Policy

Want to pitch a16z? Make sure it’s Lindy.

Silicon Valley kingmaker Marc Andreessen invests according to the Lindy principle. It’s one of many heuristics in his interconnected and sometimes contradictory web of ideology.

Illustrated head with a scribbled arrow through it

The Lindy Effect plays a large role in Marc Andreessen's thinking.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

What do countryside strolls, manual car keys, grapes, skipping breakfast and Harvard all have in common? They’re all Lindy — at least, according to various disciples of the theory.

The Harvard contribution comes from one of the most prominent Lindy believers: Marc Andreessen, co-founder of Andreessen Horowitz.

It’s not a stretch to say your startup doesn’t matter until it’s on a16z’s radar. Facebook, Lyft, Instagram, Affirm, Roblox and Coinbase all benefited from early a16z investments. And with the firm fresh off a $9 billion fundraising campaign, startup founders are more eager than ever to understand the thought processes that determine who gets a coveted a16z stamp of approval.

The Lindy Effect, in principle, says that you can usually predict how long something will survive based on how long it’s been around. The thinking goes something like this: For something to survive a long time, it must be versatile and durable. Versatile and durable things are more likely to survive relative to new and unproven concepts. Books, therefore, are Lindy; Kindles are not. Sandwiches are Lindy; cronuts, not so much. Coffee yes, Bang Energy drinks no.

So when Andreessen speculates that Harvard is Lindy because it’s “been around for 400 years, it’ll probably be around for another 400,” it isn’t just a random aside. Rather, it’s a rare peek into the mind of one of Silicon Valley’s most influential gatekeepers. (A16z did not respond to our request to interview Andreessen.)

Paul Skallas, a Lindy linchpin better known by the internet alias LindyMan, claims he and Andreessen exchanged messages for “a year or two” and said Andreessen considers the Lindy Effect when investing in a product. Pulling further at the Lindy thread reveals not only Andreessen’s fascination with heuristics, but also the niche sphere of internet intellectuals who shape his politics and investment decisions.

Overpriced cheesecake and long walks

Andreessen encountered Lindy, as many do, through cantankerous philosopher and retired financier Nassim Nicholas Taleb. A self-described “flâneur,” Taleb has amassed a loyal following of more than 800,000 Twitter users by unsparingly covering topics ranging from bitcoin (“a magnet for imbeciles”) to squid-ink pasta (“no self respecting Squid Ink eater will EVER put cheese on a fish pasta”).

Taleb presents himself as a sort of philosopher king living in Mediterranean exile. He regularly derides bureaucrats, journalists and academics, though he himself was a professor at New York University. He has a penchant for blocking people whom he regards as “idiots,” “bullshitters” or “trolls.” (Andreessen went on a similarly vocal blocking spree to kick off 2022.) And lest you decide these behaviors connote a character flaw, Taleb has already decided, “If assholes don’t find you arrogant, you are doing something wrong.”

In his 2012 book “Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder,” Taleb wrote of the Lindy Effect: “[T]he older the technology, not only the longer it is expected to last, but the more certainty I can attach to such a statement.” He adds that this rule only applies to nonperishable goods (no one expects an 80-year-old person to live another 80 years) and warns, “This is a noisy estimator that should work on average, not in every case.”

The term “Lindy” originated in a 1964 New Republic article that referenced a deli in New York, Lindy’s, where off-duty comedians theorized they could elongate their careers by making television appearances more sparingly over a longer period of time. Taleb elaborated on his Lindy theory in a Medium post published five years after “Antifragile,” in which he gives himself credit for developing the theory that best proves the Lindy Effect through models of fragility and anti-fragility. Taleb also warns readers that the eponymous deli has become a tourist trap that “proudly claims to be famous for its cheesecake.”

On a recently deleted episode of the Lindy Talk podcast, Andreessen said he’s “been a fan of Nassim Taleb’s for a long time.” According to Andreessen, they know each other “a little bit, not well,” since “we had him at a thing we did years ago.” Andreessen also said he’s read all of Taleb’s books “like eight times.”

An unlikely acquaintance

With Taleb largely out of reach, Andreessen instead forged a relationship with Taleb’s unsanctioned protégé, Skallas (LindyMan, if you prefer). Skallas recounted that he and Andreessen exchanged direct messages for a few years. Andreessen said he first discovered Skallas in the comments section of a Taleb post, where Skallas successfully corrected Taleb’s claim in “Antifragile” that the ancients did not have a term denoting the color blue as we know it today.

Last year, Andreessen went on Skallas' podcast to discuss some of their shared preoccupations. The conversation centered on the stagnation of mainstream culture and the disrupting force of global internet culture. Skallas writes about this topic often in his newsletter, which recently migrated from a16z-backed Substack to Twitter-owned Revue. He believes our mainstream culture is stuck, pointing to evidence such as the “epidemic of sequels coming out of Hollywood” and the lack of dramatic shifts in American fashion since the mid-2000s. Skallas blamed stuck culture on a top-down media monoculture that gets fed to people through algorithms. Andreessen generally agreed, though he added that “the internet’s kinda eating all culture” because it moves in cycles that are so much faster than upstream media.

The duo then grafted this model of media homogeneity onto American politics: Andreessen suggested that a pent-up demand for novelty helps explain Trump’s political success. “The other side of Trump was the other 14 guys on stage with him at the Republican debates early on,” Andreessen said. “The other side is just the cookie-cutter thing — which is like, you know, who is the average successful politician? You know, it’s a guy in a suit with a certain kind of hair who gives a certain kind of speech behind a certain kind of podium reading off a certain kind of teleprompter, reading the exact same words as the next guy. You know, completely indistinguishable.” (Andreessen, however, is not above giving money to conventional politicians on both sides of the aisle, including Sens. Mitt Romney and Cory Booker and Reps. Eric Cantor and Ro Khanna.)

Later on, Andreessen pontificated on world-saving efforts by elite institutions such as Davos, the Gates Foundation, the Ford Foundation, The New York Times and tech companies.

“How do we know that our answers are the right ones?” Andreessen mused. “This goes back to these epidemiology issues, these climate change issues, and so forth. It’s just like, OK, like, we’ve got our views on how the world should be saved and we’ve got our science that claims to justify it and we’ve got our morality which all seems crystal clear. But we are at the end of the day the elites, and so we are the most insulated from all of the downstream consequences from all of the changes that we’re demanding everyone around us make.”

In many respects, Andreessen and Skallas make for strange bedfellows. Skallas isn’t an elite, after all — at least, not the kind Andreessen meant. He works a day job as a corporate lawyer to support his moonlighting as a cultural critic. And while Andreessen is still held in high regard within this sphere of the internet, Skallas was accused of plagiarism in November. He made his Twitter account private shortly thereafter. He probably hasn’t helped his cause by boasting in interviews: “I really consider myself the greatest living writer, and I say that without irony.” For what it’s worth, he and Andreessen still follow one another on the platform.

Even when it comes to practicing the Lindy lifestyle — however you interpret that — the two men seemingly exhibit major differences. Skallas relocated from New York City to a quaint countryside town in France during the pandemic; in October, Andreessen paid $177 million for a Malibu home, setting a new price record for California home real estate. Skallas gives health advice based on applications of the Lindy principle, which yields tips such as lifting weights for exercise and avoiding canola oil. During their conversation, Andreessen told Skallas that he had started taking what could be “the actual miracle drug of all time” that’s used for diabetes, obesity and weight loss. Skallas replied, sounding skeptical, “Are you one of the first people on this? Are you like a guinea pig here?”

Carrying a heavy heuristic toolbox

And then, of course, there’s the fact that Andreessen is arguably one of the world’s foremost venture capitalists, a job that requires him to be at least mildly enthusiastic about a vector of technological progress that’s pointing in a decidedly un-Lindy direction.

In the future a16z is building, you will be able to trade $89,000 NFT derivatives on Coinbase while an anonymous, overworked Instacart employee squeezes avocados on your behalf in a grocery store two miles away. Your children never attend in-person school and instead take courses through Maven, though really they just spend all day playing “Work at a Pizza Place” on Roblox, using Affirm to buy custom avatars in seven easy installments of $29.99. Oh, and you haven’t seen your dog in a long time — maybe he’s still at the DogVacay apartment where you dropped him off last week?

This tech-heavy, app-driven, metaverse-ready future is a far cry from the Lindy ideal of living in a Mediterranean villa where you invite your neighbors over to eat squid-ink pasta (sans cheese, obviously), made with ingredients sourced from the same seas and fields that sustained your ancestors.

