Protocol | Policy

The Texas abortion ban could force tech to snitch on users

From Facebook fundraisers to Google ads, tech companies could be asked to give up user data in legal cases brought on by the Texas law.

Protestors stand at a reproductive rights rally

People gather for a reproductive rights rally in Brooklyn.

Photo: Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

With the Supreme Court deciding not to block Texas' effective ban on abortion this week, fears have been rightly focused on the people in Texas who will be almost entirely barred from receiving an abortion in the state and the providers who will face grave legal consequences for continuing to provide services there.

But the law's construction creates a far broader surface area of risk than even that, enabling anyone to be sued for — knowingly or unknowingly — aiding and abetting the "performance or inducement" of an abortion. As some have pointed out, that tie could be as indirect as an Uber driver giving a woman a ride to a clinic.

Uber is not alone among tech companies in having to figure out a response to this bill. Because now, the tech sector's many social media platforms, messaging platforms, fundraising platforms and more will also have to decide what they will do if, in the process of one of these lawsuits, they receive a legal request for user data.

How will Facebook respond to a subpoena requesting the IP address of an abortion rights group administrator who's been fundraising on the platform? What will Google do if they receive a demand for information on the name and email address of an advertiser targeting Texas women with information on how to obtain an abortion?

Tech platforms such as Facebook or Google have legal protection under Section 230 for content they host. But that doesn't mean they won't face excruciating decisions about whether to comply with subpoenas for user data — the sort of orders they comply with in lots of other legal cases today.

"This law could lead to an explosion of court requests for user data from tech companies that hold troves of it," said Evan Greer, director of the digital rights group Fight for the Future. "I could see it being abused by anti-abortion groups who could potentially use the discovery process in a civil lawsuit to demand sensitive information about people and organizations providing reproductive justice services and information."

There are broader questions of corporate responsibility for tech companies to answer, too. When Indiana passed a law allowing businesses to deny service to same-sex couples, Marc Benioff canceled all of Salesforce's business in the state. When North Carolina passed its infamous "bathroom bill," PayPal canceled plans to hire 400 people at a new facility in Charlotte. Will the industry's calculus be the same now that rights of women are being curbed not in Indiana or North Carolina, but in the country's second-largest state, home to what some have hailed as the next Silicon Valley?

So far, Elon Musk, who made a big show of moving Tesla to Texas this year, summed up his thoughts in a tweet: "In general, I believe government should rarely impose its will upon the people, and, when doing so, should aspire to maximize their cumulative happiness. That said, I would prefer to stay out of politics."

And what about Uber and Lyft? Would they pay for drivers' legal fees if they're sued for giving women a ride? For now at least, tech companies aren't answering any of these questions.

Protocol reached out to tech platforms (Facebook, Google, Twitter and Reddit), rideshare companies (Uber and Lyft), companies with big offices in Texas (Apple, Palantir, Dell and HPE), companies that have boycotted other states (Salesforce and PayPal), telecom companies and organizations (Verizon, AT&T and USTelecom) and the tech lobbying group TechNet. None responded to direct questions about how they would answer court orders requesting user data or how they're managing the impact on their workers.

Two outliers in the industry were Shar Dubey, the CEO of Match Group, which is based in Texas, and Bumble, the dating app founded by Whitney Wolfe Herd. In a statement Thursday, Dubey said: "I immigrated to America from India over 25 years ago and I have to say, as a Texas resident, I am shocked that I now live in a state where women's reproductive laws are more regressive than most of the world, including India."

She added that she is setting up a fund for Texas-based employees and dependents who "find themselves impacted by this legislation and need to seek care outside of Texas." Doing so, of course, puts her at legal risk under the Texas law.

Bumble also said it would launch a relief fund. "Bumble is women-founded and women-led, and from day one we've stood up for the most vulnerable. We'll keep fighting against regressive laws like #SB8," the company said in a tweet.

'You can't really do this in secret and at scale'

While it may take other companies and their leaders more than a day to process the impact of such an unprecedented law, they won't be able to ignore these questions forever, particularly as they pertain to user data. Whether to respond to requests for this type of data may be a hypothetical now, but it won't be for long.

"Anyone who fundraises for abortion patients, providers or tells someone how to get to a clinic, etc., could be at risk," said Priscilla Smith, a resident fellow at Yale Law School's Program for the Study of Reproductive Justice. "Short answer is they could probably get a subpoena to get Google to turn over information about who bought Google Ads."

Tech platforms and telecom giants routinely respond to requests for data from both government bodies and civil litigants when those requests comply with the law. In the second half of 2020 alone, Facebook received government requests for data on more than 300,000 users and complied with more than 70% of those requests. Google received government requests for user information on more than 235,000 accounts last year, 76% of which it complied with. Google also receives thousands of so-called geofence warrants every quarter, which demand data on phones that were located in a certain place at a certain time. Telecom companies including Verizon and AT&T also field hundreds of thousands of criminal and civil demands every year in the U.S. alone.

