Republican pushback to the Biden tech agenda is getting personal

Biden's nominee to the FTC got called a "bomb-thrower" at a Thursday hearing, while an FCC pick faces a "rocky road."

President Joe Biden at a podium.

GOP lawmakers are growing concerned with the FTC's plans to regulate privacy and the return of the net neutrality battle at the FCC.

Photo: Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Jessica Rosenworcel, currently acting chair of the Federal Communications Commission, fielded the lion's share of questions during a Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday.

Rosenworcel, who has been tapped to take over the agency officially, has already spent several years on the commission. Historically she concentrates on issues such as the so-called homework gap and broadband accessibility, which have bipartisan appeal, and so avoided most of the controversy. Republicans instead trained their fire on Alvaro Bedoya, a longtime privacy lawyer whom President Joe Biden named to the Federal Trade Commission, as GOP policymakers grow increasingly personal criticizing the commission's progressive turn under FTC chair Lina Khan.

Sen. Roger Wicker, the top Republican on the Senate Commerce Committee, said in his introductory remarks, for instance, that Bedoya's habit of expressing "strident views on public policy matters that should be resolved through consultation and collaboration" was a concern.

"I fear that this pattern calls into question his ability to work in a collaborative manner with the other FTC commissioners on critical issues," Wicker said.

At one point, Republican Sen. Ted Cruz went farther, calling Bedoya "a left-wing activist, a provocateur, a bomb-thrower and an extremist."

Bedoya pledged to work on behalf of all Americans at the commission, citing his bipartisan work as a Senate Judiciary Committee staffer, including talks with Cruz's office. The concerns of Wicker and his colleagues, who also dug into Bedoya's past tweets, however, came as some in the GOP are increasingly agitated about FTC chair Lina Khan's sprawling agenda to push back on corporate concentration and regulate Big Tech. Bedoya would likely support the moves as the FTC's third Democratic commissioner.

The FTC's current Democrats, for instance, have all but declared they want to issue rules governing data abuses, privacy and artificial intelligence. Asked about a possible rule-making related to data, Bedoya said he supported the FTC's use of its authority to regulate prevalent unfair or deceptive acts, and suggested a particular focus on sensitive data.

Federal lawmakers have mostly failed for decades to pass laws protecting data, but the FTC's efforts threaten to reignite the decades-long cycle of blowback from businesses and lawmakers, especially Republicans, who have previously viewed FTC rule-making as overreach.

Additionally, Congressional Democrats are also eyeing a dramatic increase in funding for the FTC and the creation of a bureau to take charge of privacy specifically as part of their massive social spending proposal.

Sen. Mike Lee, a leading Republican critic of Khan, asked Bedoya if there were limits on the FTC's regulatory powers, and suggested the agency should focus on enforcing the law against particular bad actors rather than issuing sectorwide rules. Bedoya responded that he would respect legal guardrails but that the agency should use the tools it has, prompting Lee to call the lack of clear yes-or-no answers "deeply concerning."

In some cases, the Republican criticism of Khan's agenda has also come from her colleagues. Commissioner Christine Wilson told a gathering of antitrust lawyers earlier this month, for instance, that Khan's philosophy, particularly her view of competition, "is likely to fail." Wilson also suggested that the commission's Democrats are preparing a "rule-making binge," flouting Congress and the courts, and taking actions that could threaten the whole FTC and do damage to the U.S. economy.

"I speak out because I am fighting for what I hold dear," Wilson said.

Glaring absence

The hearing also was notable for who wasn't there: Gigi Sohn, a net-neutrality advocate who Biden nominated to the FCC at the same time he put up Rosenworcel for the position of chair. Despite the nominations coinciding, Sohn's confirmation hearing is still pending and there are signs she faces a fight to get approval.

During a prior stint as an agency staffer, Sohn was instrumental to designing the FCC's 2015 net-neutrality order, which banned internet service providers from blocking web content, slowing it down or demanding pay for prioritizing it. While some conservatives who are fed up with Big Tech have started flirting with more progressive views on antitrust, Republican lawmakers remain nearly united in decrying the net-neutrality order as one of the more egregious examples of Democratic policy overreach in recent times.

The Republican-majority FCC infamously overrode the measure during the Trump administration, and Sohn's nomination, alongside Biden's calls for net neutrality, suggest the fight is likely to begin again — a possibility that provided a few awkward moments for Rosenworcel.

Top Republican members of the Commerce Committee have also suggested they're opposed to Sohn joining the FCC. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, who is close to Trump and often signals GOP positions on issues and nominees, recently called Sohn "a complete political ideologue who has disdain for conservatives."

When asked if Sohn could get any support from the conference, a Republican congressional aide told Protocol: "We anticipate a rocky road."

Because of the partisan breakdown of the current Senate, if GOP distaste for Sohn makes it impossible for her to get any Republican support, she would need all the Democrats to give her confirmation a thumbs-up. Moderates in the caucus haven't been shy about bucking some of the White House's other picks, though.

In addition, even slow wrangling of votes could threaten Biden's agenda, including the rollout of billions in funding for broadband under the new infrastructure law, some of which the FCC will oversee.

Rosenworcel must leave by year's end if she's not confirmed, and successful confirmation votes can easily come weeks or more after even friendly hearings. Without Rosenworcel and Sohn, the FCC would have a Republican majority, despite serving under a Democratic administration.

Many congressional Democrats have been openly frustrated with the White House because of Biden's delays in making his nominations.

"My only frustration with Commissioner Rosenworcel's nomination is that it was not done in March," said Democratic Sen. Ben Ray Luján. "This is long overdue."


Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.


The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories