Politics

The PRO Act could help gig workers unionize. Tech companies don't like it.

The PRO Act is the latest battleground between gig worker-organizers and on-demand tech companies.

The PRO Act could help gig workers unionize. Tech companies don't like it.

The PRO Act would only consider independent contractors as employees in the context of forming a union.

Photo: Kai Pilger/Unsplash

Last year, gig workers and tech companies went to battle in California over Proposition 22, which solidified the status of gig workers in that state as independent contractors. Now, the fight has moved to the federal level thanks to the Protecting the Right to Organize Act. The bill, which is currently in the Senate, would make it far easier for gig workers and other independent contractors to unionize and bargain collectively.

The PRO Act would alter the definition of "employee" in order to broaden the number of people who are covered by the National Labor Relations Act, which protects the rights of employees and encourages participation in collective bargaining. To determine whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor, the NLRA would use the test outlined in California labor law AB 5. That test looks at whether the person is free from the employer's control, does work that is outside the scope of the company's normal business operations, and conducts similar work independently and outside the context of the employer. That test would likely result in the classification of gig workers as employees, Rey Fuentes, a Skadden Fellow at the Partnership for Working Families, told Protocol.

The legislation would also make it illegal for employers to require workers to attend meetings that are designed to discourage them from joining a union, allow unions to collect dues from workers even if they had previously opted out as a result of being employed in a "right to work" state and more.

The PRO Act is a response to the decline in union membership over the last many decades. In 1983, 20.1% of wage and salary workers were unionized in the U.S., according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Since 2016, unionized workers have represented less than 10% of the U.S. workforce.

The large drop in total employment in 2020 increased the percentage of unionized workers slightly last year, to 10.8%, according to the BLS, but the actual number of unionized workers is still down 2.2% since 2019.

Tech companies worry that the PRO Act could set a precedent that would lead to the overall reclassification of gig workers as employees. Organizations that help gig workers organize, however, see it as a way finally to get a seat at the table.

Carlos Ramos, a rideshare driver and organizer with Gig Workers Rising, sees the PRO Act as another tool in the arsenal.

"When the PRO Act passes, that doesn't mean everybody is just in a union now," Ramos told Protocol. "What it is, is giving us the opportunity to choose for yourself if this is the right way. And that's a lot more than we have right now."

The PRO Act also has the support of President Joe Biden, Rideshare Drivers United and a slew of progressive lawmakers and activists. Proponents of the bill say the PRO Act will strengthen unions and increase the power of the working class.

Companies such as Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, Postmates, Instacart and others oppose the bill. They say the PRO Act will hurt American competitiveness, give unions too much power and take away flexibility from gig workers.

The App-Based Work Alliance, a coalition formed by Uber, Postmates, DoorDash, Instacart and Lyft, called on the Senate earlier this week to reject the PRO Act. In its statement, ABWA said the PRO Act would "end flexible and independent earning opportunities" for workers as well as "force them into rigid schedules."

However, the PRO Act would only consider independent contractors as employees in the context of forming a union. The bill, if passed, would not force on-demand companies into classifying workers as employees. It would simply broaden the definition of "employees" in the NLRA.

Still, ABWA believes the bill would set a precedent for future litigation and legislation. Whitney Mitchell Brennan, a spokesperson for ABWA, told Protocol there would be "real-world consequences" from the passage of the bill on workers who prefer to be independent contractors.

"It would also set a precedent for federal agencies, as well as states and courts who are deciding cases on this issue, to follow suit and do the same," Brennan said. "That's exactly what will happen if the PRO Act passes with California's ABC test included in it, and it will lead to the same uncertainty and job losses that we saw in California with AB 5."

Jean Gauvin, a Florida-based gig worker who is against the PRO Act, similarly believes that the legislation would eventually lead to him losing his flexibility as an independent contractor.

"Things happen incrementally," Gauvin told Protocol. "They're not just going to lay down the hammer. No one ever tells you what they're really going to do all at once."

