NSO may sell off its Pegasus spyware — and open the door to US police contracts

“We’re in uncharted territory.”

NSO Group sign

NSO is reportedly in talks to sell off its software to U.S. defense contractor L3Harris.

Photo: Amir Levy/Getty Images

The Israeli spyware firm NSO Group has already demoed its Pegasus technology with the NYPD, pitched its phone-hacking technology to the San Diego PD and licensed Pegasus for evaluation by the FBI.

Those attempts by NSO to enter the U.S. law enforcement market appear to have mostly led to dead ends for the company. But now, as NSO is reportedly in talks to sell off its software to U.S. defense contractor L3Harris — the company behind StingRay cell phone trackers — experts fear it could swing open the door to U.S. law enforcement’s use of NSO’s hacking technology.

“Who is L3Harris going to sell to? The answer is: They’re going to sell to the same people who bought their StingRays, which is police,” said John Scott-Railton, a senior researcher at the University of Toronto’s Citizen Lab, who has extensively studied the use of Pegasus around the world.

“This seems to be a back-door way of getting U.S. and other big democracies’ business by hiding the technology within a company that already has law enforcement clients,” said Jennifer Granick, surveillance and cybersecurity counsel with the ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project. “It’s a melding of two really problematic companies, should the deal go forward.”

Neither NSO Group nor L3Harris responded to Protocol’s request for comment, but a spokesperson for L3Harris told The Guardian: “We are aware of the capability and we are constantly evaluating our customers’ national security needs. At this point, anything beyond that is speculation.” News of the possible acquisition was first reported by Intelligence Online.

Less than a year ago, the U.S. put NSO Group on the Commerce Department’s Entity List, which prohibits U.S. companies from exporting to blacklisted foreign companies without a license. At the time, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said the department was moving to “hold companies accountable” for “malicious activities that threaten the cybersecurity of members of civil society, dissidents, government officials, and organizations here and abroad.” Pegasus technology has been used to hack human rights defenders, journalists, State Department officials and many more.

The blacklisting by the U.S. has contributed to financial struggles for the company, which is now reportedly in talks to sell off the underlying code to its hacking technology. But the NSO’s status on the entity list does little to prevent such a deal from going through, said Doug Jacobson, an export controls attorney at the Washington, D.C. firm Jacobson Burton Kelley. Unlike OFAC sanctions, which prohibit all transactions with any sanctioned person or company, “the Entity List is very limited in scope” and applies only to exports, not imports or acquisitions, Jacobson said.

Still, such an acquisition by L3Harris would be unprecedented in nature. “We’re in uncharted territory,” Jacobson said. “I can’t even think of a case where a U.S. company bought a company on the entity list. Those types of companies typically are either highly problematic or not in the mainstream.”

It’s not hard to see why a potential deal between L3Harris and NSO could be mutually beneficial for both companies — if not for Americans’ privacy. L3Harris’ StingRay technology, which enables cell phone location tracking, is already widespread throughout the U.S. The Pegasus spyware would provide L3Harris with yet another surveillance tool to market to existing clients.

There’s plenty of evidence that law enforcement agencies would be interested. The New York Times found that the FBI bought Pegasus in 2018 and tested it for two years before ultimately deciding not to deploy the technology. In a letter describing the agency’s interest in the tool, an FBI official wrote that Pegasus could be used “for the collection of data from mobile devices for the prevention and investigation of crimes and terrorism, in compliance with privacy and national security laws.”

“As a foreign entity steeped in reputational risk and scandal, NSO tried and seemingly failed to sell to U.S. police departments,” Scott-Railton said. “But with a U.S. owner, that changes.”

The upshot for NSO is also clear: While it doesn’t guarantee the company would be removed from the entity list, it could help, since that designation was based on malicious uses of NSO’s software. “The only off-ramp is selling that software,” Jacobson said. “Then, the rest of NSO could theoretically be removed.”

In a statement to Protocol, a senior White House official said: “The US Government opposes efforts by foreign companies to circumvent US export control measures or sanctions, including placement on the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Entity List for malicious cyber activity.”

The official said the National Security Council is “working to implement a ban on U.S. government purchase or use of foreign commercial spyware that poses counterintelligence and security risks for the U.S. government or has been improperly used abroad.”

An executive order by President Biden could be the only option if the U.S. wants to stand in the way of a deal, Jacobson said. Congress isn’t likely to take up the issue in any timely manner. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States only oversees foreign investments in U.S. companies, not the other way around. And the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security governs U.S. exports, not acquisitions. “There are very few arrows in the quiver,” Jacobson said.

Allowing the deal to go forward would be an “own goal” by the Biden administration, Scott-Railton said. “If the administration pulls back or allows them to basically slip out from under this,” he said, “it will send the message: You can hack the U.S. government if you have the right backers.”


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories