Developer says Facebook banned him over his 'Unfollow Everything' tool

The browser extension, which was also being used for research, helped Facebook users clear their News Feeds by unfollowing, well, everything.

A sign displaying a Facebook "like" symbol across a street

Facebook banned another developer over an extension meant to fight Facebook addiction.

Photo: AFP/Getty Images

A developer named Louis Barclay said Facebook permanently banned his account in response to a browser extension he created. The extension, called simply Unfollow Everything, made Facebook less addictive by helping users automatically unfollow everything in their News Feeds, Barclay said, and was also being used by Swiss researchers to study the connection between Facebook use and happiness.

Facebook's legal team at Perkins Coie sent a cease-and-desist letter in July that accused Barclay of facilitating "unauthorized functionality on Facebook" including "mass following and unfollowing." The letter also cited Facebook's terms of use, which prohibit using Facebook's trademarks, accessing user content by "automated means," interfering with "the intended operation of Facebook" and "facilitating or encouraging others to violate terms."

At the time, Barclay said, the extension had about 13,000 downloads and about 2,500 weekly active users. Barclay, who runs another tech startup and built Unfollow Everything as an unpaid side project, told Protocol he noticed he was banned from Facebook hours before he received the letter or learned the reason why. "I felt like maybe something really bad was going to happen, like maybe I was going to go broke because Facebook was going to sue me or something like that," Barclay remembered.

That hasn't happened, but the incident does add to mounting evidence about how Facebook often enforces its terms of service against developers who seek to study or to improve upon the Facebook experience. Researchers at New York University were similarly barred from the platform after creating a browser extension that collected targeting information from Facebook political ads. Facebook charged the researchers with violating their terms against data scraping, which Facebook argues were put in place to protect user privacy.

Facebook didn't respond to Protocol's request for comment.

Barclay's story, which he shared for the first time Thursday in an essay on Slate, comes on the heels of whistleblower Frances Haugen's testimony before the Senate Tuesday, in which she called on Congress to require more data transparency of tech companies so researchers and lawmakers can actually study platforms like Facebook without relying on leaks. "Facebook hides behind walls that keep researchers and regulators from understanding the true dynamics of their system," Haugen said. "Facebook will tell you privacy means they can't give you data — this is not true."

Facebook has at times cited its past settlement with the FTC as evidence of why it must keep user data under lock and key. But after Facebook leaned on that rationale to justify its crackdown on the NYU team, FTC acting director Samuel Levine said that insinuation is "inaccurate."

"The FTC is committed to protecting the privacy of people, and efforts to shield targeted advertising practices from scrutiny run counter to that mission," Levine wrote. "Indeed, the FTC supports efforts to shed light on opaque business practices, especially around surveillance-based advertising."

Rep. Lori Trahan has introduced legislation that would require social media companies to give more data to academics, and Stanford professor Nate Persily has floated a similar idea.

As a non-academic, Barclay wouldn't necessarily benefit from those laws. But Ramya Krishnan, a staff attorney at Knight First Amendment Institute who is advising Barclay, said Congress should also take a closer look at how tech companies are "squashing user choice, including through heavy-handed terms of service."

For now, Barclay is short on legal options. As a U.K. citizen, he would be required to pay the other side's legal fees should he sue and lose, a risk he said he's not willing to take. "I'd like to try to get some kind of justice," he said. "I'm still not clear on how to do it."


Gavin Newsom shows crypto some California love

“A more flexible approach is needed,” Gov. Newsom said in rejecting a bill that would require crypto companies to get a state license.

Strong bipartisan support wasn’t enough to convince Newsom that requiring crypto companies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation is the smart path for California.

Photo: Jerod Harris/Getty Images for Vox Media

The Digital Financial Assets Law seemed like a legislative slam dunk in California for critics of the crypto industry.

But strong bipartisan support — it passed 71-0 in the state assembly and 31-6 in the Senate — wasn’t enough to convince Gov. Gavin Newsom that requiring crypto companies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation is the smart path for California.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Slack’s rallying cry at Dreamforce: No more meetings

It’s not all cartoon bears and therapy pigs — work conferences are a good place to talk about the future of work.

“We want people to be able to work in whatever way works for them with flexible schedules, in meetings and out of meetings,” Slack chief product officer Tamar Yehoshua told Protocol at Dreamforce 2022.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Dreamforce is primarily Salesforce’s show. But Slack wasn’t to be left out, especially as the primary connector between Salesforce and the mainstream working world.

The average knowledge worker spends more time using a communication tool like Slack than a CRM like Salesforce, positioning it as the best Salesforce product to concern itself with the future of work. In between meeting a therapy pig and meditating by the Dreamforce waterfall, Protocol sat down with several Slack execs and conference-goers to chat about the shifting future.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

LA is a growing tech hub. But not everyone may fit.

LA has a housing crisis similar to Silicon Valley’s. And single-family-zoning laws are mostly to blame.

As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers, whose high salaries put them at an advantage in both LA's renting and buying markets.

Photo: Nat Rubio-Licht/Protocol

LA’s tech scene is on the rise. The number of unicorn companies in Los Angeles is growing, and the city has become the third-largest startup ecosystem nationally behind the Bay Area and New York with more than 4,000 VC-backed startups in industries ranging from aerospace to creators. As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers. The city is quickly becoming more and more like Silicon Valley — a new startup and a dozen tech workers on every corner and companies like Google, Netflix, and Twitter setting up offices there.

But with growth comes growing pains. Los Angeles, especially the burgeoning Silicon Beach area — which includes Santa Monica, Venice, and Marina del Rey — shares something in common with its namesake Silicon Valley: a severe lack of housing.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


SFPD can now surveil a private camera network funded by Ripple chair

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved a policy that the ACLU and EFF argue will further criminalize marginalized groups.

SFPD will be able to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks in certain circumstances.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Ripple chairman and co-founder Chris Larsen has been funding a network of security cameras throughout San Francisco for a decade. Now, the city has given its police department the green light to monitor the feeds from those cameras — and any other private surveillance devices in the city — in real time, whether or not a crime has been committed.

This week, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors approved a controversial plan to allow SFPD to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks during life-threatening emergencies, large events, and in the course of criminal investigations, including investigations of misdemeanors. The decision came despite fervent opposition from groups, including the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which say the police department’s new authority will be misused against protesters and marginalized groups in a city that has been a bastion for both.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories