Policy

'It's just a tool for spreading propaganda': How Yandex gaslights Russians

The former head of Yandex.News said the site has a deal to pick Kremlin-friendly news outlets for its homepage, but he believes it doesn’t have to be that way.

Yandex logo

Lev Gershenzon, former head of Yandex.News, describes how the headlines downplay the invasion and what he thinks his old company can do.

Photo by Kirill Kudryavtsev/AFP via Getty Images

Russian tech giant Yandex has a handshake deal with government authorities to limit what news outlets the site will pull onto its homepage, according to a departed executive. Lev Gershenzon, Yandex’s former head of News, attracted significant notice — and some scorn — when he wrote a Facebook post tagging former colleagues, telling them to take down the feature or quit.

Gershenzon is now based in Berlin, where he runs a company that helps ecommerce platforms improve customers’ search experience. He showed Protocol how the top five stories on Yandex’s homepage may surface news about financial penalties that other countries are imposing on Russia, but is, in his description, saying little about the fighting and casualties and pulling largely from the dozen or so outlets that are friendliest to the Kremlin.

Yandex didn’t respond to questions about Gershenzon’s allegations.

Gershenzon — known as Lyova to friends and former colleagues — discussed how the deal goes beyond the government’s ability to censor webpages, how the headlines downplay the invasion and what he thinks his old company can do.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Talk about why you put this out there and why you felt it was important to speak up.

The simple answer is that, when such horrible things happen, everyone thinks of what they, particularly, can do. Here in Berlin, after the huge march that took place on Sunday, a lot of people are joining groups. They're offering their flats, their rooms. They're volunteering, as my older kids [are] yesterday and today, on the main railway station, where they meet the refugees from Ukraine. So I was thinking: How can I contribute to this? Of course, I don't have any superpowers. I can’t just stop the war. But I was the head of Yandex.News for almost five years.

I realized: This is maybe the main pillar of the war. Tens of millions of Russian citizens don't know that the war is taking place. They don't know any details about the bombings, the missiles, that a lot of civilians have been killed. That lots of soldiers — they are quite young boys — they have been killed there. And the reason? The media field is censored, drastically, and Yandex.ru is, if I'm not mistaken, the most popular media portal with the largest audience in Russia.

How does Russian policy enforce measures so that Yandex doesn't put this stuff up?

I have not worked for Yandex for almost 10 years, but the main principles [of how the site works], I believe they remain the same. Even at the time that I was leading the service, there was — I didn't like it then, but I must admit — an unofficial agreement with the guys from the present administration that the top news stories have some additional filters, the stories that are being displayed on the main page. The headlines can be acquired only from a quite short list of news sources, so not just [from all] the news sources that have media licenses. According to my sources, right now this list contains just maybe 15 or 12.

It's not news aggregation. It's just a tool for spreading propaganda, and if you have a look at these headlines, you won't find the word “war.” Only, like, “special operation.” And they really, really look quite hard to avoid [using] this word in the headlines.

What were your practical suggestions to your old colleagues?

The best [idea] — and maybe the most dangerous one, I admit — was to somehow change this filter or eliminate it totally. What I was trying to express is that the responsibility is really huge. For me, as a product guy, if the end result is awful, then it's not that interesting how we came here. The main question is how we fix it.

Maybe another option was to alter this algorithm and then to lie, and to say that it was like a hacker attack, or it was a mistake. It was a bug. I realize that [deception] couldn't last long. Maybe the truth would be displayed on Yandex for half a day. It would be great. It means, like, 15 million people would see it. If it would last for an hour, it would still mean that, I don't know, 1 million, 2 million people will see something different — some facts about these war crimes and so on — and they could spread the word. They could start asking questions.

And the last option was to just break this service, say that it doesn't work. We can display it so [there’s] no news on the main page. In my point of view, it will also be much better than displaying what's displayed right now. And, if you're not capable of doing any of this, you should resign and you should get out of the company. Because otherwise, as I see it, you're still responsible for helping the real evil guys commit these awful crimes.

What would happen to Yandex if [the team] did make these alterations, claimed it was a bug and had to take it down?

Well, I don't know. I can only guess, but [what I suggested] doesn’t violate any current laws. There is no law that Novaya Gazeta [Editor’s note: which is critical of the government but, for now, is officially allowed to operate] couldn’t be taken as a headline. It's just this agreement with this filter.

Everything could happen, but, from my experience, this self-censorship is much stronger than the real censorship. This fear of something that might happen is — often, maybe not always — much bigger than the real consequences.

What do you think average Russians think when they read these top five headlines on Yandex?

What I was trying to stress is that every hour that [this] fake news [is] displayed there, they support the war. I found the number: 30 million users daily visited this main page. Most of them, they are not interested in the news. They are not interested in politics. They just come to Yandex to solve a number of different tasks in their real life: to see the traffic jams, find a map, to buy something, to order food delivery. They just see this news block, and the question they're trying to answer, maybe unconsciously, is a simple one: Is something really happening, or is everything OK? And the [headlines Yandex uses] say everything is pretty much OK! “There is some kind of special operation happening somewhere. It's OK. Yeah, we are fighting some bandits, some narcos, some Nazis.”

They just scan these headlines, and they see nothing extraordinary, no emergency. And they go on living with this fake, toxic knowledge that no war is happening. No civilians are harmed, only [Ukraine’s] military infrastructure is being targeted.

What’s been the response to your post?

There were thousands of likes, more than thousands of shares, only on Facebook. My kids told me that there were a lot of publications on Instagram. I saw this tweet with the translation of my post, also with thousands of reshares, reposts and likes.

I had one short talk with my former colleague, who is quite a high-level executive at Yandex, but not from the list of people that I addressed personally [in the Facebook post]. He told me, “Lyova, I fully agree with your position.”

And I said, “It wasn’t about my position. It was a call to action! I need you to take some action. Every day, every hour, counts.”

He said: “You know, I’m so ashamed. I fully support you, and I tried to persuade my colleagues with a reference to your opinion. I didn’t manage to achieve anything.”

And I said: “Well, keep trying. It’s not too late.”

With my [second] post [to follow up], I said that there were a lot of missile attacks in Kharkiv again, some 20 more casualties among civilians. And all these casualties have something to do with this fucking so-called news blog. I was hoping some brave guys, maybe that were already fed up with all this shit, would approach me and say, “I’m ready to resign ... And I can do something useful before that happens, and I’m not afraid. Maybe I do something and then I flee. I take a plane.” Something like that.

No. No one.

So what do you think is next?

I'm just trying to help [Yandex] to come fast to the last stage where they take action. I don't work. I don't run my company anymore, just in some short pauses, because, well, I think that [speaking out] is the one thing that I can do right now.

Entertainment

To clear the FTC, Microsoft’s Activision deal might require compromise

The FTC is in the process of reviewing the biggest-ever gaming acquisition. Here’s how it could change the Xbox business.

Will the Microsoft acquisition of Activision get through the FTC?

Image: Microsoft; Protocol

Microsoft’s planned acquisition of Activision Blizzard is the largest-ever deal in the video game market by a mile. With a sale price of $68.7 billion, the deal is nearly 450% larger than Grand Theft Auto publisher Take-Two Interactive’s acquisition of Zynga in January, the next-largest game acquisition ever recorded.

The eye-popping price underlines the scale and scope of Microsoft’s ambitions for its gaming business: If the deal is approved, Microsoft would own — alongside its current major properties, such as Halo and Minecraft — Warcraft, Overwatch and Call of Duty, to name just a few. In turn, the deal has invited a rare level of scrutiny and attention from lawmakers and policy professionals now turning their sights on an industry that’s flown under the regulatory radar for the last several decades of its existence.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.

Enterprise

Okta CEO: 'We should have done a better job' with the Lapsus$ breach

In an interview with Protocol, Okta CEO Todd McKinnon said the cybersecurity firm could’ve done a lot of things better after the Lapsus$ breach of a third-party support provider earlier this year.

From talking to hundreds of customers, “I've had a good sense of the sentiment and the frustrations,” McKinnon said.

Photo: David Paul Morris via Getty Images

Okta co-founder and CEO Todd McKinnon agrees with you: Disclosing a breach that impacts customer data should not take months.

“If that happens in January, customers can't be finding out about it in March,” McKinnon said in an interview with Protocol.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@procotol.com.

Policy

Ethereum's co-founder thinks the blockchain can fix social media

But before the blockchain can fix social media, someone has to fix the blockchain. Frank McCourt, who’s put serious money behind his vision of a decentralized social media future, thinks Gavin Wood may be the key.

Gavin Wood, co-founder of Ethereum and creator of Polkadot, is helping Frank McCourt's decentralized social media initiative.

Photo: Jason Crowley

Frank McCourt, the billionaire mogul who is donating $100 million to help build decentralized alternatives to the social media giants, has picked a partner to make the blockchain work at Facebook scale: Ethereum co-founder Gavin Wood.

McCourt’s Project Liberty will work with the Web3 Foundation’s Polkadot project, it said Tuesday. Wood launched Polkadot in 2020 after leaving Ethereum. Project Liberty has a technical proposal to allow users to retain their data on a blockchain as they move among future social media services. Wood’s involvement is to give the idea a shot at actually working at the size and speed of a popular social network.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Fintech

Gensler: Bitcoin may be a commodity

The SEC has been vague about crypto. But Gensler said bitcoin is a commodity, “maybe.” It’s the clearest glimpse of his views on digital assets yet.

“Bitcoin — maybe that’s a commodity token. That has a big market value, but that goes over there,” Gensler said, referring to another regulator, the CFTC.

Photoillustration: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Protocol

SEC Chair Gary Gensler has long argued that many cryptocurrencies are subject to regulation as securities.

But he recently clarified that this view wouldn’t apply to the best-known cryptocurrency, bitcoin.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Latest Stories
Bulletins