Federal law limits the breadth of what, exactly, either government bodies or civil litigants can obtain through a subpoena. The law, for instance, would prevent a company like Facebook or Google from sharing the contents of communications, including private messages or emails, in response to a subpoena in a civil suit unless they had the user's consent. But they can share so-called metadata that includes other identifying details, like names, email addresses and IP addresses.

"If there's an identifiable defendant who's being sued, then the usual rules of civil discovery apply here, just as they would in any other case brought under a law that gives people a private right of action," said Riana Pfefferkorn, a research scholar at the Stanford Internet Observatory. "If the identity of the defendant who's being sued for their online speech is unknown — say, a pseudonymous social media account — then there are legal processes for plaintiffs to attempt to obtain identifying information about a user from Google, Facebook, etc."

Pfefferkorn said it's likely that these cases would get tied up in courts, given the tangled knot of free speech issues involved in suing people over something like a Facebook post. "I bet we'll see private plaintiffs sue people for sharing information on abortion access and then fight it out later in the courts as to whether that's 'aiding and abetting' or protected free speech," Pfefferkorn said.

Even so, all of this could wind up having a chilling effect on basic communications regarding abortions in Texas — which is, of course, at least part of the point. There are encrypted platforms where advocates and providers can continue to communicate with people seeking abortions without leaving a paper trail. But relegating these discussions to those platforms also limits their reach. "You can't really do this in secret and at scale," said Nikolas Guggenberger, executive director of the Information Society Project at Yale Law School.

Tech platforms on the receiving end of these subpoenas could fight back too. And it's possible they will. These same companies have always insisted that the only thing that would make them share data is a subpoena, court order, warrant or other valid legal mechanism. They tout that policy as if to say, "Your data is safe with us, except in extreme circumstances." But the Texas bill presents a different kind of extreme circumstance — one in which the law is so broad and so sweeping that yesterday's advocacy could be tomorrow's lawsuit.

Can we bring malls into the metaverse?

Soon you might buy digital sneakers to wear on your digital date in a digital world.

Combined with the hype around digital goods and cryptocurrency, companies and futurists are starting to imagine what shopping in the metaverse might look like.

Photo illustration: Mark Abramson/Bloomberg via Getty Images; The Fabricant; Protocol

Click banner image for more Shopping Week coverage

Before the internet, the mall was the spot for watching movies, hanging out, listening to music, finding love — and an embodiment of all-American consumerism. "The shopping center was Amazon, it was Facebook, it was Tinder, it was Spotify, it was Netflix," said retail futurist Doug Stephens. "It was the gathering point in the community."

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics indicates that by 2026, the shortage of engineers in the U.S. will exceed 1.2 million, while 545,000 software developers will have left the market by that time. Meanwhile, business is becoming increasingly more digital-first, and teams need the tools in place to keep distributed teams aligned and able to respond quickly to changing business needs. That means businesses need to build powerful workplace applications without relying on developers.

In fact, according to Gartner, by 2025, 70% of new applications developed by enterprises will use low-code or no-code technologies and, by 2023, there will be at least four times as many active citizen developers as professional developers at large enterprises. We're on the cusp of a big shift in how businesses operate and how organization wide innovation happens.

Keep Reading Show less
Andrew Ofstad
As Airtable’s co-founder, Andrew spearheads Airtable’s long-term product bets and represents the voice of the customer in major product decisions. After co-founding the company, he helped scale Airtable’s original product and engineering teams. He previously led the redesign of Google's flagship Maps product, and before that was a product manager for Android.

Can we bring malls into the metaverse?

Soon you might buy digital sneakers to wear on your digital date in a digital world.

Combined with the hype around digital goods and cryptocurrency, companies and futurists are starting to imagine what shopping in the metaverse might look like.

Photo illustration: Mark Abramson/Bloomberg via Getty Images; The Fabricant; Protocol

Click banner image for more Shopping Week coverage

Before the internet, the mall was the spot for watching movies, hanging out, listening to music, finding love — and an embodiment of all-American consumerism. "The shopping center was Amazon, it was Facebook, it was Tinder, it was Spotify, it was Netflix," said retail futurist Doug Stephens. "It was the gathering point in the community."

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

It’s still too hard to give crypto this holiday

Here's how the industry Scrooged itself out of a big opportunity.

If only giving bitcoin were this simple.

Photo illustration: gpointstudio/Getty Images Plus; Protocol

Click banner image for more Shopping Week coverage

Crypto took huge steps toward the mainstream this year. Bitcoin soared in value, Coinbase went public and VCs poured even more money into the industry. In case consumers didn't get the message, they'll surely notice when the Staples Center turns into Crypto.com Arena next month and FTX airs its first Super Bowl ad in February.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

It’s time to rethink Black Friday

The pandemic didn't end Black Friday, but it'll never look the same again.

We can expect Black Friday to stick around but lose relevance as retailers effectively dilute its meaning and purpose.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Click banner image for more Shopping Week coverage

"I'm selling meditation, so I shouldn't be stressed," said Charlie Rousset, the co-founder of sleep and relaxation gadget-maker Morphée. But even deep breathing can't help Rousset feel less on edge this Black Friday.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Latest Stories