But the "slippery slope" argument "feels a little overblown," Fuentes said.

There's already litigation that is exploring whether a group of Uber Black drivers are employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act, Fuentes pointed out.

"I don't think it takes the PRO Act to see that there are movements under every element of federal law to ensure these workers are protected," Fuentes said.

The right to collectively bargain

Collective bargaining enables employees, through their union, to negotiate contracts with their employers to determine wages, benefits and other policies. As it stands today, gig workers are not eligible to do this, even though some groups have been successful in their efforts to organize large numbers of gig workers.

In 2019, the NLRB General Counsel issued a memo categorizing Uber drivers as independent contractors, not employees. That means Uber drivers don't have the same rights and protections available to employees under federal labor law. The PRO Act would essentially flip that, and say these workers should not automatically be presumed to be contractors, Fuentes said.

"That determination is really critical," said Fuentes. "The PRO Act essentially reverses that and says that none of these workers should be presumed employees but we should determine whether or not they are independent contractors or employers by using the ABC test. And that ABC test would likely result in their designation as an employee."

If designated as employees under the NLRA, gig workers would be protected from employer retaliation when discussing workplace issues with other workers. They would also be allowed to bargain collectively.

"I think that it's incredibly critical for workers to be able to access a level playing field and to be able to organize like any other worker would be able to organize," Fuentes said.

Erica Mighetto, a rideshare driver and organizer with Rideshare Drivers United, says her support of the PRO Act is about preserving civil liberties for gig workers.

"At this point, we're kind of checking our First Amendment [freedom of speech and expression, and right to assemble] at the door of our workplace," Mighetto told Protocol.

The lack of explicit legal protection hasn't stopped Mighetto and her comrades at RDU from organizing. RDU has some of the underpinnings of a union, boasting 20,000 members with a member-elected board that has already established its own bylaws.

"So if you ask me, I consider us a union," she said. "A union in progress."

The hurdles ahead

In March, the House of Representatives approved the PRO Act with a vote of 225 to 206. The bill, however, still needs to pass in the Senate before moving to President Biden's desk to be signed into law.

President Biden has previously said he supports the PRO Act and wants to see it pass. In March, the White House officially endorsed the PRO Act, saying it would clarify that employers can't force employees "waive their rights to join together in collective or class action litigation."

But the PRO Act will likely face hurdles in the Senate. Although Democrats control the Senate, they do not have enough votes to overcome a filibuster.

Still, it's a battle worth fighting because this is a critical issue for gig workers, Fuentes said.

"Unionization not only balances the power that a worker has in the workplace, but addresses core challenges that are true in the gig economy," Fuentes said. "Like pay disparity, for example, or structural racism as it relates to occupational segregation, or the benefits that workers of color receive on the job."

Hybrid work has some distinct advantages when it comes to onboarding.

Photo: LogMeIn

Jo Deal is the chief human resources officer at LogMeIn. She is responsible for leading global people strategy with a focus on attracting, developing and engaging talent.

The desire for change that sprung up during the pandemic resulted in the highest attrition levels in decades and a fierce war for talent playing out in the market. The Great Resignation forced managers to suddenly make hiring their top priority, and recruitment partners became everyone’s best friend as leaders scrambled to replace key roles within their teams.

Keep Reading Show less
Jo Deal
Jo Deal serves as LogMeIn’s Chief Human Resources Officer. She is responsible for leading global people strategy with a focus on attracting, developing and engaging world class talent by expanding LogMeIn’s reputation as one of tech’s most desirable career destinations, and by providing a collaborative learning environment where employees can grow their careers.
Sponsored Content

A CCO’s viewpoint on top enterprise priorities in 2022

The 2022 non-predictions guide to what your enterprise is working on starting this week

As Honeywell’s global chief commercial officer, I am privileged to have the vantage point of seeing the demands, challenges and dynamics that customers across the many sectors we cater to are experiencing and sharing.

This past year has brought upon all businesses and enterprises an unparalleled change and challenge. This was the case at Honeywell, for example, a company with a legacy in innovation and technology for over a century. When I joined the company just months before the pandemic hit we were already in the midst of an intense transformation under the leadership of CEO Darius Adamczyk. This transformation spanned our portfolio and business units. We were already actively working on products and solutions in advanced phases of rollouts that the world has shown a need and demand for pre-pandemic. Those included solutions in edge intelligence, remote operations, quantum computing, warehouse automation, building technologies, safety and health monitoring and of course ESG and climate tech which was based on our exceptional success over the previous decade.

Keep Reading Show less
Jeff Kimbell
Jeff Kimbell is Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Honeywell. In this role, he has broad responsibilities to drive organic growth by enhancing global sales and marketing capabilities. Jeff has nearly three decades of leadership experience. Prior to joining Honeywell in 2019, Jeff served as a Partner in the Transformation Practice at McKinsey & Company, where he worked with companies facing operational and financial challenges and undergoing “good to great” transformations. Before that, he was an Operating Partner at Silver Lake Partners, a global leader in technology and held a similar position at Cerberus Capital LP. Jeff started his career as a Manufacturing Team Manager and Engineering Project Manager at Procter & Gamble before becoming a strategy consultant at Bain & Company and holding executive roles at Dell EMC and Transamerica Corporation. Jeff earned a B.S. in electrical engineering at Kansas State University and an M.B.A. at Dartmouth College.
Entertainment

Peloton’s terrible, horrible, no good, very bad year

2022 just started, and Peloton has already halted bike production and is talking about mass layoffs. How did the pandemic darling get here?

How did Peloton go from pandemic star to sinking ship? One answer is the classic problem of supply and demand.

Image: Peloton; Protocol

It’s been a hell of a ride for Peloton. The headlines have been practically nonstop, from 2019’s cringey wife ad to 2021’s series of unfortunate “Sex and The City” events. But in 2020, Peloton could do no wrong. The at-home fitness company saw a 172% spike in sales over the course of that year, buoyed by the pandemic forcing wealthy gym-goers to stay home.

But nothing is ever easy or certain when it comes to Peloton. In the past week, Business Insider reported that Peloton is considering laying off 41% of its sales and marketing staff and closing down stores. CNBC learned that the company has hired McKinsey & Co. to help cut costs. And yesterday, CNBC reported that Peloton is temporarily halting production of its bikes. Peloton shares promptly plunged 24%.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Entertainment

Netflix looks to expand gaming with major IP deals, Fortnite-like updates

Remarks made to investors and recent job postings hint at big ambitions for Netflix’s nascent gaming efforts.

Netflix may be taking some cues from games like Fortnite and Apex: Legends for its own video game initiative.

Photo: Cameron Venti/Unsplash

Two months after launching mobile games to all of its members, Netflix is looking to double down on gaming: The company told investors Thursday that it wants to expand its portfolio of games “across both casual and core gaming genres.” Recent job offers suggest that this could include both live services games as well as an expansion to PC and console gaming, and the company's COO hinted at major licensing deals ahead.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Policy

Tim Cook, Ted Cruz and the strange politics of tech antitrust

Democrats and Republicans have found the tech reform debate scrambles traditional party politics — and the Apple CEO and Texas senator have found themselves chatting.

The Senate Judiciary Committee advanced a bill on Thursday that could remake the tech industry.

Photo: PartTime Portraits/Unsplash

Strange alliances formed ahead of Thursday's vote to advance a key antitrust bill to the Senate floor, with frequent foes like Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Ted Cruz supporting the measure, and prominent Democrats including California Sen. Dianne Feinstein pushing back against it.

Ultimately the bill moved out of the Senate Judiciary Committee by a vote of 16-6 after a surprisingly speedy debate (at least, speedy for the Senate). Even some of the lawmakers who called for further changes agreed to move the bill forward — a sign that the itch to finally regulate Big Tech after years of congressional inaction is intensifying, even as the issue scrambles traditional party politics in a way that could threaten its final passage.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories
Bulletins