The UK finally got Big Tech to boost teens’ privacy

Google, Facebook and TikTok have announced new teen-protection measures in the U.S. ahead of obligations they'll face under the U.K.'s new digital design code for kids and teens.

The TikTok logo displayed on a smartphone screen

The U.K.'s new Age Appropriate Design Code is setting standards for the U.S.

Photo: Solen Feyissa/Unsplash

Social media platforms are suddenly all increasing privacy standards for teen users. Why now, after all these years? It looks like new U.K. privacy rules got the ball rolling.

TikTok on Thursday announced a series of measures to protect teen users, including limiting direct messaging for users under 16 by default, requiring those users actively to choose who can see their first video and limiting nighttime push alerts. The company's new policies follow similar recent moves by YouTube, Instagram and parent companies Google and Facebook to protect teen users.

In many cases, the services have said their decisions arose as they mulled the coming of the U.K.'s new Age Appropriate Design Code. The new standards, which includes 15 rules on issues such as data minimization and connected devices, goes into effect Sept. 2.

The AADC applies to services in the U.K. and outlines robust protections for young children that may be able to lessen as users age into their late teens. It has also prompted some U.S. lawmakers to lament the lack of online protections for teens in this country. The 1998 Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, for instance, establishes some rules for children age 12 and under, such as a parental consent requirement for data collection. Teens, though, are more or less on their own, even as social media sites are eager to lock in young users while they're still setting the latest trends.

Kids' advocates have long expressed concerns about a range of potential harms children can encounter online. These range from the likelihood that children come across violence and adult-only products such as alcohol, to the permanent collection of data from children who can't meaningfully or legally consent. That data, in turn, often powers marketing that may try to take advantage of young users' limited experience. Privacy advocates also have a long list of concerns about ads to users of all ages that, for instance, only offer educational opportunities to people of a certain race or that engage in other forms of discrimination regarding health care, housing or finance.

"Children and teens are a uniquely vulnerable population no matter where they live, and companies have an obligation to ensure that their online services put the welfare of young users first," Democratic Sen. Ed Markey and Reps. Kathy Castor and Lori Trahan wrote in June letters to the heads of Facebook, Google, TikTok and others. The lawmakers urged the companies to bring their U.K. protections for teens over to the U.S.

Most of the companies' responses in recent weeks stopped short of saying they'd import the protections wholesale to the U.S., but the sites did say they were considering what parts to implement worldwide.

"The privacy, safety, and wellbeing of young people on our platforms are essential and the Age Appropriate Design Code is one of the inputs that informs the expansive work we do every day to protect the safety and privacy of young people using our apps globally," Facebook said in its July 27 response.

The company's letter came out the same day that Facebook said it would limit the options for targeting ads to users under 18 on all its properties and that it would make private accounts the default for Instagram users under 16.

Although Google didn't tease details in its response to lawmakers, the company in August announced its own suite of changes. Those included defaulting to private upload on YouTube for those under 17, turning off autoplay on YouTube Kids and blocking "ad targeting based on the age, gender, or interests" of users under 18.

TikTok, which has been under pressure from lawmakers over its handling of data because it is so popular with teens, not only made recent changes but also highlighted prior actions. It said in January, for instance, that it would make accounts for users under 16 private by default.

Even Apple, which did not receive a letter from lawmakers about the U.K. code, recently announced child protection measures. Those changes focused on preventing sexual exploitation rather than data collection and content, but some policy experts still saw Apple's moves, which also relaunched debates about encryption, as a response to worldwide efforts to rein in controversial content and protect children.

Markey, who helped author the current U.S. rules for those under age 13, called the social media companies' recent changes "steps in the right direction to increase privacy protections for children and teens online," but said in a statement he wanted more.

"These voluntary policy changes are no substitute for legally enforceable rules that force websites and apps to stop putting corporate profits ahead of children's privacy," Markey said. To create those legally enforceable rules, Markey urged Congress to move forward his bipartisan bill that would create rules for companies' treatment of some teens online, as well as a ban on targeted advertising to children. A House proposal from Castor, meanwhile, would bring several proposed protections, including a ban on targeted ads, up to age 17.

Pressures on the companies to boost teen protections aren't just coming from London and Capitol Hill. Back in 2019 in the U.S., the Federal Trade Commission settled with YouTube and TikTok for alleged violations of the kids' privacy law. And the tech community largely views the current FTC as the most aggressive since the 1970s.

Since the European Union adopted the 2018 General Data Protection Regulation, some countries in the bloc also require parental consent for user data collection up to age 16, although individual nations can lower the threshold as long as they don't go below 13. The U.K. designed the AADC rules to elaborate on GDPR.

Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, is a longtime advocate for children's online privacy. These and other factors, he said, are "forcing the industry to pay attention to the teens."

He added that the companies are trying to stave off more aggressive actions, whether by lawmakers or agencies, in an area that has long been bipartisan.

"This is a deliberate ploy to head off stronger regulation," he observed.


He couldn’t go to the cabin, so he brought the cabin to his cubicle

"Building forts” has long been a passion of Lucas Mundt's. Now, his employer plans to give out $200 stipends for cubicle decor.

Lucas Mundt scoured Craigslist and Facebook Marketplace to complete his masterpiece.

Photo: Mike Beckham

It took a little work to get viral cubicle-decorator Lucas Mundt on the phone. On Monday, he was taking a half-day to help a friend fix his laminate floor. Tuesday, I caught him in the middle of an officewide Pop-A-Shot basketball tournament. His employer, the Oklahoma water bottle-maker Simple Modern, was getting rid of the arcade-style hoops game, and “glorious prizes and accolades” were on the line, Mundt said. (CEO Mike Beckham was eliminated in the first round, I heard from a source.)

Why did I want to talk with Mundt? His cubicle astonished nearly 300,000 Twitter users this week after Beckham tweeted out photos of it converted into what can only be described as a lakeside cabin motif. Using leftover laminate flooring that he found on Facebook Marketplace, Mundt created the appearance of a hardwood floor, and he carefully applied contact paper to give his cubicle walls, desk and file cabinet the look of a cozy cabin. The space heater that looks like a wood stove? Purely decorative: Mundt runs hot. The two fake mounted animal heads? They’re “kind of ironic,” said Mundt, who’s never gone hunting.

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.

COVID-19 accelerated what many CEOs and CTOs have struggled to do for the past decade: It forced organizations to be agile and adjust quickly to change. For all the talk about digital transformation over the past decade, when push came to shove, many organizations realized they had made far less progress than they thought.

Now with the genie of rapid change out of the bottle, we will never go back to accepting slow and steady progress from our organizations. To survive and thrive in times of disruption, you need to build a resilient, adaptable business with systems and processes that will keep you nimble for years to come. An essential part of business agility is responding to change by quickly developing new applications and adapting old ones. IT faces an unprecedented demand for new applications. According to IDC, by 2023, more than 500 million digital applications and services will be developed and deployed — the same number of apps that were developed in the last 40 years.[1]

Keep Reading Show less
Denise Broady, CMO, Appian
Denise oversees the Marketing and Communications organization where she is responsible for accelerating the marketing strategy and brand recognition across the globe. Denise has over 24+ years of experience as a change agent scaling businesses from startups, turnarounds and complex software companies. Prior to Appian, Denise worked at SAP, WorkForce Software, TopTier and Clarkston Group. She is also a two-time published author of “GRC for Dummies” and “Driven to Perform.” Denise holds a double degree in marketing and production and operations from Virginia Tech.

Ripple’s CEO won’t apologize for taking on the SEC

“The SEC declared war on Ripple. We’re defending ourselves.”

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse isn’t apologizing for his company’s pugnacious stance with regulators.

Photo: Ripple

Ripple just bought back a huge chunk of its shares this week, which CEO Brad Garlinghouse touted as a sign of the crypto company’s momentum.

But he also used the opportunity to hit back at the agency that the crypto powerhouse considers its nemesis: the SEC.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

The Twitter account Elon Musk would pay to delete

‘I’ve put a lot of work into it, and $5k is just really not enough.’

Elon Musk considers the Twitter account a security risk.

Photoillustration: Brendan Smialowski/AFP and Getty Images Plus; Protocol

“Can you take this down? It is a security risk.”

That’s how Elon Musk opened a conversation with 19-year-old Jack Sweeney over Twitter DM last fall. He was referencing a Twitter account, called @ElonJet, which tracks the movements of his private jet around the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol, covering breaking news. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.


Intel must spend $100B in Ohio now to avoid spending more later

Forget the politics. Here’s why Intel’s new factories in Ohio are crucial to the company’s future and its hope of regaining the chip manufacturing leadership spot.

Intel is doubling down on its own contract manufacturing business for fabless chipmakers.

Photo: Walden Kirsch/Intel Corporation

Intel’s plans to invest up to $100 billion in a new group of chip factories outside Columbus, Ohio, will have a much greater impact on the future of its manufacturing division compared to any short-term political or supply-chain concerns it might solve.

To hear President Joe Biden, U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and Ohio Governor Mike DeWine tell it, the new factories — known as fabs in this world — are going to help fix inflation, make the U.S. more competitive, drive down the soaring cost of cars, ease the chip supply-chain shocks and improve U.S. national security. That’s a lot, even for one of the biggest projects in Intel’s storied history. It will be years before that capacity comes online, and whether a new chip factory in Ohio could actually solve any or all of those issues is debatable.

Keep Reading Show less
Max A. Cherney

Max A. Cherney is a Technology Reporter at Protocol covering the semiconductor industry. He has worked for Barron's magazine as a Technology Reporter, and its sister site MarketWatch. He is based in San Francisco.

Latest Stories