Tech giants are staying silent on California’s anti-NDA bill

Facebook, Apple, Google and Twitter are keeping quiet about the Silenced No More Act, even as a major trade organization fights against it.

California’s state assembly room, empty

California's state assembly could soon pass a bill to prohibit certain types of NDAs.

Photo: Slobo/Getty Images

A California bill to outlaw non-disclosure agreements that prohibit employees from talking about illegal harassment and discrimination is inching toward a final vote in the California legislature after clearing a key committee this week. But many of the top tech companies that call California home are staying silent on the bill — even as their major trade association in the state vocally opposes it.

The Silenced No More Act, introduced by state Sen. Connie Leyva this year, broadens a law called the STAND Act that freed workers to talk specifically about sexual harassment and gender discrimination. Facebook, Google and Twitter all told Protocol they had no position on the bill. Apple did not respond to Protocol's request for comment. Two leading tech trade groups, Internet Association and TechNet, also declined to take a position when asked by Protocol.

Even as some of California's most powerful companies withhold public comment on a law that would affect not just their full-time staff, but the armies of contract workers whom they indirectly employ in the state, the California Chamber of Commerce, which represents 14,000 businesses including Facebook and Google, has mounted a full-throated opposition campaign against the bill.

Their argument: The bill will inadvertently hurt employees by discouraging employers from paying severance packages altogether.

"This double threat of costly litigation for offering a severance agreement that potentially violates any of these requirements will certainly discourage employers from offering severance packages," CalChamber and other trade groups wrote to two Assembly committees this month in a letter reviewed by Protocol. "The point of a severance agreement is to eliminate the risk of claims and litigation, not invite multiple threats of litigation." CalChamber did not respond to Protocol's request for comment.

To Ifeoma Ozoma, a former Pinterest employee who helped draft the law after speaking out about her own allegations of discrimination and retaliation at Pinterest, the Chamber's logic is strained. The law, she said, would only prohibit NDAs that prevent employees from talking about "unlawful acts," and would still allow companies to reach agreements with employees to release their legal claims.

"Companies aren't just paying for people to be quiet. They're paying for people not to sue them," Ozoma said. "If you believe your severance payment is unlawful in and of itself, that's a conversation you should be having among yourselves."

Business groups made much the same case before the passage of the STAND Act, but both Ozoma and Leyva said they've yet to see any evidence that that law has had an impact on severance payouts. "This is the same argument they made with [the STAND Act] and none of it has come to light," Leyva said.

Ozoma, who worked at both Facebook and Google before Pinterest, called tech companies' reticence on the bill "curious" given their recent statements on issues related to race in America. The Silenced No More Act is the first bill that would give people the ability to talk publicly not just about gender discrimination, but also about racial discrimination, even if they're under an NDA.

"They've made a lot of statements about how they support Black lives, women and all their diversity initiatives," Ozoma said. "I just think it's really curious that they've been silent about an issue that cuts to the heart of what they claim their morals are."

Leyva said the industry's silence "speaks volumes" and suggests they're "wanting to just stand back and let the Chamber do the dirty work for them."

CalChamber's position on the bill doesn't necessarily reflect the views of all of its members, of course. But for members who don't want to face the public relations backlash for speaking out against the bill themselves, the Chamber provides a convenient cover, Ozoma, who worked for the policy teams at Facebook, Google and Pinterest, said.

"They're pretty vocal about legislation. They have a whole team of people tracking legislation, so it can't be that they don't know this is happening," she said. "I really think the silence is not accidental."

NDAs are hardly scarce in the tech industry; visitors can barely walk in the door at top tech companies without signing away their right to talk. For employees, NDAs are similarly pervasive. And yet the only tech company to say anything publicly about the bill has been Pinterest, which has sought to answer for the issues Ozoma and her former colleague Aerica Shimizu Banks described regarding their time at the company.

Pinterest told Protocol in April — the same day Ozoma published an op-ed about the bill in The New York Times — that it supports the Silenced No More Act and would no longer impose agreements that prevent employees from talking about their experiences. But Pinterest didn't go so far as to release former employees from such agreements, and the company hasn't spoken in support of the bill at any of its recent hearings. (Pinterest didn't respond to Protocol's request for comment.)

Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda told Protocol that the company wasn't involved with the CalChamber's decision to oppose the bill, but Google hasn't come out in support of it either. Google said that it has not historically asked employees to sign NDAs that prevent them from talking about workplace conditions.

But the same hasn't been true for Google's contractors, some of whom recently sued Google and one of its staffing firms for the right to discuss their wages and working conditions. As part of its settlement with workers, Google promised to put signs up in its data centers, alerting workers that they can discuss wages and working conditions "with other employees."

Facebook's content moderators in Ireland, meanwhile, told the Guardian in February that they were warned not to break their NDAs when describing COVID-19 working conditions during a meeting with the country's deputy prime minister. Some Facebook moderators in Florida have in the past put themselves at legal risk, violating the terms of their NDAs to speak to members of the press. While the Silenced No More Act would only apply to workers in California, lawmakers in Ireland, where many tech giants have their global headquarters, are considering a similar law with Ozoma's input.

The California Assembly still needs to hold a vote to pass the bill, and the Senate will have to sign off on any amendments they made before it heads to the governor's desk. Leyva, for one, doesn't anticipate any issues. "Anyone who voted for it the first time in the Senate should have no problem voting for it again," she said.


Election markets are far from a sure bet

Kalshi has big-name backing for its plan to offer futures contracts tied to election results. Will that win over a long-skeptical regulator?

Whether Kalshi’s election contracts could be considered gaming or whether they serve a true risk-hedging purpose is one of the top questions the CFTC is weighing in its review.

Photo illustration: Getty Images; Protocol

Crypto isn’t the only emerging issue on the CFTC’s plate. The futures regulator is also weighing a fintech sector that has similarly tricky political implications: election bets.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has set Oct. 28 as a date by which it hopes to decide whether the New York-based startup Kalshi can offer a form of wagering up to $25,000 on which party will control the House of Representatives and Senate after the midterms. PredictIt, another online market for election trading, has also sued the regulator over its decision to cancel a no-action letter.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

The Uber verdict shows why mandatory disclosure isn't such a bad idea

The conviction of Uber's former chief security officer, Joe Sullivan, seems likely to change some minds in the debate over proposed cyber incident reporting regulations.

Executives and boards will now be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up," said one information security veteran.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

If nothing else, the guilty verdict delivered Wednesday in a case involving Uber's former security head will have this effect on how breaches are handled in the future: Executives and boards, according to information security veteran Michael Hamilton, will be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up."

Following the conviction of former Uber chief security officer Joe Sullivan, "we likely will get better voluntary reporting" of cyber incidents, said Hamilton, formerly the chief information security officer of the City of Seattle, and currently the founder and CISO at cybersecurity vendor Critical Insight.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.


Delta and MIT are running flight tests to fix contrails

The research team and airline are running flight tests to determine if it’s possible to avoid the climate-warming effects of contrails.

Delta and MIT just announced a partnership to test how to mitigate persistent contrails.

Photo: Gabriela Natiello/Unsplash

Contrails could be responsible for up to 2% of all global warming, and yet how they’re formed and how to mitigate them is barely understood by major airlines.

That may be changing.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.


Inside Amazon’s free video strategy

Amazon has been doubling down on original content for Freevee, its ad-supported video service, which has seen a lot of growth thanks to a deep integration with other Amazon properties.

Freevee’s investment into original programming like 'Bosch: Legacy' has increased by 70%.

Photo: Tyler Golden/Amazon Freevee

Amazon’s streaming efforts have long been all about Prime Video. So the company caught pundits by surprise when, in early 2019, it launched a stand-alone ad-supported streaming service called IMDb Freedive, with Techcrunch calling the move “a bit odd.”

Nearly four years and two rebrandings later, Amazon’s ad-supported video efforts appear to be flourishing. Viewership of the service grew by 138% from 2020 to 2021, according to Amazon. The company declined to share any updated performance data on the service, which is now called Freevee, but a spokesperson told Protocol the performance of originals in particular “exceeded expectations,” leading Amazon to increase investments into original content by 70% year-over-year.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Latest Stories