Ukraine’s meme war is a 'desperate' cry for help

Ukraine’s cartoon about Russia went viral on Twitter. But the country has waged a shitposting war for years.

Ukraine’s meme war is a 'desperate' cry for help

Ukraine’s Twitter account has teetered between serious and sarcastic posts about Russia for ages.

Photo: Laurent Van der Stockt for Le Monde/Getty Images

Early Thursday morning, just hours after Russia began its invasion into Ukraine, Ukraine’s official Twitter account posted a political cartoon of an oversized Adolf Hitler looking over Vladimir Putin, his hand cupping Putin’s cheek. Ukraine responded to the tweet a couple hours later: “This is not a ‘meme,’ but our and your reality right now.”

Later in the day, Ukraine tweeted again: “Tag @Russia and tell them what you think about them.”

The country’s tweets went viral, with people seemingly dumbfounded that Ukraine would use such a sarcastic tone on social media while it was being attacked. But Ukraine’s Twitter account has teetered between serious and sarcastic posts about Russia for ages — since as far back as 2017, at least. Only, now, the country’s posts are getting attention.

Ukraine’s use of humor to communicate about serious issues isn’t as odd as it seems, according to Fred Cook, director of USC Center for Public Relations at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. “It reflects the fact that Ukraine has very limited power and very few ways to defend themselves,” Cook told Protocol. “They are using the common language of the internet to tell their story to the west, where people aren't very knowledgeable about the situation in Ukraine.”

English-speaking users have always seemed to be the country’s target audience. Ukraine has posted memes and sarcastic tweets tagging @Russia about 40 times since 2020, according to tweets on the account that were reviewed by Protocol. All of the text in the tweets, as well as the text in Ukraine’s memes, was written in English.

No matter the issue, Ukraine would tweet through it. In March 2021, Ukraine’s account quote-retweeted a news story saying Russia planned to block Twitter for failing to delete banned content. The tweet read, “bye, @Russia.” In December, Ukraine posted an image describing different types of headaches: a migraine, hypertension, stress and “living next to Russia.” Last month, the country posted a photo of a Simpsons character with the text: “Stop saying ‘Ukraine crisis.’ There is no crisis. There is a bad neighbor."

Cook added that memes can’t effectively combat what’s happening on the ground, but humor can grab people’s attention and communicate Ukraine’s need for help from the rest of the world. “They're desperate at this point,” Cook said. “They’re being beaten up by a bully. And when you're being beaten up by bullies, you grab a rock or stick or anything to try to defend yourself.

Russia’s Twitter account, notably, doesn't acknowledge Ukraine. In general, Russia’s account posts photos of different destinations in the country and historical facts about it. On Saturday morning, for example, the account retweeted a post from a Russian travel page about the “most beautiful railway stations in Russia.” But Ukraine is quick to respond to Russia’s tweets: For example, when Russia tweets about Crimea, a region it invaded and annexed from Ukraine in 2014, Ukraine often quote-retweets the posts with jokes.

Memes have changed political discourse in other countries, too, including in the United States. A meme likening Sen. Ted Cruz to the Zodiac Killer during the 2016 presidential election, for example, prompted more political engagement, while memes in India have been used to demonstrate where people stand on party lines and issues, according to a 2017 report on internet memes and political discourse.

Ramesh Srinivasan, an information studies professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, said the tweets may not be a sign of weakness, but a soft power tool the country can use to assert its sovereignty over Russia. “It's important that we look at social media as sort of a propagandist media wing of any sort of political entity,” Srinivasan told Protocol.

“[Ukraine is] pushing the aggressor back to where now what we see is absolute desperation,” he added. “And that's why we see a different sort of set of tweets occurring now.”

Ukraine’s Twitter account hasn’t been humorous as of late. On Friday, the account posted a Twitter thread detailing ways users can help Ukraine. On Saturday morning, the account posted a video depicting Russia’s attack on Ukraine and calling on fellow countries to help it defend itself. “Hit Russia with severe sanctions. Ban it from SWIFT. Isolate it fully. Stop Putin. Stop Russian aggression. Save Ukraine,” text on the video read.

Srinivasan added that Ukraine is portrayed by the western world in a generally positive light, and tapping into the humor understood by the West and more specifically young people helps the country remain in a favorable light. “I don't think these tweets are necessarily presenting Ukraine so differently than what most of the western world at least sees as a country that's being unfairly invaded,” he said.


This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).


White House AI Bill of Rights lacks specific guidance for AI rules

The document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is long on tech guidance, but short on restrictions for AI.

While the document provides extensive suggestions for how to incorporate AI rights in technical design, it does not include any recommendations for restrictions on the use of controversial forms of AI.

Photo: Ana Lanza/Unsplash

It was a year in the making, but people eagerly anticipating the White House Bill of Rights for AI will have to continue waiting for concrete recommendations for future AI policy or restrictions.

Instead, the document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is legally non-binding and intended to be used as a handbook and a “guide for society” that could someday inform government AI legislation or regulations.

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights features a list of five guidelines for protecting people in relation to AI use:

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories