Policy

‘This could be dangerous’: Why Tim Wu’s appointment has Big Tech rattled

A leader in the trust-busting movement will advise Biden's 'whole government' approach to the tech industry.

‘This could be dangerous’: Why Tim Wu’s appointment has Big Tech rattled

Tim Wu, a fierce antitrust advocate, will serve as a top adviser to President Biden.

For Big Tech and its supporters, President Biden's decision to put Tim Wu on the National Economic Council is the most ominous sign yet that Wu's signature warning is correct: "The antitrust winter is over."

Wu is a leader in the progressive movement to break up Big Tech. As special assistant to the president for technology and competition policy, a newly-created position under Biden, he will work across the federal government to identify policies that could loosen the grip the major tech companies hold on the economy and encourage competition in the tech industry, according to sources familiar with the position.

The move is rattling representatives of the tech industry and its allies, who say Wu's work is full of big ideas that ignore the realities of enforcement and the potential harms of breaking up the biggest companies in the country. "There's certainly a laser focus by Mr. Wu on technology platforms — it seems to permeate almost everything he does," said Carl Szabo, vice president and general counsel at tech trade group NetChoice. "Essentially, you've got somebody who is so convinced that something is bad that they will seek to prove their hypothesis rather than engage in true analytics."

Berin Szoka, the president of tech-funded think tank TechFreedom and Wu's former law student at Columbia University, said it's not "surprising that the Biden administration would consider an appointment like this an opportunity to make [progressives] feel included, and that their concerns were being taken seriously at the highest level." But he said it's too soon to tell how influential his position could be, considering positions at the NEC are often nebulous and deeply shaped by the personalities within the White House.

But a Biden administration official told Protocol that Wu's role at the NEC will be significant. "There are very few high-level positions in the NEC — people aren't just giving them away to stick somebody in the basement," said the official, who was not authorized to speak on the record about the position. "You get that position because you're going to play a meaningful role in policy discussions. It doesn't mean you run everything, but it certainly means he'll be a voice at the table."

The official said Wu's appointment reflects the administration's view that competition in the tech space "involves much more than antitrust enforcement."

"He will be a voice for identifying how there are multiple players in the federal government who can work with antitrust enforcers to promote competition in the tech sector," the official said, adding that Wu's work could involve helping to shape rules for the future of AI or privacy across various agencies.

Wu, a professor at Columbia University and author of a series of books on monopoly power, has been pushing to create a position at the NEC focused on cultivating a "whole government" approach to competition policy. And now he has the opportunity to make that dream a reality in what will likely be the most important chapter in his career, picking up where he left off at the end of the Obama administration when he helped shape former President Obama's 2016 executive order on competition.

"With the choice of Tim Wu as special assistant to the president for technology and competition, it is clear this administration is serious about promoting competition in the United States," Sen. Amy Klobuchar, the head of the Senate Judiciary antitrust subcommittee, said in a statement. "He has been a leading thinker on technology and competition policy issues, from his work on net neutrality to his recent scholarship on the monopoly power crisis. I look forward to working with Mr. Wu to modernize antitrust enforcement, strengthen our economy, and protect workers and consumers."

Roger McNamee, an early Facebook investor and venture capitalist turned tech reformer, said Wu has "mastered the interface between tech reform and the government agencies responsible for doing something about it." The two met in New York in 2017, when McNamee and former Google design ethicist Tristan Harris were holding meetings with policymakers and antitrust advocates to discuss the growing tech-lash. At that point, the movement to reform the tech industry through policy was in its "embryonic" stages — and Wu, a quirky academic with a subdued demeanor and a deep loathing for corporate exploitation, was at the center of it.

"I'd say there's no academic who's had a bigger impact than Tim has," said Bill Kovacic, the former Republican chairman of the FTC, who worked with Wu when he was an adviser at the commission between 2011 and 2013. "Whether it's net neutrality, whether it's more recent work on the direction of competition law and policy — on several occasions, he's changed the debate."

It's true that Wu has left his fingerprints on almost every major government decision affecting Silicon Valley since the early 2000s. After coining the term "net neutrality" in a seminal 2002 paper, Wu helped the FCC to craft its net neutrality rules. Earlier in his career, he helped companies including Google think through their approach to major policy issues, said Alan Davidson, who was the head of Google's policy shop between 2005 and 2011.

"Tim was one of the OG early deep thinkers on hard internet policy problems," Davidson said. "He certainly influenced the Google policy shop's views on issues like net neutrality and competition." At the time when Wu came in to talk to Google's policy team, Davidson said, Google mainly thought of itself as a smaller player compared to companies like Microsoft and the telecom companies — a "simpler time," as Davidson put it. And then, only a few years later, Wu was a key member of the team at the FTC that decided to pass on suing Google in 2013 (a decision he vigorously defended before doing an about-face a few years later.)

Wu would go on to become one of Google's major critics, calling for the government to use its full powers to break up monopolies "in the age of Google." And he held meetings in 2019 with the FTC, DOJ and state attorneys general laying out the case for breaking up Facebook, about a year and a half before the FTC and a coalition of 48 states sued Facebook for anticompetitive conduct. Scott Hemphill, an antitrust professor at New York University who gave the presentation to regulators alongside Wu and Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes, said there's a "snug fit" between their ideas for the antitrust case against Facebook and the case that the FTC eventually brought.

