A Pornhub sex trafficking lawsuit is the latest problem for the adult industry

A judge ruled that the operator of Pornhub can face a lawsuit over alleged sex trafficking. It's just the latest arrow aimed at the industry.

Brown wooden gavel on marble

Websites are finding themselves losing in court, especially if they deal with sexual content.

Photo: Tingey Injury Law Firm/Unsplash

MindGeek, which operates Pornhub and other sex sites online, can face a lawsuit from a plaintiff who claims her ex-boyfriend posted videos of them having sex when she was underage, a federal district judge in California has ruled.

The ruling found that, despite a shield in federal law that generally protects websites from liability over what users post, the suit could proceed thanks to 2018 amendments, known as FOSTA–SESTA, that sought to curb online sex trafficking. The decision quotes extensively from an August opinion allowing a similar lawsuit to proceed against Twitter, one of several recent moves that increases pressure on both the online adult entertainment industry and also on a legal shield that's prized by all kinds of internet companies.

The anonymous plaintiff, who is seeking to create a class action, alleged MindGeek violated laws pertaining to, among other issues, sex trafficking and receiving child exploitation materials because of videos that made it onto the sites. The plaintiff also alleged that MindGeek's pages "suggest and promote search terms to their users, such as 'young girls,' 'middle school girls,'" and others, according to Judge Cormac Carney.

MindGeek, which owns several massively popular websites that have become top targets of anti-porn and anti-trafficking activists alike, argued that the law only applies to actual awareness of both the trafficking and the benefit, as well as overt acts to further trafficking.

In his ruling, Carney found that the shield for websites, known as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, did not apply because of the FOSTA–SESTA legislation. Those amendments, which former President Donald Trump signed into law in 2018, allow lawsuits against sites that are benefiting from sex trafficking if the site operators should have known plaintiffs were victims of the practice, the judge ruled.

In evaluating a motion to dismiss, judges don't rule on guilt but whether plaintiffs' claims, evaluated in the best light, meet the legal standards to proceed. A spokesperson for MindGeek did not provide comment in response to a request. MindGeek has previously touted its "zero tolerance" on illegal content.

In the ruling, Carney also found MindGeek sites forfeited their Sec. 230 protections, which focus on third-party content, through "materially" contributing to the creation of allegedly offending videos. The judge cited claims that the sites "categorize their videos using coded language for child pornography" and use technology to anonymize web traffic and message privately to evade law enforcement, among others.

Sec. 230 draws a distinction between content that websites, apps or other online platforms simply host and content that they are "responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of." Yet courts have often found that the law, which was designed to protect free speech online while encouraging the elimination of the most objectionable posts, still protects platforms when they engage in a wide variety of content curation and moderation. Those activities form the basis of many social media sites.

Pressure is increasing on those models, however, particularly if they touch on controversial content. MindGeek itself faces other lawsuits, and in December, Pornhub specifically was the subject of a blockbuster New York Times op-ed that alleged it was profiting from videos of exploitation. The site changed many policies in response, including banning videos from unverified accounts and launching a new biometric verification system, but credit card companies cut ties with the company and at least one lawmaker has called for a Justice Department investigation of the site.

In August, OnlyFans, which allows creators to post their own explicit videos, also said it would be prohibiting a large swath of sexual content, citing the necessity "to secure banking and payment services." The company had reportedly struggled to find investors, and it was the subject of a bipartisan letter from more than 100 lawmakers urging a Justice Department probe. Still, amid outcry from sex workers, it reversed the adult content ban days later.

Another federal judge in California recently ruled Twitter can face a lawsuit from two boys who allege the platform did not immediately remove a sexual video of them made under duress while they were minors when one of them informed Twitter about it. The judge cited that ruling in his decision against MindGeek.

Free speech advocates, adult creators and tech firms also argue that anti-porn activists are using a small number of horrific cases and nebulous terms like "benefit" and "venture" in anti-trafficking law as part of a push to make legal porn economically impossible. The anti-porn and anti-trafficking activists are also seeking to pressure conversations over encrypted platforms, free-speech advocates say.

