Why the US can't stop fighting itself on tech policy

Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s concerns about the administration’s stance on European competition proposals show how hard it is getting the government together on tech policy.

An exterior view of the Commerce department building

The U.S. government can struggle to marshal the entirety of the federal bureaucracy to work toward the same goals.

Photo: Ian Hutchinson/Unsplash

Though politics seems like a series of clashes between Democrats and Republicans, Washington has plenty of friendly fire. When it comes to tech, President Joe Biden’s administration is no exception.

Take U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, who was the target of separate Wednesday letters from Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren and more than 20 liberal and antimonopoly groups. They object to Raimondo’s recent comments that European legislators who are hoping to pass tech competition and online safety laws will end up unfairly targeting major U.S. companies. Both Warren and the groups say Raimondo’s message is seriously out of step with the Biden administration’s push to address corporate concentration.

“The mere fact that the world's largest tech companies like Facebook, Google, and Amazon are headquartered in the United States does not justify protecting their profits and their market share as if that is our default national interest,” Warren, who is known for pointed letters on policy issues, wrote in her message to Raimondo.

The apparent tension between the comments from Raimondo, the policy positions of other parts of the administration and the goals of some Democratic lawmakers is a reminder that the U.S. government, even within one party that’s theoretically philosophically aligned, can struggle to marshal the entirety of the federal bureaucracy, with vast and sometimes contradictory missions, to work toward the same goals.

The Biden administration has upped the ante on unfair competition, particularly in tech, as lawmakers seek to do the same. The Justice Department is continuing a major antitrust lawsuit against Google, which the Trump administration filed, and Biden placed a major Google foe, Jonathan Kanter, at the head of the department’s antitrust division. The Federal Trade Commission has strengthened its competition complaint against Facebook, which also began under Trump, and the commission’s Democrats are in the midst of a crackdown on mergers. The FTC is also readying a major rule-making effort that could fundamentally reshape tech and other industries. And the Federal Communications Commission, Agriculture Department and Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as other agencies, all have roles in promoting competition under a July order from Biden, which went beyond tech.

In contrast, Raimondo last week urged the EU to give more ground on proposed tech competition legislation, particularly the Digital Markets Act, which would prohibit tech “gatekeepers” from prioritizing their own services, among other provisions.

“We have serious concerns that these proposals will disproportionately impact U.S.-based tech firms and their ability to adequately serve EU customers and uphold security and privacy standards,” Raimondo told the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a powerful business lobbying group with a long history of opposing competition reforms. “Now more than ever, we encourage [European] officials to continue listening to … concerns by stakeholders before finalizing their decision.”

The outside groups, which were led by the American Economic Liberties Project, slammed Raimondo’s comments in their letter, echoing her rhetoric and noting Biden’s order demanded “a whole-of-government” to competition enforcement.

“Now, more than ever, it is important that the administration speak with a unified voice on the need to contain this threat to our markets and ultimately to the balance of power in democratic societies,” said the groups, which also included the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Public Citizen and the Revolving Door Project.

Raimondo, whose job it is to promote U.S. businesses interests internationally, didn’t make her remarks in a vacuum. European lawmakers have occasionally admitted U.S. companies are the focus of the legislation, if only because of their size, and the White House itself has also warned EU nations in documents about how the DMA would affect intellectual property rights. The administration has also said it opposes any clampdown aimed deliberately at U.S. companies, and the White House’s warnings prompted Margrethe Vestager, the European Commission’s executive vice president, to publicly assert the proposals were not in fact “directed toward certain businesses or toward certain nationalities of businesses.”

It’s also not the first time the government has seemed to be at odds with itself over tech policies. During the Trump administration, U.S. trade negotiators promoted other countries’ taking on of language akin to Section 230’s liability protections for online platforms when it comes to users’ speech, even though Washington at the time was seriously considering changes to Section 230. Trump himself tried to gut the legal shield through FCC action, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi pushed unsuccessfully to remove the language from the trade deal with Mexico and Canada.

Whether the U.S. should defend its interests by promoting its most powerful companies or the system of intense competition that produced many past innovations has become a running question in tech policy, albeit often at the insistence of major tech companies and their allies. In September, for instance, former top national security officials, many with ties to tech companies, urged caution on proposed competition legislation, suggesting it could “cede U.S. tech leadership to China.”

The Biden administration also signed on to a global tax deal conditioned on the removal of digital levies that were targeting U.S. tech giants — although major companies from all sectors will likely pay more under the global framework, which aims to stop firms from diverting most of their tax burden to low-rate jurisdictions.

Despite Biden’s own doubts about Section 230, the Justice Department, which tends to defend existing U.S. law, has also moved to assert the constitutionality of the provision as part of a lawsuit that Trump brought against Twitter. And even Raimondo herself is part of a new joint EU-U.S. council working on issues including privacy protections.

For all the tensions and delicate balancing acts within the U.S., competition enforcers across borders say they’re on the same page: A day before Raimondo’s comments, the Justice Department antitrust division, the FTC and the European Commission issued a joint statement reaffirming their commitment to cooperation on antitrust matters, particularly new types of analysis that they say are needed to tackle technological developments.

“We share democratic values and a belief in the importance of well-functioning and competitive markets, cornerstones for the continued strengthening of our economic and trade relationship,” they said.


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories