These nuns could force Microsoft to put its money where its mouth is

A shareholder proposal filed by the Sisters of St. Joseph of Peace would require Microsoft to report whether its private lobbying aligns with its public statements.


Do the messages Microsoft's lobbyists are sending to lawmakers in private match the promises it's been making in public?

Image: Microsoft

Microsoft's lobbyists have been trolling the halls of Congress since before Mark Zuckerberg was old enough to drive. Since the late '90s, the tech giant has spent many millions of dollars every year to sway members of Congress on issues including antitrust and privacy. Last year, for the first time in a decade, Microsoft quietly outspent even Alphabet — and that's not including what Microsoft spent lobbying in states.

Now, a group of Microsoft shareholders, led by the Sisters of St. Joseph of Peace, is trying to force the company to ensure the messages its lobbyists are sending to lawmakers in private match the promises Microsoft has been making in public.

At their annual meeting later this month, Microsoft shareholders will vote on a proposal that would require Microsoft to conduct and publish a report detailing how its "direct and indirect" lobbying efforts align with the company's professed values regarding artificial intelligence, public policy, human rights and racial justice. "In general, transparency is all that the shareholders are asking for," said Sister Susan Francois, an assistant congregation leader and also a former Portland, Oregon election official.

As a congregation, she said, the Sisters of St. Joseph of Peace have been shareholder advocates for decades. They are filing the proposal as part of a group called Investor Advocates for Social Justice. "In the dark, it's easy to think bad things are happening," Francois said. "If we can shine a light on good governance, then it gives us all confidence we can move ahead in good faith."

Microsoft has been particularly vocal about issues related to tech's impact on society in recent years. Company President Brad Smith has called for regulation of facial recognition and swore off selling facial-recognition technology to police last year following the murder of George Floyd. But the group behind the proposal argues that, behind closed doors, Microsoft has pushed policies that are at odds with those statements. In its home state of Washington, for instance, the company lobbied against a bill that would have put a moratorium on government use of facial recognition. The company did, however, support a less-strict facial recognition bill that was sponsored by a state senator who is also a Microsoft employee.

"What we see is the company generally portrays itself as privacy-friendly, and yet we see that it is, in many cases, lobbying against those same principles," said Michael Connor, executive director of Open Mic, a nonprofit group that uses shareholder proposals to force corporate accountability.

Open Mic worked with shareholders on this and other proposals, one of which has already been successfully withdrawn by the filers. That proposal also called for Microsoft to conduct a human rights impact assessment related to its government contracts. Microsoft took shareholders up on that offer before the proposal even went to a vote.

Francois hoped this proposal would meet the same outcome, but the company has been less receptive to the proposal regarding its lobbying efforts. "Sadly this one did not move in [our] dialogue, so we had to go the route of a proxy vote," she said. "We prefer dialogue, and we hope to get there, but if we need to start this way, we'll start this way."

Microsoft declined to comment on the proposal beyond its official proxy statement. In a statement of opposition to the proposal, Microsoft insisted it already has a "long track record of meeting best practices for disclosure on public policy engagement." The company pointed to an annual report it publishes with its public policy agenda, as well as previous promises it's made to be more transparent about spending from its political action committee.

But political donations and lobbying are two different things, Connor said, and none of these disclosures address whether all of this spending aligns with Microsoft's public statements. "They're conflating political and lobbying spending disclosures with substantive discussions of misalignment," he said.

The proposal also calls on Microsoft to assess its indirect lobbying through trade groups, including the Chamber of Commerce. Recently, Microsoft has made changes to its trade group ties, withdrawing from the Internet Association, which also represents Microsoft's archrival Google. "As our business needs evolve, we periodically review trade association memberships to ensure alignment with our policy agenda," a Microsoft spokesperson said in a statement.

Tech shareholders, as well as tech workers who own stock, have become active in pushing proposals that target corporate responsibility. But those proposals face a nearly insurmountable challenge at companies like Meta and Alphabet, where a small number of executives, including founders, have dual-class shares that hold twice as much voting power as other shares.

Microsoft shareholders don't face that problem. But that doesn't make their task an easy one either, Connor said, noting that it's not unusual for shareholder proposals to be introduced several years in a row before they have an effect. "We're hoping smart people at Microsoft look at this and take it to heart," Connor said, "and maybe take action on it regardless of the vote."

Francois acknowledged that there may well be valid reasons for Microsoft to lobby on the issues it does. But existing lobbying disclosures offer little insight into what, exactly, corporations are asking for related to those issues. "We're just asking Microsoft to live out the policies that they've ensured shareholders they're living out," she said.


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories