How Meta, Google, Twitter and TikTok are 'failing' LGBTQ+ users

A new GLAAD report finds that the biggest social media companies still lack basic policies to protect LGBTQ+ communities.

A close up photos of the trans and pride flags.

"The entire industry is failing LGBTQ people when it comes to security.”

Photo: Cecilie Johnsen/Unsplash

Tech giants spent the month of June touting their contributions to LGBTQ+ communities around the world. But a new report from GLAAD finds that the five most popular social media platforms — Facebook, Instagram, Google, TikTok and Twitter — have policies that make their platforms unsafe for LGBTQ+ users.

GLAAD’s Social Media Safety Index, which is in its second year, scored Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram and TikTok on a range of policies, from prohibiting targeted deadnaming and misgendering of transgender and non-binary people to offering queer-specific training to content moderators. None of the platforms scored higher than 50% against GLAAD’s benchmarks.

“The main takeaway from all this is that the entire industry is failing LGBTQ people when it comes to security,” said Jenni Olson, senior director of the GLAAD Social Media Safety Index. “The biggest target, particularly in recent months, has been trans folks.”

In recent weeks, the actor Elliot Page has been the subject of targeted misgendering and deadnaming by conservative commentators on Twitter, leading to the actor’s deadname appearing in the top trends, despite the platform's own policy banning deadnaming. Offline, hate crimes against trans people are rising. In 2021, the Human Rights Campaign recorded fatal violence against 57 transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals in the U.S. In England and Wales, government statistics showed that hate crimes based on sexual orientation doubled between 2016 and 2021.

While all of the companies have written policies stating their commitment to LGBTQ+ users, some of them lack even the most foundational policies that GLAAD says are crucial to keeping that commitment. YouTube, Instagram and Facebook, for instance, have no policies against targeted deadnaming on their platforms. Twitter and YouTube, meanwhile, failed to meet GLAAD’s standards on both training for content moderators and having specific features for users to add pronouns to their profiles, along with privacy settings that control who sees users' pronouns.

GLAAD scored the companies, which are all current or former financial backers of the organization, based on their publicly stated policies, not their enforcement of those policies, which is not easily measurable by outside researchers.

GLAAD’s findings build on a survey of hate speech online by the Anti-Defamation League, which found that 66% of LGBTQ+ respondents have experienced harassment online, with 53% of respondents attributing the harassment to their sexual orientation.

Google didn’t respond to Protocol’s request for comment. TikTok spokesperson AB Obi-Okoye said in a statement that the platform is "committed to supporting and uplifting LGBTQ+ voices, and we work hard to create an inclusive environment for LGBTQ+ people to thrive." Meta spokesperson Erin McPike said, “We prohibit violent or dehumanizing content directed against people who identify as LGBTQ+ and remove claims about someone’s gender identity upon their request. We also work closely with our partners in the civil rights community to identify additional measures we can implement through our products and policies.” And Twitter spokesperson Elizabeth Busby said, "We are committed to combating abuse motivated by hatred, prejudice or intolerance, particularly abuse that seeks to silence the voices of those who have been historically marginalized." Busby noted that GLAAD serves on Twitter's Trust and Safety Council.

This year is the first that GLAAD is assigning specific scores to the platforms. Last year, the organization determined that all the five platforms “are categorically unsafe” and would receive failing grades. Since then, TikTok agreed to update its policies, adding the prohibition of “content that targets transgender or non-binary individuals through misgendering or deadnaming.” But progress has otherwise been largely stagnant.

Outside the U.S., tech companies also face new legislation and pressure that could lead to further censorship of LGBTQ+ users, including in Ghana where a proposed law would ban positively discussing queer life online, and in Saudi Arabia, where the government successfully pressured Amazon to remove LGBTQ+-related products and books.

GLAAD recommends that all platforms institute policies banning targeted deadnaming and misgendering and prohibiting advertising based on information about users’ sexual orientation and gender identity. The organization is also calling for increased transparency by the platforms themselves. But Olson argues the U.S. government needs to step forward on the regulatory front as well, pointing to the EU’s GDPR legislation, which governs how tech companies collect and use customer personal information, and the recently approved Digital Services Act that would police harmful content online.

“The time has come for regulatory solutions, industry oversight,” Olson said. “Social media platforms and so many other tech firms are underregulated, and that's part of the reason that they are so unsafe.”


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories