Politics

Political ad dollars are moving online. Is internet TV ready?

A backlash against political ads highlights challenges around targeting, frequency capping and fraud.

An Apple TV remote

Political campaigns aren't just experimenting with ads for streaming services anymore, but making them a key part of their TV ad buys.

Photo: Kelly Sikkema/Unsplash

Hulu is in bed with the Trump campaign. It's also in love with Joe Biden. That's according to numerous Hulu subscribers from all sides of the political spectrum who have taken to Twitter in recent weeks to complain about being bombarded with an onslaught of political advertising on the streaming service.

Both presidential campaigns opened up the floodgates for TV advertising in July, and an increasing number of those ads are starting to show up on ad-supported streaming services like Hulu, Peacock, Tubi and the Roku Channel. Internet TV is promising campaigns better targeting, more bang for their buck, and access to millions of viewers who have cut the cord from traditional TV. But as the cacophony of displeased Hulu subscribers on Twitter shows, the campaigns' embrace of streaming also highlights some of the challenges of the medium.

Streaming is democratizing television

Thanks to cord cutting, millions of Americans can't be reached via cable advertising anymore. Last year alone, close to 6 million U.S. households canceled their pay TV subscriptions. Early numbers suggest that 2020, and the growing economic pressure of the pandemic, will lead to even more cord cutting.

At the same time, shelter-in-place rules have led to record engagement with streaming services. And it's not just consumers who are shifting gears: Ad dollars are moving to streaming TV as well, with insiders describing an industry-wide shift in mindset. "Everyone is using connected TV advertising now," said MadHive CEO Adam Helfgott. MadHive is an ad tech startup that works with broadcasters like Tegna on their online endeavors. In 2019, many ad buyers were still primarily focused on broadcast TV, Helfgott said. In just a few months, momentum has shifted to online TV. "The appetite is really there now," he said.

That's also true for political campaigns, according to Roku SVP Scott Rosenberg. "Political advertising is definitely a growth category for us," he told Protocol. "We are seeing a ramp-up," agreed Frank Sinton, CEO of ad tech startup Beachfront. Political campaigns aren't just experimenting with ads for streaming services anymore, but making them a key part of their TV ad buys. "It's being seen as a television platform," Sinton said.

One reason campaigns love internet TV ads is a lower barrier of entry. "We are seeing spend all the way down to local races," Sinton said. It's much easier even for smaller campaigns with limited budgets to buy internet TV ad campaigns down to the ZIP code. "You couldn't do that four years ago," he said. "It's democratizing television."

Targeting is challenging, but it's still better than traditional TV

Still, targeting the right viewers can be a challenge, as those complaints of Hulu viewers on Twitter show. "Why am I getting Trump ads on Hulu?" one of the service's subscribers asked. "Shouldn't some algorithm protect me?"

One of the problems ad tech startups struggle with is the quality of third-party targeting data. "It's a bit of a Wild West," Helfgott said. Voter registration files that are outdated, stated preferences that changed over the past couple of weeks: All the same data points that result in campaigns inundating potential voters with mailers and phone calls are also being used to target internet TV audiences.

Sometimes, that data is simply wrong. Sometimes, the wrong viewers are being targeted because of changing IP addresses. "There is a lot of misinformation," Helfgott said.

But, Sinton countered: "It's still as good if not better than on traditional TV."

A bunch of Rokus used for ad fraud

Earlier this year, ad tech startup Pixalate identified an alleged ad fraud scam involving more than a dozen obscure Roku apps. The apps, which offered little more than screensaver functionality, played ads for major brands like Geico, Lexus and Uber Eats, as well as ads for local political campaigns and ballot measures. In its analysis, the company concluded that the alleged ad fraud featured "characteristics consistent with device farms." In other words: Somewhere, someone likely set up a bunch of Roku players to continuously play content featuring the ads in question.

Device farms like these are better known from the world of mobile ad fraud, but internet TV has its own challenges. MadHive estimated in a recent report that more than 20% of all internet TV ad views are fraudulent. In some cases, that's as simple as misleading advertisers about where their ads are shown in order to charge higher prices. "They think they're buying TV, and they're really buying mobile impressions," Helfgott said. In other cases, requests may be made by device farms or bots pretending to be streaming devices.

The same ad, over and over again

Another problem internet TV has long struggled with is the frequency in which ads are being repeated. Seeing the same ad for a detergent over and over again might be annoying, but it's very different to get bombarded with the ad for a politician you can't stand. "It's a major problem," Helfgott said. Streaming services promise ad buyers frequency capping, but that's often tied to averages, resulting in painful outliers.

Frequency capping often also doesn't account for changed viewing behaviors; even seeing an ad just once during a 20-minute episode of a show can seem like a lot when a viewer binge-watches six episodes in a row.

The backlash against campaign ads on Hulu has prompted one subscriber to start a petition in Hulu's community forums to ban political ads altogether, and it's gotten more than 1,100 votes at the time of this writing. "Congratulations Hulu, you've managed to do the impossible and get Republicans and Democrats to come together in total agreement on a topic," another subscriber remarked. "Get the hint before you lose all your customers." (A Hulu spokesperson declined to comment.)

Helfgott believes that it may be time for the entire industry to take the hint and start solving issues around targeting, fraud and ad frequency. "It would be great if political [advertising] could drive that," he said.

In Hulu's case, there's always another option for viewers: The service does offer an ad-free premium tier. At least for some subscribers, election season may ultimately turn out to be a kind of upsell. "Considering upgrading my Hulu subscription precisely so I don't have to watch anymore f***ing Trump ads," one subscriber wrote on Twitter this week.

Policy

How I decided to go all-in on a federal contract — before assignment

Amanda Renteria knew Code for America could help facilitate access to expanded child tax credits. She also knew there was no guarantee her proof of concept would convince others — but tried anyway.

Code for America CEO Amanda Renteria explained how it's helped people claim the Child Tax Credit.

Photo: Code for America

Click banner image for more How I decided series

After the American Rescue Plan Act passed in March 2021, the U.S. government expanded child tax credits to provide relief for American families during the pandemic. The legislation allowed some families to nearly double their tax benefits per child, which was especially critical for low-income families, who disproportionately bore the financial brunt of the pandemic.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Climate

This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Workplace

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

Climate

The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Latest Stories
Bulletins