Even if you don’t buy into the lifestyle applications of Lindy, it’s still possible to imagine scenarios in which the concept would be useful to an investor. For instance, the Lindy Effect would predict a short lifespan for fake meat companies such as Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods. It would also tell you that people won’t easily accept the idea of appending electronics to their heads in the form of Google Glass or other augmented-reality glasses.

But successful venture capitalists need to invest in something, and that’s where Lindy seemingly falls short. Lindy would predict a short lifespan for social media, which is in part designed to upend millennia-old social structures. If Andreessen had applied the Lindy Effect in such cases, he’d be a few billion dollars poorer. Similar arguments can be made for the bulk of companies in a16z’s portfolio.

That’s not to say the Lindy principle is wrong. In the first place, it never claimed to have empirical predicting power. Of greater importance to a venture capitalist: A technology can be short-lived while still making investors extraordinarily wealthy along the way. Social media is clearly having a profound impact on our society, even if most Americans would say that’s for the worse. The field could disappear along with the rest of Western civilization, but you’d be a shabby venture capitalist if you’d passed up on the opportunity to invest in Facebook, Instagram or Twitter.

The key to solving this apparent contradiction is understanding that Lindy is only one of many heuristics in Andreessen’s toolbox. In a single interview on the niche podcast “After the Orgy,” Andreessen referenced tall poppy syndrome, OODA loops and the scapegoat mechanism.

Tall poppy syndrome, for instance, refers to cultures in which those who visibly strive for excellence get attacked by the collective. Andreessen finds the phenomenon “horrifying” and sees a raging pandemic of tall poppy syndrome in the U.S. and throughout Europe.

The OODA (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act) loop, meanwhile, is a U.S. military decision-making framework. To Andreessen, it explains “why internet politics [and] internet culture takes over everything.” The framework suggests that if one combatant is able to go through their decision-making cycle faster than the opponent, they will break the opponent’s cycle and force them to restart. Doing this over and over ends up paralyzing the opponent, since they can never complete a cycle.

Finally, the scapegoat mechanism comes from Stanford philosopher René Girard, a beloved thinker among a circle of highly influential tech figures — most notably Peter Thiel. The theory claims that societies project unconscious desires on scapegoats, whom they proceed to destroy in public rituals. This provides catharsis and allows the community to reestablish social cohesion after it has symbolically cleansed itself by destroying the scapegoat. Andreessen remarked: “I think it is fair to say the internet in many ways, or social media generally, is a very effective scapegoating machine.”

The ideas don’t necessarily go together or fit into the Lindy framework, but that might be exactly the point.

The OODA loop is particularly difficult to reconcile with Lindy. If, as Andreessen said, “Internet culture just evolves faster, and the fact that it evolves faster guarantees it takes everything over,” then the obliteration of ancient cultural norms and technologies seems inevitable.

You don’t know what a dinner will look like by seeing all the ingredients and kitchen utensils laid out, but it can certainly help narrow the guesses. Similarly, while understanding just one, or even many, of Andreessen’s heuristics won’t allow you to know what he’s thinking, it could certainly help. But the heuristics often contradict one another, and they aren't mathematical formulas that yield the same output when given the same inputs. So for now, if you’re hoping to get a chunk of that a16z money, maybe just stick with taking a long Lindy walk to think things over — inspiration might arrive when you least expect it.

Workplace

How 'Dan from HR' became TikTok’s favorite career coach

You can get a lot of advice about corporate America on TikTok. ‘Dan from HR’ wants to make sure you’re getting the right instruction.

'Dan from HR' has posted hundreds of videos on his TikTok account about everything from cover letters to compensation.

Image: Dan Space

Daniel Space downloaded TikTok for the same reason most of us did. He was bored.

At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, Space wanted to connect with his younger cousin, who uses TikTok, so he thought he’d get on the platform and try it out (although he refused to do any of the dances). Eventually, the algorithm figured out that Space is a longtime HR professional and fed him a post with resume tips — the only issue was that the advice was “really horrible,” he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Sarah Roach

Sarah Roach is a reporter and producer at Protocol (@sarahroach_) where she contributes to Source Code, Protocol's daily newsletter. She is a recent graduate of George Washington University, where she studied journalism and mass communication and criminal justice. She previously worked for two years as editor in chief of her school's independent newspaper, The GW Hatchet.

Sponsored Content

A CCO’s viewpoint on top enterprise priorities in 2022

The 2022 non-predictions guide to what your enterprise is working on starting this week

As Honeywell’s global chief commercial officer, I am privileged to have the vantage point of seeing the demands, challenges and dynamics that customers across the many sectors we cater to are experiencing and sharing.

This past year has brought upon all businesses and enterprises an unparalleled change and challenge. This was the case at Honeywell, for example, a company with a legacy in innovation and technology for over a century. When I joined the company just months before the pandemic hit we were already in the midst of an intense transformation under the leadership of CEO Darius Adamczyk. This transformation spanned our portfolio and business units. We were already actively working on products and solutions in advanced phases of rollouts that the world has shown a need and demand for pre-pandemic. Those included solutions in edge intelligence, remote operations, quantum computing, warehouse automation, building technologies, safety and health monitoring and of course ESG and climate tech which was based on our exceptional success over the previous decade.

Keep Reading Show less
Jeff Kimbell
Jeff Kimbell is Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Honeywell. In this role, he has broad responsibilities to drive organic growth by enhancing global sales and marketing capabilities. Jeff has nearly three decades of leadership experience. Prior to joining Honeywell in 2019, Jeff served as a Partner in the Transformation Practice at McKinsey & Company, where he worked with companies facing operational and financial challenges and undergoing “good to great” transformations. Before that, he was an Operating Partner at Silver Lake Partners, a global leader in technology and held a similar position at Cerberus Capital LP. Jeff started his career as a Manufacturing Team Manager and Engineering Project Manager at Procter & Gamble before becoming a strategy consultant at Bain & Company and holding executive roles at Dell EMC and Transamerica Corporation. Jeff earned a B.S. in electrical engineering at Kansas State University and an M.B.A. at Dartmouth College.
Podcasts

1Password's CEO is ready for a password-free future

Fresh off a $620 million raise, 1Password CEO Jeff Shiner talks about the future of passwords.

1Password is a password manager, but it has plans to be even more.

Business is booming for 1Password. The company just announced it has raised $620 million, at a valuation of $6.8 billion, from a roster of A-list celebrities and well-known venture capitalists.

But what does a password manager need with $620 million? Jeff Shiner, 1Password’s CEO, has some plans. He’s building the team fast — 1Password has tripled in size in the last two years, up to 500 employees, and plans to double again this year — while also expanding the vision of what a password manager can do. 1Password has long been a consumer-first product, but the biggest opportunity lies in bringing the company’s knowhow, its user experience, and its security chops into the business world. 1Password already has more than 100,000 business customers, and it plans to expand fast.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Policy

Biden wants to digitize the government. Can these techies deliver?

A December executive order requires federal agencies to overhaul clunky systems. Meet the team trying to make that happen.

The dramatic uptick in people relying on government services, combined with the move to remote work, rendered inconvenient government processes downright painful.

Photo: Joe Daniel Price/Getty Images

Early last year, top White House officials embarked on a fact-finding mission with technical leaders inside government agencies. They wanted to know the answer to a specific question: If there was anything federal agencies could do to improve the average American’s experience interacting with the government, what would it be?

The list, of course, was a long one.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Entertainment

5 takeaways from Microsoft's Activision Blizzard acquisition

Microsoft just bought one of the world’s largest third-party game publishers. What now?

The nearly $70 billion acquisition gives Microsoft access to some of the most valuable brands in gaming.

Image: Microsoft Gaming

Just one week after Take-Two took the crown for biggest-ever industry acquisition, Microsoft strolled in Tuesday morning and dropped arguably the most monumental gaming news bombshell in years with its purchase of Activision Blizzard. The deal, at nearly $70 billion in all cash, dwarfs Take-Two’s purchase of Zynga, and it stands to reshape gaming as we know it.

The deal raises a number of pressing questions about the future of Activision Blizzard’s workplace culture issues, exclusivity in the game industry and whether such massive consolidation may trigger a regulatory response. None of these may be easily answered anytime soon, as the deal could take up to 18 months to close. But the question marks hanging over Activision Blizzard will loom large in the industry for the foreseeable future as Microsoft navigates its new role as one of the three largest game makers on the planet.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt
Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.
Latest Stories
Bulletins