Protocol | Policy

Trump is suing Google, Twitter and Facebook. The cases are 'DOA.'

The former president, who is still suspended from Facebook, Youtube and Twitter, has long tried to punish social media companies that he claims silence conservatives. It hasn't gone well.

A graphic of Donald Trump that appears ripped over his mouth, with text in French peeking through underneath.

Trump has unsuccessfully threatened social media and claimed it silences conservatives.

Image: Charles Deluvio / Protocol

Donald Trump announced Wednesday he'll sue Facebook, Twitter and Google for allegedly silencing him, even though the former president's previous attempts to punish social media have largely failed.

The lawsuits against the companies and CEOs Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey and Sundar Pichai come as Trump remains suspended from Facebook, Twitter and YouTube over his praise of supporters who perpetrated the deadly Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol.

"I stand before you this morning to announce a very important and very beautiful, I think, development for our freedom," said Trump, speaking on Wednesday alongside the leaders of the pro-Trump America First Policy Institute. Trump said he would be the lead plaintiff in a class action seeking an injunction, punitive damages and "prompt restitution" in federal court.

Get access to all the latest tech politics and policy coverage at Protocol | Policy.

Trump often asserts that companies cannot silence users for their political beliefs, and insists that the major social media sites are doing that to conservatives. But free speech rights in the U.S. only stop the government, not private companies, from shutting down people's views, and the social media sites, which have been key to the spread of Trump's movement, deny their content moderation is partisan. U.S. law also immunizes online firms from lawsuits over the third-party content they remove as a way to incentivize the takedown of violent, threatening and horrific content.

For that reason, experts say the suits are almost certainly destined for failure. "Trump's suit is DOA," said Paul Barrett, deputy director of the NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights said in a statement. "In fact, Facebook and Twitter themselves have a First Amendment free speech right to determine what speech their platforms project and amplify—and that right includes excluding speakers who incite violence, as Trump did in connection with the January 6 Capitol insurrection."

Yet Trump, who repeatedly violated the sites' user agreements, has insisted the companies must be punished for alleged misdeeds. During his presidency, he frequently pushed Republicans in Congress to repeal the websites' immunity under Sec. 230 of the Communications Decency Act, signed an order urging agencies to pare the protections, unsuccessfully vetoed the defense authorization because it didn't repeal the law and issued all manner of threats.

"We're going to hold big tech very accountable," said Trump, who routinely threatens lawsuits and gains publicity from the claims without following through on them. "This is the first of numerous other lawsuits, I assume, that would follow."

The suits aim to find a workaround to the fact that tech companies are private entities by framing them as extensions of Congress, arguing that pressure from congressional Democrats led them to make the content moderation decisions they made.

Talks in Congress regarding ripping out Sec. 230, which has detractors on both sides of the aisle, collapsed as it became clear that Republicans and Democrats wanted different things. President Joe Biden, nominally a critic of the law himself, revoked Trump's order.

"We're going to make sure that the liability protections that they have under Sec. 230 is, at a very minimum, changed and maybe at a maximum taken away," Tump claimed.

In his post-presidency, Trump also had a short-lived blog, and so far appears to have stayed off Gettr, the social media site from former top aide Jason Miller. Miller's site explicitly claimed rights to moderate content in its terms of service, in terms reminiscent of Sec. 230.

Plenty of Democrats have balked at the power of Big Tech companies, including their ability to squash speech, particularly internationally where countries use that power to shut up dissent. And it's certainly true that Trump has been booted, for now, from major platforms for his violations.

Yet the idea of suing the social media sites over alleged censorship is hardly new and is rarely successful. Plaintiffs with lower public profiles than Trump have insisted that sites like Facebook function so much like a government that they can't shut people down. Conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has also floated regulating Facebook and Twitter as utilities that are so crucial to modern communications that they shouldn't be allowed to discriminate against customers. Even Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a law to use the power of the state to force companies to keep up content they would otherwise suppress.

During a speech reminiscent of his campaign rallies that touched on Trump's many political grievances and his handling of the coronavirus pandemic, Trump claimed on Wednesday that the companies had ceased being private entities.

Yet the Florida law was blocked last week, at least temporarily, and as recently as 2019, the Supreme Court said that free speech guarantees mean private companies can exercise control over the content they carry.

Hirsh Chitkara
Hirsh Chitkara (@ChitkaraHirsh) is a researcher at Protocol, based out of New York City. Before joining Protocol, he worked for Business Insider Intelligence, where he wrote about Big Tech, telecoms, workplace privacy, smart cities, and geopolitics. He also worked on the Strategy & Analytics team at the Cleveland Indians.

The way we work has fundamentally changed. COVID-19 upended business dealings and office work processes, putting into hyperdrive a move towards digital collaboration platforms that allow teams to streamline processes and communicate from anywhere. According to the International Data Corporation, the revenue for worldwide collaboration applications increased 32.9 percent from 2019 to 2020, reaching $22.6 billion; it's expected to become a $50.7 billion industry by 2025.

"While consumers and early adopter businesses had widely embraced collaborative applications prior to the pandemic, the market saw five years' worth of new users in the first six months of 2020," said Wayne Kurtzman, research director of social and collaboration at IDC. "This has cemented collaboration, at least to some extent, for every business, large and small."

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Silver

Kate Silver is an award-winning reporter and editor with 15-plus years of journalism experience. Based in Chicago, she specializes in feature and business reporting. Kate's reporting has appeared in the Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Atlantic's CityLab, Atlas Obscura, The Telegraph and many other outlets.

Hirsh Chitkara
Hirsh Chitkara (@ChitkaraHirsh) is a researcher at Protocol, based out of New York City. Before joining Protocol, he worked for Business Insider Intelligence, where he wrote about Big Tech, telecoms, workplace privacy, smart cities, and geopolitics. He also worked on the Strategy & Analytics team at the Cleveland Indians.

Why Coda thinks documents are the internet's next big platform

Shishir Mehrotra on the long-overdue reinvention of documents, presentations and spreadsheets.

Not much has changed about documents since the days of Microsoft Word 1.0. But innovation is picking up again.

Image: Microsoft

The way Shishir Mehrotra sees it, digital documents haven't really changed in 50 years. Since the days of WordStar, Harvard Graphics and VisiCalc, the basic idea of what makes up a document, presentation and spreadsheet haven't really changed.

Now, thanks to companies like Coda — where Mehrotra is founder and CEO — along with Notion, Quip and others, that's starting to change. These companies are building tools that can do multiple things in a single space, that are designed both for creating and for sharing, and that turn documents from "a piece of paper on a screen" into something much more powerful. And to hear Mehrotra tell it, documents are headed toward a future that looks more like an operating system than a Word file.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Protocol | Enterprise

Why Segment is central to Twilio’s path to enterprise software stardom

Given Apple's recent changes to third-party tracking technology and Google's looming changes, the customer data platform provider is poised to play a central role in Twilio's product vision moving forward.

The launch of Engage points to the critical role Segment will play in Twilio's future.

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

This week at Twilio's annual conference, it's Segment, the company it acquired last year for $3.2 billion, that's poised to take center stage.

Signal kicks off on Wednesday. Alongside Michelle Obama, one of the highlights of the two-day event is bound to be Twilio Engage, a new product that showcases the combined capabilities of the cloud communications provider and Segment, the customer data platform vendor that Twilio bought last November.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a senior reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software, including industry giants like Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle. He previously covered emerging technology for Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Latest Stories