Lawsuits are just one point of pressure on the internet porn apparatus. Anti-trafficking groups have sought to push the advantage they gained with the passage of FOSTA–SESTA by helping to file suits, such as the one against Twitter. The groups also aim to amp up the public relations headaches that sex sites can cause to credit cards and other internet infrastructure providers, which have sometimes chosen to stop working with adult content providers as a result.

In the quarter-century since its passage, Sec. 230 has essentially provided the legal foundation of the modern internet. Court rulings emphasized free speech and sites' discretion to balance their commercial interests with their moderation goals, even when there were few of the latter.

Now, however, companies such as Twitter, Snap, Craigslist and others have recently lost in court when trying to have claims against them dismissed under the provision. Although some of the rulings related to sexual content and sprang from FOSTA, others, such as the Snap lawsuit, related to design features. Conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who frequently alleges a bias against right-wing voices by tech companies, even wrote last year that the high court should take up the law for the first time and rein it in.


Kraken CEO defends his ‘back to dictatorship’ crackdown

Jesse Powell says the crypto exchange’s cultural revolution was necessary.

"Some people feel they should be able to be whatever they want to be in the workplace. But there's a line," Powell told Protocol.

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Kraken CEO Jesse Powell found himself under fire last month for provocative remarks he made that kicked off a contentious workplace battle and shined a light on the crypto exchange’s distinctive corporate culture.

A New York Times report based on leaked Slack messages and employee interviews accused Powell of making insensitive comments on gender and race, sparking heated conversations within Kraken. Powell responded forcefully, laying out new ground rules and principles in an attempt to define the way he wanted the company to operate — sharply at odds in some aspects with the tech industry’s standard practices.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

GitHub’s CEO wants to go passwordless by 2025

Thomas Dohmke sat down with Protocol to talk about what the open-source code hosting site is doing to address security vulnerabilities, including an aim to go passwordless by 2025.

GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke spoke to Protocol about its plan to go passwordless.

Photo: Vaughn Ridley/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke wants to get rid of passwords.

Open-source software has been plagued with cybersecurity issues for years, and GitHub and other companies in the space have been taking steps to bolster security. Dohmke knows, however, that to get to the root of the industrywide problem will take more than just corporate action: It will ultimately require a sea change and cultural shift in how developers work.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.


Why foundation models in AI need to be released responsibly

Foundation models like GPT-3 and DALL-E are changing AI forever. We urgently need to develop community norms that guarantee research access and help guide the future of AI responsibly.

Releasing new foundation models doesn’t have to be an all or nothing proposition.

Illustration: sorbetto/DigitalVision Vectors

Percy Liang is director of the Center for Research on Foundation Models, a faculty affiliate at the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI and an associate professor of Computer Science at Stanford University.

Humans are not very good at forecasting the future, especially when it comes to technology.

Keep Reading Show less
Percy Liang
Percy Liang is Director of the Center for Research on Foundation Models, a Faculty Affiliate at the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI, and an Associate Professor of Computer Science at Stanford University.

The West’s drought could bring about a data center reckoning

When it comes to water use, data centers are the tech industry’s secret water hogs — and they could soon come under increased scrutiny.

Lake Mead, North America's largest artificial reservoir, has dropped to about 1,052 feet above sea level, the lowest it's been since being filled in 1937.

Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images

The West is parched, and getting more so by the day. Lake Mead — the country’s largest reservoir — is nearing “dead pool” levels, meaning it may soon be too low to flow downstream. The entirety of the Four Corners plus California is mired in megadrought.

Amid this desiccation, hundreds of the country’s data centers use vast amounts of water to hum along. Dozens cluster around major metro centers, including those with mandatory or voluntary water restrictions in place to curtail residential and agricultural use.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Latest Stories