help those more likely to feel alone are largely unknown.

Climate

This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Workplace

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

Climate

The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Policy

White House AI Bill of Rights lacks specific guidance for AI rules

The document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is long on tech guidance, but short on restrictions for AI.

While the document provides extensive suggestions for how to incorporate AI rights in technical design, it does not include any recommendations for restrictions on the use of controversial forms of AI.

Photo: Ana Lanza/Unsplash

It was a year in the making, but people eagerly anticipating the White House Bill of Rights for AI will have to continue waiting for concrete recommendations for future AI policy or restrictions.

Instead, the document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is legally non-binding and intended to be used as a handbook and a “guide for society” that could someday inform government AI legislation or regulations.

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights features a list of five guidelines for protecting people in relation to AI use:

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins