Policy

Tech giants are staying silent on California’s anti-NDA bill

Facebook, Apple, Google and Twitter are keeping quiet about the Silenced No More Act, even as a major trade organization fights against it.

California’s state assembly room, empty

California's state assembly could soon pass a bill to prohibit certain types of NDAs.

Photo: Slobo/Getty Images

A California bill to outlaw non-disclosure agreements that prohibit employees from talking about illegal harassment and discrimination is inching toward a final vote in the California legislature after clearing a key committee this week. But many of the top tech companies that call California home are staying silent on the bill — even as their major trade association in the state vocally opposes it.

The Silenced No More Act, introduced by state Sen. Connie Leyva this year, broadens a law called the STAND Act that freed workers to talk specifically about sexual harassment and gender discrimination. Facebook, Google and Twitter all told Protocol they had no position on the bill. Apple did not respond to Protocol's request for comment. Two leading tech trade groups, Internet Association and TechNet, also declined to take a position when asked by Protocol.

Even as some of California's most powerful companies withhold public comment on a law that would affect not just their full-time staff, but the armies of contract workers whom they indirectly employ in the state, the California Chamber of Commerce, which represents 14,000 businesses including Facebook and Google, has mounted a full-throated opposition campaign against the bill.

Their argument: The bill will inadvertently hurt employees by discouraging employers from paying severance packages altogether.

"This double threat of costly litigation for offering a severance agreement that potentially violates any of these requirements will certainly discourage employers from offering severance packages," CalChamber and other trade groups wrote to two Assembly committees this month in a letter reviewed by Protocol. "The point of a severance agreement is to eliminate the risk of claims and litigation, not invite multiple threats of litigation." CalChamber did not respond to Protocol's request for comment.

To Ifeoma Ozoma, a former Pinterest employee who helped draft the law after speaking out about her own allegations of discrimination and retaliation at Pinterest, the Chamber's logic is strained. The law, she said, would only prohibit NDAs that prevent employees from talking about "unlawful acts," and would still allow companies to reach agreements with employees to release their legal claims.

"Companies aren't just paying for people to be quiet. They're paying for people not to sue them," Ozoma said. "If you believe your severance payment is unlawful in and of itself, that's a conversation you should be having among yourselves."

Business groups made much the same case before the passage of the STAND Act, but both Ozoma and Leyva said they've yet to see any evidence that that law has had an impact on severance payouts. "This is the same argument they made with [the STAND Act] and none of it has come to light," Leyva said.

Ozoma, who worked at both Facebook and Google before Pinterest, called tech companies' reticence on the bill "curious" given their recent statements on issues related to race in America. The Silenced No More Act is the first bill that would give people the ability to talk publicly not just about gender discrimination, but also about racial discrimination, even if they're under an NDA.

"They've made a lot of statements about how they support Black lives, women and all their diversity initiatives," Ozoma said. "I just think it's really curious that they've been silent about an issue that cuts to the heart of what they claim their morals are."

Leyva said the industry's silence "speaks volumes" and suggests they're "wanting to just stand back and let the Chamber do the dirty work for them."

CalChamber's position on the bill doesn't necessarily reflect the views of all of its members, of course. But for members who don't want to face the public relations backlash for speaking out against the bill themselves, the Chamber provides a convenient cover, Ozoma, who worked for the policy teams at Facebook, Google and Pinterest, said.

"They're pretty vocal about legislation. They have a whole team of people tracking legislation, so it can't be that they don't know this is happening," she said. "I really think the silence is not accidental."

NDAs are hardly scarce in the tech industry; visitors can barely walk in the door at top tech companies without signing away their right to talk. For employees, NDAs are similarly pervasive. And yet the only tech company to say anything publicly about the bill has been Pinterest, which has sought to answer for the issues Ozoma and her former colleague Aerica Shimizu Banks described regarding their time at the company.

Pinterest told Protocol in April — the same day Ozoma published an op-ed about the bill in The New York Times — that it supports the Silenced No More Act and would no longer impose agreements that prevent employees from talking about their experiences. But Pinterest didn't go so far as to release former employees from such agreements, and the company hasn't spoken in support of the bill at any of its recent hearings. (Pinterest didn't respond to Protocol's request for comment.)

Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda told Protocol that the company wasn't involved with the CalChamber's decision to oppose the bill, but Google hasn't come out in support of it either. Google said that it has not historically asked employees to sign NDAs that prevent them from talking about workplace conditions.

But the same hasn't been true for Google's contractors, some of whom recently sued Google and one of its staffing firms for the right to discuss their wages and working conditions. As part of its settlement with workers, Google promised to put signs up in its data centers, alerting workers that they can discuss wages and working conditions "with other employees."

Facebook's content moderators in Ireland, meanwhile, told the Guardian in February that they were warned not to break their NDAs when describing COVID-19 working conditions during a meeting with the country's deputy prime minister. Some Facebook moderators in Florida have in the past put themselves at legal risk, violating the terms of their NDAs to speak to members of the press. While the Silenced No More Act would only apply to workers in California, lawmakers in Ireland, where many tech giants have their global headquarters, are considering a similar law with Ozoma's input.

The California Assembly still needs to hold a vote to pass the bill, and the Senate will have to sign off on any amendments they made before it heads to the governor's desk. Leyva, for one, doesn't anticipate any issues. "Anyone who voted for it the first time in the Senate should have no problem voting for it again," she said.

Fintech

Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep Reading Show less
FTA
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.
Enterprise

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep Reading Show less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.

Enterprise

Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins