Tech companies are figuring out how to respond to a post-Roe v. Wade world

From data privacy to abortion care benefits, tech companies are stepping into a minefield.

Supreme Court

Businesses will need to contend with the legal fallout of a post-Roe world, in which more than 24 states are expected to ban or restrict abortion.

Photo: Claire Anderson via Unsplash

The world before the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade is almost incomparable to today in every material way. Five decades later, as SCOTUS prepares to overturn Roe, the role of tech companies and platforms will be profound.

Businesses will need to contend with the legal fallout of a post-Roe world, in which more than 24 states are expected to ban or restrict abortion. Tech companies that collect user data or offer services will be subject to scrutiny.

The draft ruling isn’t finalized and could change dramatically when it’s handed down in June, but tech companies are already responding to the possibility — and the challenges they’ll face in the aftermath.

How are tech companies responding to the potential overturn of Roe v. Wade?

Tech companies have so far been quiet on the draft ruling. One gaming company, Bungie, spoke out against the potential ruling. Uber and Lyft said they’d cover legal fees for drivers who face legal trouble in states with restrictive abortion laws.

Abortion-related travel coverage and relocation will become key issues for tech companies in the wake of Roe v. Wade. Companies including Yelp, Amazon, Match Group and Bumble have already promised to reimburse workers who travel for abortions.

Dozens of tech companies are headquartered in states prepared to ban or heavily restrict abortion, and almost every big tech company has some presence in those states. Individual workers may choose to leave a state — which Slack said it would help with — but the issue is trickier for companies. It’s too early to determine whether relocation would be feasible in most cases.

What are the legal issues that tech companies face if Roe v. Wade is overturned?

Tech companies are in a difficult position. If and when the Supreme Court ruling becomes final, law enforcement may come calling for user data to prosecute people for seeking abortions.

The implications are far-reaching. What happens when Facebook is subpoenaed for the IP address of an abortion rights group administrator? What happens when Google allows advertisers to target abortion-related content toward users in states where it’s outlawed? What about ride-hailing apps that facilitate rides to abortion clinics? Protocol’s Ben Brody pointed out that these companies could resist requests from law enforcement, especially if the demands are particularly broad, but the case-by-case nature of the requests could quickly become a logistical nightmare — and a privacy one for users.

Which states are preparing for the overturn of Roe v. Wade?

Thirteen states have trigger laws banning abortion that immediately go into effect if Roe vs. Wade is overturned, while 14 have restrictive abortion laws that will kick in. Meanwhile, California Governor Gavin Newsom announced an amendment that would codify abortion rights into California’s constitution. The state had announced plans previously to become a “sanctuary” for people seeking abortions from out of the state, including helping out with costs such as medical bills, transportation, child care and lost wages.

How could technology put user data at risk?

User data is already bought and sold by brokers to help companies effectively target ads. In a post-Roe world, that data, which includes location of a person’s phone, the apps they use and what they search for on Google, could easily be de-anonymized and linked to users seeking to obtain an abortion.

Location data broker SafeGraph admitted to selling data on abortion clinic visits, though the company later said it didn’t realize that data was available to its clients. The data points included how long a person stayed at a clinic and where they traveled to and from. Another location data firm, Placer.ai, offered access to the same sort of information to advertisers, government customers and others for years.

Period-tracking apps store users’ self-reported data about cycles, medication and sexual activity, and while some have privacy policies that promise to keep that data private, the apps could be subpoenaed by law enforcement in states where abortion is illegal.

“Individuals using femtech, health tech and related apps should be wary about trusting these app developers’ data collection and privacy practices,” said Lourdes M. Turrecha, founder of The Rise of Privacy Tech.

Privacy experts said one way to prevent third-party access to menstrual cycle data is to store the information locally on the device instead of in the cloud. Some period-tracking apps, like Spot On and Euki, already do so.

How are platforms handling the spread of information about abortion resources?

Nonprofit and activist organizations and users are using social media to share information and resources. Gen-Z For Change has posted a series of TikTok videos breaking down the news for a younger audience, as well as discussing resources and protests. Planned Parenthood Action Fund, the advocacy and political arm of Planned Parenthood, has also covered protests and explained the significance of overturning Roe v. Wade on TikTok, Instagram and Twitter.

But given the tight content moderation rules on TikTok, some are being careful when speaking up on the issue. Strategies include switching out letters for numbers and symbols in certain captioned words so they don’t get flagged. Cosmopolitan made a TikTok where the voiceover and background video discussed Kim Kardashian’s dress at Monday’s Met Gala, while captioning the video with information about the SCOTUS opinion and where to find resources.

What digital tools are nonprofits and health care companies preparing to provide?

Nonprofits supporting people seeking abortions are preparing for an influx in calls and requests. The National Abortion Federation, which offers financial, travel and case management assistance for people seeking care out of their state, is restructuring its case management model to better serve people in states where abortion is limited or banned, as well as building “mechanisms to understand clinic capacity” by collecting data on appointment availability to get travelers the earliest appointments available.

“We are working now to understand what the hurdles are,” Veronica Jones, the nonprofit’s chief operating officer, told Protocol.

Alongside its hotline, the organization also has an online map to help users find abortion care. Some hotlines are also available via text, such as the M+A Hotline, which also offers resources online on how to get and use abortion pills. Online abortion clinics like Hey Jane and Choix are expecting a surge in interest as brick-and-mortar facilities potentially become overwhelmed.


This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).


White House AI Bill of Rights lacks specific guidance for AI rules

The document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is long on tech guidance, but short on restrictions for AI.

While the document provides extensive suggestions for how to incorporate AI rights in technical design, it does not include any recommendations for restrictions on the use of controversial forms of AI.

Photo: Ana Lanza/Unsplash

It was a year in the making, but people eagerly anticipating the White House Bill of Rights for AI will have to continue waiting for concrete recommendations for future AI policy or restrictions.

Instead, the document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is legally non-binding and intended to be used as a handbook and a “guide for society” that could someday inform government AI legislation or regulations.

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights features a list of five guidelines for protecting people in relation to AI use:

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories