Power Index

What the Protocol Power Index measures

With 30 indicators spanning five categories, the Index is designed to quantify holistic power.

What the Protocol Power Index measures

Protocol Power Index

Image: Protocol

The Protocol Power Index is designed to view power through a holistic lens that reflects how modern tech companies amass and exercise their strength. To do so, the Power Index takes into account 30 metrics across five categories — Economics, Leadership, Innovation, People and Politics & Policy — and synthesizes them into a single Power Score.

Economics - 39%

A company's financial performance — measured here via six metrics sourced from PitchBook, Crunchbase, SEC filings and Macrotrends.net — makes up the largest share of the Power Score.

Since money still talks, valuation and valuation growth are two of the biggest pieces in the economics category and are measured by market capitalization or post-money valuations from funding rounds, depending on whether the company is public or private. The category also examines the amount of capital raised (excluding debt financing and PIPE rounds) and a company's largest round, as well as whether it's publicly traded and profitable.

Innovation - 25%

While strong financials can help a company weather downturns, innovation is how it can maintain a lead or close a gap in a sector.

To measure innovation in this context, the Power Index looks at both input and output, drawing on data from USPTO, the GSA, SEC filings, Crunchbase and Similarweb. An assessment of a company's research and development funding is balanced with its intellectual property activity and metrics that speak to the how the industry operates. For some Power Indexes, those metrics reflect a company's relationship with government entities or public cloud vendors or resonance with the public while others reflect usage volume (AUM or GPV). The category also takes into account M&A movement for those companies that prefer to buy instead of build.

People - 16%

It's hard to wield power without the right people, so the Power Index uses data from LinkedIn and the AFL-CIO to rank how effectively a company recruits, hires and retains employees. We look at headcount growth and job postings as well as a company's effectiveness at luring talent away from Big Tech. Plus, with salary and employee tenure, the Index accounts for a company's ability to maintain top talent.

Leadership - 12%

Successful leaders manage more than just money. The leadership category uses data from company filings, earnings calls and the Human Rights Campaign to examine the more human aspects of leadership.

With the understanding that transparency is only the first step in a company's DEI and ESG goals, a portion of this category is centered on how much the company has disclosed about its makeup and societal impact. Another portion is focused on how inclusive a workplace is for LGBTQ+ employees.

Also included in the category is a measure of how consistent a leadership team has stayed throughout the year, as well as how effectively the company has been able to mitigate cybersecurity threats in the form of data security.

Politics & Policy - 8%

The final category measures a company's influence in the political sphere, either via the corporate checkbook or how involved it is in Washington. Data from OpenSecrets, company org charts and industry bodies informs the Politics & Policy category.

This category looks first at a company's history of political donations, its involvement in political action committees and its K Street payroll, but also incorporates some of the less-explicit signals of political involvement, such as the industry organizations it belongs to as well whether it has a head of policy on staff.

* * *

Together, these categories add up to a company's Power Score. As a secondary exercise, we re-weighted the metrics to emphasize growth and create a Momentum Score for each company — a measure of who's up-and-coming, even if they're not all the way there yet.

For each category, a company's score is reflective only of the data available. Smaller, privately-held companies have relatively few public disclosure requirements, and we didn't want to penalize them or leave them out simply because they don't report as much as publicly-traded companies do. (In rare cases, we'll omit a company from our rankings because there just isn't enough data to make a call; we'll disclose when we do so.)

At the other end of the spectrum, we've intentionally omitted companies like Google, Microsoft and Amazon from the Power Index, along with companies where enough data points about the relevant business were unavailable. Their sheer size means they would dwarf everyone else in a lot of categories, especially because it's difficult to separate out relevant, segment-specific data from the overall company data. (For instance, Microsoft Azure, AWS and Google Cloud all are venturing into observability, but the level of data around usage and profitability of those products is not akin to what's available for the industry's pure plays).

Most metrics were either measured from the close of a company's most recent fiscal year or from July 2020 through June 2021. Some data, like that sourced from LinkedIn, is an estimation as it's based only on employees who are registered users. Acquisitions and leadership changes that occurred after the collection period may be reflected in the Power Sheets, but did not have an impact on a company's score. If you have questions about sourcing, please reach out to powerindex@protocol.com.


The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.


How I decided to shape Microsoft’s climate agenda

Lucas Joppa went from studying ecology to shaping one of the tech industry’s most robust climate plans. Here’s why — and why CEOs should consider hiring more people like him.

Lucas Joppa, chief environmental officer of Microsoft, told Protocol about the company's plans.

Photo: David Ryder/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Click banner image for more How I decided series

Microsoft has set a number of lofty climate and environmental goals. Forget net zero: It wants to be carbon negative by 2030. Ditto for water.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.


There’s a secret hub for fintech talent: Look south

Far from Silicon Valley and Wall Street, Atlanta has long been a hub for payments technology.

Atlanta hasn’t gotten its share of the fintech buzz, perhaps because its founders are less prone to tweetstorming.

Illustration: iStock/Getty Images Plus; Protocol

San Francisco has Square, Stripe and Plaid. But Atlanta has CoreCard, Kabbage and CheckFree. It also lays claim to pioneering charge cards, electronic payments and ATMs. Many of the everyday innovations in fintech we’ve come to rely on have the Atlanta metropolitan area to thank.

Yet Atlanta hasn’t gotten its share of the fintech buzz, perhaps because its founders are less prone to tweetstorming and its products don’t have developers rhapsodizing about APIs. Atlanta’s fintech scene has developed around a stabler, more cautious ethos: less move fast and break things, more stay safe and build things. At a time when fintech valuations have fallen sharply from their lofty peaks and regulators are circling, that may make Atlanta a more favorable place to place fintech bets, whether that means founding a company, investing or hiring local talent.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

Latest Stories