And Wu has been closely connected to Rep. David Cicilline, the chairman of the House Judiciary antitrust subcommittee. Cicilline gave opening remarks at a talk about Wu's book "The Curse of Bigness" in 2019, calling it a "powerful and important contribution to our understanding of today's monopoly moment and how we got here." Wu was a consistent adviser to the House Judiciary antitrust staffers who conducted the months-long investigation into Facebook, Google, Apple and Amazon. Their final report, which concluded the tech giants were operating like monopolies, mentioned Wu more than 20 times.

Sources close to Wu described him as unusually flamboyant for an academic, known for cultivating unique hobbies like winter surfing in New York City and opining to his 50,000 Twitter followers under the handle "@superwuster." (He said on Friday that he's "putting this Twitter feed on hold for now.") And he's been known to put his foot in his mouth, ruffling feathers in his quest to condemn the government's approach to Silicon Valley over the last several decades.

Before Wu joined the FTC, he told the Chronicle of Higher Education that the FTC had been "quieted during the Bush years almost to the point of nonexistence," aggravating his soon-to-be-colleague Kovacic, who was the chairman of the FTC under Bush. Wu apologized to Kovacic and the two made up — but Kovacic pointed out that Wu was part of the team that decided not to sue Google.

"When you read the Chronicle of Higher Education story, the whole tone of the story is, 'This place is a disaster. I'm here to save it,'" Kovacic said. "So I'd take a look and ask, 'Dr. Wu, how did that saving effort go?'"

Throughout his stints in the government — the New York attorney general's office, the FTC and Obama's NEC — Wu has mainly served as a big thinker seeking to expand how his colleagues approached competition issues. And now his task will be turning all that energy into substantive policy change during the Biden administration.

Szabo said Silicon Valley shouldn't underestimate the importance of Wu's appointment.

"It should not be hand-waved away," he said. "This could be dangerous."

Workplace

The tools that make you pay for not getting stuff done

Some tools let you put your money on the line for productivity. Should you bite?

Commitment contracts are popular in a niche corner of the internet, and the tools have built up loyal followings of people who find the extra motivation effective.

Photoillustration: Anna Shvets/Pexels; Protocol

Danny Reeves, CEO and co-founder of Beeminder, is used to defending his product.

“When people first hear about it, they’re kind of appalled,” Reeves said. “Making money off of people’s failure is how they view it.”

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Foursquare data story: leveraging location data for site selection

We take a closer look at points of interest and foot traffic patterns to demonstrate how location data can be leveraged to inform better site selecti­on strategies.

Imagine: You’re the leader of a real estate team at a restaurant brand looking to open a new location in Manhattan. You have two options you’re evaluating: one site in SoHo, and another site in the Flatiron neighborhood. Which do you choose?

Keep Reading Show less

Elon Musk has bots on his mind.

Photo: Christian Marquardt/Getty Images

Elon Musk says he needs proof that less than 5% of Twitter's users are bots — or the deal isn't going ahead.

Keep Reading Show less
Jamie Condliffe

Jamie Condliffe ( @jme_c) is the executive editor at Protocol, based in London. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, he worked on the business desk at The New York Times, where he edited the DealBook newsletter and wrote Bits, the weekly tech newsletter. He has previously worked at MIT Technology Review, Gizmodo, and New Scientist, and has held lectureships at the University of Oxford and Imperial College London. He also holds a doctorate in engineering from the University of Oxford.

Policy

Nobody will help Big Tech prevent online terrorism but itself

There’s no will in Congress or the C-suites of social media giants for a new approach, but smaller platforms would have room to step up — if they decided to.

Timothy Kujawski of Buffalo lights candles at a makeshift memorial as people gather at the scene of a mass shooting at Tops Friendly Market at Jefferson Avenue and Riley Street on Sunday, May 15, 2022 in Buffalo, NY. The fatal shooting of 10 people at a grocery store in a historically Black neighborhood of Buffalo by a young white gunman is being investigated as a hate crime and an act of racially motivated violent extremism, according to federal officials.

Photo: Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

The shooting in Buffalo, New York, that killed 10 people over the weekend has put the spotlight back on social media companies. Some of the attack was livestreamed, beginning on Amazon-owned Twitch, and the alleged shooter appears to have written about how his racist motivations arose from misinformation on smaller or fringe sites including 4chan.

In response, policymakers are directing their anger at tech platforms, with New York Governor Kathy Hochul calling for the companies to be “more vigilant in monitoring” and for “a legal responsibility to ensure that such hate cannot populate these sites.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

We're answering all your questions about the crypto crash.

Photo: Chris Liverani/Unsplash

People started talking about another crypto winter in January, when falling prices had wiped out $1 trillion in value from November’s peak. Prices rallied back in March, restoring some of the losses. Then crypto fell hard again, with bitcoin down more than 60% from its all-time high and other cryptocurrencies harder hit. The market’s message was clear: Crypto winter was no longer coming. It’s here.

If you’ve got questions about the crypto crash, the Protocol Fintech team has answers.

Keep Reading Show less
Latest Stories
Bulletins