Policy

Spectrum is forcing full-price plans on people seeking FCC benefit

Spectrum is requiring people to opt in to continue service at full price in order to enroll in the FCC's Emergency Broadband Benefit program.

The FCC is looking into Spectrum's discount-broadband offering.

The FCC is looking into Spectrum's discount-broadband offering.

Photoillustration: Rafael Henrique/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Spectrum is forcing customers who are eligible for a new federal subsidy for internet service to opt in to full-price plans once the subsidy runs out. The policy appears to skirt rules set forth by the Federal Communications Commission, which is running the Emergency Broadband Benefit program.

The $3.2 billion emergency broadband benefit, which launched earlier this month, gives people up to $50 off of their monthly internet bill. The stopgap funding was allocated in response to the pandemic and is expected to run out within the year. To protect people from being automatically enrolled in more expensive plans once the money runs out, the FCC required internet service providers to give consumers notice that the program is about to end and get customers' explicit consent before continuing their service at a higher price.

Spectrum, however, appears to be doing the inverse. Rather than giving potential applicants the option to continue their coverage at full-price, it's requiring them to do so in order to receive the benefit at all.

"Yes, customers opt in at the time of enrollment to continue receiving service once the program ends," Charter spokesperson Rich Ruggiero told Protocol on Tuesday. "Customers will receive notice 30 days before the program ends, and can make a decision about keeping or terminating their service."

Paloma Perez, a spokesperson for the FCC, said internet service providers "must collect that opt-in affirmation to continue providing the broadband service after the program ends, but they may do so at the time of EBB enrollment." But it's unclear whether a forced opt-in complies with the FCC's rules.

"If participating [Emergency Broadband Benefit] providers are making it harder for consumers to receive the support they need to get online, they need to knock it off," acting FCC chair Jessica Rosenworcel told Protocol. "I urge consumers who have faced this issue to come to us and share their experience at consumercomplaints.fcc.gov. It's one of the swiftest ways we can get to the bottom of what is going on and address it."

Requiring people to opt in in order to even enroll in the benefit program opens the possibility that people could forget to cancel their plans and be hit with higher monthly fees, which is what the FCC hoped to avoid with these rules. The Emergency Broadband Benefit is intended for low-income Americans, people living on tribal lands and people whose income was impacted by the pandemic.

In a frequently asked questions section of the Spectrum website, which lays out facts about the Emergency Broadband Benefit, Spectrum warns customers that when the emergency broadband benefit program ends, enrollees in that program will "continue to receive Spectrum Internet service at the undiscounted monthly rate of the plan you selected, subject to Spectrum's terms and conditions, which includes the right to terminate anytime without penalty."

As of Tuesday, two weeks into the program's implementation and after more than 1 million people had enrolled in the Emergency Broadband Benefit, Spectrum's FAQs made no mention of the opt-in requirement. Instead, the FAQ says, "We'll alert you of the last date or billing cycle that will include this benefit program. We'll also tell you if you qualify for a partial month benefit and the cost of your service after the program ends."

The FCC's Perez told Protocol that the commission is in contact with Charter "to ensure its webpage more accurately represents the FCC rules regarding the need for consumers to affirmatively opt in to continuing to receive internet service from Charter once the Emergency Broadband Benefit program concludes."

Digital equity advocates have been on the lookout for ISPs trying to impose hidden costs, fees and requirements on enrollees in the program. Last week, The Washington Post reported that Verizon was requiring existing customers to sign up for sometimes more expensive plans in order to receive the emergency funding.

"I'm sure we're going to hear more stories like this," Angela Siefer, executive director of the National Digital Inclusion Alliance, said about the Post's reporting at the time.

Siefer said that a key part of convincing people to sign up for the program is helping them understand the protections the FCC has put in place for consumers, including the opt-in requirement.

Update: This story has been updated to include additional comment from Charter and the FCC acting chair

Fintech

Election markets are far from a sure bet

Kalshi has big-name backing for its plan to offer futures contracts tied to election results. Will that win over a long-skeptical regulator?

Whether Kalshi’s election contracts could be considered gaming or whether they serve a true risk-hedging purpose is one of the top questions the CFTC is weighing in its review.

Photo illustration: Getty Images; Protocol

Crypto isn’t the only emerging issue on the CFTC’s plate. The futures regulator is also weighing a fintech sector that has similarly tricky political implications: election bets.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has set Oct. 28 as a date by which it hopes to decide whether the New York-based startup Kalshi can offer a form of wagering up to $25,000 on which party will control the House of Representatives and Senate after the midterms. PredictIt, another online market for election trading, has also sued the regulator over its decision to cancel a no-action letter.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Enterprise

The Uber verdict shows why mandatory disclosure isn't such a bad idea

The conviction of Uber's former chief security officer, Joe Sullivan, seems likely to change some minds in the debate over proposed cyber incident reporting regulations.

Executives and boards will now be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up," said one information security veteran.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

If nothing else, the guilty verdict delivered Wednesday in a case involving Uber's former security head will have this effect on how breaches are handled in the future: Executives and boards, according to information security veteran Michael Hamilton, will be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up."

Following the conviction of former Uber chief security officer Joe Sullivan, "we likely will get better voluntary reporting" of cyber incidents, said Hamilton, formerly the chief information security officer of the City of Seattle, and currently the founder and CISO at cybersecurity vendor Critical Insight.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.

Climate

Delta and MIT are running flight tests to fix contrails

The research team and airline are running flight tests to determine if it’s possible to avoid the climate-warming effects of contrails.

Delta and MIT just announced a partnership to test how to mitigate persistent contrails.

Photo: Gabriela Natiello/Unsplash

Contrails could be responsible for up to 2% of all global warming, and yet how they’re formed and how to mitigate them is barely understood by major airlines.

That may be changing.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Entertainment

Inside Amazon’s free video strategy

Amazon has been doubling down on original content for Freevee, its ad-supported video service, which has seen a lot of growth thanks to a deep integration with other Amazon properties.

Freevee’s investment into original programming like 'Bosch: Legacy' has increased by 70%.

Photo: Tyler Golden/Amazon Freevee

Amazon’s streaming efforts have long been all about Prime Video. So the company caught pundits by surprise when, in early 2019, it launched a stand-alone ad-supported streaming service called IMDb Freedive, with Techcrunch calling the move “a bit odd.”

Nearly four years and two rebrandings later, Amazon’s ad-supported video efforts appear to be flourishing. Viewership of the service grew by 138% from 2020 to 2021, according to Amazon. The company declined to share any updated performance data on the service, which is now called Freevee, but a spokesperson told Protocol the performance of originals in particular “exceeded expectations,” leading Amazon to increase investments into original content by 70% year-over-year.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Latest Stories
Bulletins