Pelosi’s USICA dismissal isn’t what you think

House leadership said they weren’t open to a backup plan on the United States Innovation and Competition Act, which includes $52 billion in subsidies for domestic manufacturing of semiconductors.

Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi

Nancy Pelosi wants to force Republicans to negotiate a compromise between the bipartisan Senate version and Democrats' preferred House version of USICA.

Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

If reconciliation efforts were to fail, Congressional Democrats had a straightforward path to pass the United States Innovation and Competition Act: Send the bipartisan Senate version through to the House. That option was particularly favorable to House Democrats facing tight reelection races, as it would have allowed them to point constituents to a much-needed legislative victory.

But on Wednesday, reports arrived that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer were not open to that option.

So why rule out the backup plan? It’s not that they want to kill a chips bill outright. Instead, Pelosi and Hoyer want to force Republicans to negotiate a compromise between the bipartisan Senate version and their preferred House version.

The House version passed with only one Republican vote in February. It includes key legislative priorities for the Democrats such as immigration reform and trade adjustment assistance programs.

“I think it’s an arrogant, unreasonable demand,” Hoyer said in a press briefing on Wednesday, responding to questions about the possibility of just passing the Senate version of USICA. He reiterated wanting the bill to pass by the beginning of August.

“Their way or the highway is not Democracy — Democracy is about what can we agree on,” Hoyer said. “I don’t believe that there aren’t 10 [Republican] Senators who can’t agree on some of the additions that we made in the House bill.”

Meanwhile, Republicans have assumed a hard-line stance of their own. At the end of June, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Republicans would only pass a bipartisan USICA bill if Democrats give up on their other top legislative priorities. That threat was aimed squarely at Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer’s plan to reintroduce a new version of the Build Back Better bill, which is expected to include some tax hikes, green energy subsidies and an extension of Affordable Care Act funding.

“The policies that are being floated are ruinous,” McConnell said on the Senate floor Monday. He went on to describe the policies as “the worst possible mix to thrust onto a country that’s already teetering on the brink of recession.”

“As Congress returns to DC this week, we should be finalizing my bipartisan USICA bill to invest in critical national security technologies and shore up the supply chain for semiconductors,” Republican Sen. Todd Young of Indiana tweeted on Monday. “Instead, Democrats are working on a proposal to increase taxes by $1 trillion.”

Leadership for both parties share the common goal for USICA to pass with $52 billion in subsidies for the domestic chip industry. Schumer held a classified Senate briefing on Wednesday that attempted to underscore the urgency of subsidies in the context of the geopolitical threat posed by China. That briefing included appearances from Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks and Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines.

The semiconductor industry has promoted its own backup-backup plan of stripping the $52 billion in subsidies out of USICA and passing them on their own. Raimondo told Axios on Wednesday that she also supports a stripped-out subsidies plan given the urgency and political stalemate. That would be a tough pill for Democrats to swallow, as it would mean giving up a key point of leverage going into midterms that are expected to swing both the House and Senate to the Republicans.

“What could happen from all this is that you wind up getting nothing,” IBM’s vice president of government and regulatory affairs, Chris Padilla, told Protocol last week. The chip makers are doing what they can to ensure that doesn’t happen. Padilla told Protocol that IBM plans to hold hundreds of meetings with policymakers in the coming weeks.


How GM plans to make its ambitious EV goals reality

The automaker's chief sustainability officer is optimistic that GM is well-positioned to rapidly scale up the EV side of its business.

"I think everything that’s been put in place to support the transition will be a real positive for the industry and for the country."

Photo: Eva Marie Uzcategui/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Automakers are on the cusp of an entirely new era.

The transition to electric vehicles is quickly becoming more than just theoretical: More models are coming onto the scene every day. This week, the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law, enshrining a new structure for EV tax credits and offering a boost to domestic critical mineral mining. The transition isn’t coming a moment too soon, given that the transportation sector makes up the largest share of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

As management teams at financial institutions look for best practices to make part of their regular toolkit, they are reaching most for the ones that increase the speed and reduce the risk of large-scale change.

That forward-thinking approach can lead financial institutions to leverage AI technology, which can help give decision-makers trusted tools to solve integral challenges vital to the health of the business. One of the leading providers of AI and machine-learning software, DataRobot continues to attract clients in financial services who want to de-risk their AI investments and rapidly scale AI to almost every part of their operations, resulting in improved productivity and higher customer satisfaction.

Keep Reading Show less
David Silverberg
David Silverberg is a Toronto-based freelance journalist, editor and writing coach. He writes for The Washington Post, BBC News, Business Insider, The Toronto Star, New Scientist, Fodor's, and several alumni magazines. He also writes for brands such as 23andme, Shopify and Bold Commerce. He has served as editor of B2B News Network, Canada's only B2B news magazine, and Digital Journal, a leading pioneer in citizen journalism. Find more about him at www.davidsilverberg.ca

How Embracer Group bought ‘Lord of the Rings’ rights for a bargain

The Swedish holding company, known best for its gaming acquisitions, bought the rights to “The Lord of the Rings.” But the deal is much more complicated than it seems.

Who really owns LOTR's rights?

Photo: New Line/WireImage

A new stakeholder has entered the complex licensing web of “The Lord of the Rings,” and the landmark deal has further complicated the already messy media empire surrounding author J.R.R. Tolkien’s fantasy epic.

The buyer, the acquisition-hungry Swedish gaming conglomerate known as Embracer Group, has purchased Middle-earth Enterprises, and with it the associated film, video game, board game, merchandise, theater production and theme park rights to the core LOTR book trilogy and “The Hobbit'' from its previous owner, The Saul Zaentz Company. Formerly Tolkien Enterprises, Zaentz’s holding group has held onto the rights since purchasing them from United Artists in 1976. (Tolkien initially sold them to UA in 1969, four years before his death.)

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.


Upstart has a new plan to sell Wall Street on its loans

The AI-powered lender will hold some loans on its balance sheet as it seeks partners for long-term capital.

Despite the current struggles, Upstart views the marketplace model as the best way to write to keep its loan business growing.

Photo: Upstart

After a revenue drop its CEO called “unacceptable,” the leadership at fintech lender Upstart is making a bet on the strength of its ability to underwrite loans with AI.

The San Mateo company is planning to leave some loans on its balance sheet that investors do not want to buy, as concerns about the economy shift Wall Street away from backing riskier consumer debt. Rather than pull back on its lending in response, the company said it will hold some loans as it seeks longer-term capital partners.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.

Does your boss sound a little funny? It might be an audio deepfake

Voice deepfake attacks against enterprises, often aimed at tricking corporate employees into transferring money to the attackers, are on the rise. And at least in some cases, they’re succeeding.

Audio deepfakes are a new spin on the impersonation tactics that have long been used in social engineering and phishing attacks, but most people aren’t trained to disbelieve their ears.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

As a cyberattack investigator, Nick Giacopuzzi’s work now includes responding to growing attacks against businesses that involve deepfaked voices — and has ultimately left him convinced that in today's world, "we need to question everything."

In particular, Giacopuzzi has investigated multiple incidents where an attacker deployed fabricated audio, created with the help of AI, that purported to be an executive or a manager at a company. You can guess how it went: The fake boss asked an employee to urgently transfer funds. And in some cases, it’s worked, he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.

Latest Stories