Telehealth won't solve abortion access in a post-Roe world

Abortion pills offer a sliver of hope in a post-Roe world. But online providers face a lot of the same limits that exist in the offline world.

A person looking at a phone with information on Mifepristone.

“Telehealth is not a panacea,” said Cindy Adam, CEO of the telehealth clinic Choix.

Photo: Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images

Almost as soon as Politico broke the news Monday that the Supreme Court is poised to overturn Roe v. Wade, searches for “abortion pills” shot up on Google. Reproductive rights advocates quickly held up medication abortion as the tiniest splinter of hope that pregnant people will not have to return to the back alleys of old to have abortions in a post-Roe world.

And in a lot of ways, that’s true. The telehealth boom of the last two years and more recent regulatory changes at the FDA have launched a batch of startups that provide safe, effective abortion pills by mail.

But the people behind these companies are equally cautious about overselling their promise, as they grapple with what the court’s decision means for their own nascent industry.

“Telehealth is not a panacea,” said Cindy Adam, CEO of the telehealth clinic Choix, which launched in 2020. “If you can’t provide a surgical abortion or an in-clinic abortion in that state, you also cannot do a telehealth abortion.” If Roe is struck down, that will include a lot more states.

Far from a salvation, telemedicine abortion providers view themselves instead as a stopgap for what is bound to be a surge of demand for abortions in states where it’s still legal. Without telemedicine, they say, that demand could easily exceed capacity at brick-and-mortar clinics.

Kiki Freedman, CEO of the telehealth provider Hey Jane, which operates in six states, has already seen an increase in patients reporting longer-than-expected wait times at in-person clinics. “[This] suggests to us that bans in places like Texas are already having a ripple effect,” Freedman said. “Losing Roe would only magnify that.”

Freedman and Adam hope their services will free physical clinics up to serve patients who either aren’t eligible for or open to a medication abortion.

But for people in states where abortion is banned, accessing these online services legally will require overcoming the same obstacles that exist in the offline world, including traveling to a neighboring state where abortion is legal and paying out of pocket for a procedure that can cost more than $200. “If patients can travel to the states we’re in and remain there for their visit and the time it takes the pills to get here overnight, we can provide that service,” said Leah Coplon, director of Clinical Operations at Abortion On Demand, which operates in 21 states. “Obviously not everyone has the luxury.”

Questions also remain about how much liability out-of-state providers will face if they treat patients who travel from states where abortion is banned, and whether telemedicine providers will be able to seek referrals from brick-and-mortar clinics in those states. In a state like Texas that has outlawed aiding and abetting an abortion, even something like providing information about where to get abortion pills can be legally risky for providers. If states with trigger laws on the books mimic Texas’ approach, Adam said that could further hamper Choix’s ability to serve those patients, even when they’re traveling out of state. “It would be a state-to-state question,” she said. “It will not be an easy answer.”

Lawmakers are now trying to turn their states into safe harbors for abortions, introducing legislation that would shield providers from being held liable for performing abortions on people from out of state. Connecticut recently passed one such bill and California, where Hey Jane and Choix are based, recently had a similar bill introduced in the state assembly. But even these bills wouldn’t free telemedicine providers in those states to mail pills far and wide. They would also only protect telemedicine providers when they perform abortions within Connecticut and California.

“Doctors who see patients in California and those who receive care in California should not have to fear that they will be sued as a result of abortion care enshrined in our constitution,” said California assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, who chairs the Assembly Select Committee on Reproductive Health. “This bill shores up the legal pillars for abortion rights in California so no one within the state is threatened by outside legal attacks.”

Coplon hopes that lawmakers in other states who are supportive of abortion rights will push similar legislation forward in their states.

Despite the legal challenges of offering these telemedicine services in the U.S., there are ways to get abortion pills by mail from overseas providers, most notably Aid Access, throughout the U.S. But going that route requires patients to take on additional legal risk that domestic providers are working hard to avoid. “Our goal is to ensure our patients aren’t criminalized for this activity and also to protect our providers,” Adam said.

Perhaps the biggest obstacle facing telemedicine abortion providers in the U.S. will be merely spreading the word that these services are still available, after the Supreme Court issues its decision. Laws like the one passed in Texas have already made people wary of even seeking information about abortion care, let alone getting one, Adam said. The Supreme Court decision stands to do even more damage. “People are going to think abortion is illegal in this country,” Adam said. “The fear will be a lot greater.”


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories