Racial equity at tech companies is hard to measure. This index wants to change that.

Companies such as Uber, SurveyMonkey and others have already opted in to this new system.

Black Lives Matter sign

A new index wants to help measure racial equity across tech companies.

Photo: Mark Makela/Getty Images

Many tech companies have produced annual diversity reports for the past several years, but comparing companies to each other can be challenging, since there's still no standardized way of evaluating them. The Race Equality Index, spearheaded by the Race Equality Project, aims to do that.

"We got underwhelmed with the way companies and even external media track and rank companies based on DEI," Dion McKenzie, co-creator of the Race Equality Project, told Protocol. "It only tells one piece of the pie, and even that's not standardized across the different companies."

The index measures how companies are performing in regards to diversity, equity and inclusion, and how they stack up against their counterparts in the tech industry. Many DEI leaders are already in conversation with each other, McKenzie said, but this "allows companies to have a conversation around a similar framework."

Companies face evaluation in eight areas: benefits and education, recruiting and talent management, representation, inclusive design practice, learning, employee resource groups (ERGs), the DEI department and public statements.

Already, the index has collected data from companies such as Uber, SurveyMonkey, New Relic and GitLab. The goal is to create a definitive benchmark for equity in tech from which companies with a staff between 500 to 10,000 employees can learn and grow.

There are a handful of existing indexes that pertain to the inclusion of women, disabled people, working mothers and LGBTQIA+ employees, but there's nothing really "from a race and ethnicity standpoint," Uber Chief Diversity Officer Bo Young Lee told Protocol.

Uber felt motivated to participate because "there is no universally accepted index around racial equity out there," she said.

"There is no one really smashing it out the park with racial equity in tech," McKenzie said. "That's not a good thing, but it's an interesting thing when companies can see with their peers how they're doing and how off they are from the benchmark. The more companies that contribute to the index, the more beneficial it becomes."

To compile the index, companies answer questions such as "What is the current annual budget allocated for the exclusive discretion of your company's D&I leader?" and "Are your hiring managers required to interview a certain percentage of BIPOC candidates for all roles that will have direct reports?"

As an early participant in the index, Lee also provided some constructive feedback. For example, she suggested that the index take into account how race is related to socioeconomic status.

"We know that tuition support can lead to more racial equity in the workplace, but you wouldn't necessarily see it through that lens," Lee said.

Companies themselves are responsible for filling out the information. It's mostly chief diversity officers or other diversity leaders who engage with the index, Mandy Bynum, co-founder of the Race Equality Project, told Protocol. Initially, some companies gave "some pretty BS answers," but the process still led to important conversations, she said.

"All companies were on the same page, but there was still a bit of that defensiveness and white fragility, frankly, going on," Bynum explained.

In the pilot program, the index collectively gave Uber, GitLab, New Relic and SurveyMonkey an overall score of 5.8 out of 10. Collectively, the companies scored the worst in development and education and leadership and organizational development. The development and education section includes questions about, for example, whether the company provides certifications, workshops or conference attendance for BIPOC employees. Leadership and organizational development asks, for example, if the company offers professional development programs for BIPOC employees. As a group, the companies scored highest with ERGs. One question in that category asks if the named leaders of the company's ERGs are compensated for their time either through salary or bonus programs.

The Project doesn't share company-specific results with any other company, in order to encourage honest participation in the index. Instead, each company gets its own unique dashboard that shows how it compares to the aggregate of other companies in the index.

Uber did not come out at the top, Lee said, but it was good to see where it was leading, where it was on par with other companies and "where there were lagging areas."

"It gave us a sense of, 'OK, we thought we were doing well in this area. It looks like we'll have to do a bit more,'" she said. The index also validated for Uber that it's doing racial equity work across all the listed areas. "There wasn't a big, glaring hole," Lee said.

Participating companies can use the index results as a tool to support their goals and needs. Diversity leaders have previously said they've faced uphill battles at their respective companies when it comes to getting budget and resources.

"That's accurate," Bynum said.

The index found that diversity budgets of participating companies ranged from $25 per employee per year to $150 per employee per year. The index does not reveal, however, how DEI teams' budgets compare to other departments. But if one company finds that their counterparts are all doing something they're not, it could help DEI leaders' case for a bigger budget moving forward.

The index has also helped DEI leaders learn from their counterparts in other companies, McKenzie said. For example, companies in the pilot shared with others how they have gone about trying to remove implicit bias from the hiring process. For Uber, one takeaway was that it needs to do more to increase accountability among the 50 or so managers below the company's executive leadership team, Lee said.

This week, the index is rolling out to the next batch of companies. The Race Equality Project expects about 30 companies to participate in this year's index. So far, they have 20 confirmed participants that have through June to complete the questionnaire.

It's free for companies to participate in the index, but a full report will run a business about $5,000, and a deeper dive costs upwards of $12,500. Companies that participated in the pilot received everything for free.

Uber plans to participate in the upcoming index and Lee hopes that all the companies that made racial justice commitments last summer will also participate.

Uber was one of many companies that made one of these commitments last year. In July, Uber committed to being an anti-racist company. Despite that commitment, Uber's Black employee base declined from 9.3% in 2019 to 7.5% in 2020. Uber will release its next diversity report this year.

While broad support for increasing racial equity exists nationwide, Lee recognizes that they are hard conversations to have — ones that can make people feel uncomfortable.

While Lee hopes this isn't the case, "the same racial biases that exist in society may slow down the growth of the index."

Google’s latest plans for Chromecast are all about free TV

The company is in talks to add dozens of free linear channels to its newest streaming dongle.

Google launched its new Google TV service a year ago. Now, the company wants to add free TV channels to it.

Photo: Google

Google is looking to make its Chromecast streaming device more appealing to cord cutters. The company has plans to add free TV channels to Google TV, the Android-based smart TV platform that powers Chromecast as well as select smart TVs from companies including Sony and TCL, Protocol has learned.

To achieve this, Google has held talks with companies distributing so-called FAST (free, ad-supported streaming television) channels, according to multiple industry insiders. These channels have the look and feel of traditional linear TV networks, complete with ad breaks and on-screen graphics. Free streaming channels could launch on Google TV as early as this fall, but the company may also wait to announce the initiative in conjunction with its smart TV partners in early 2022.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

While it's easy to get lost in the operational and technical side of a transaction, it's important to remember the third component of a payment. That is, the human behind the screen.

Over the last two years, many retailers have seen the benefit of investing in new, flexible payments. Ones that reflect the changing lifestyles of younger spenders, who are increasingly holding onto their cash — despite reports to the contrary. This means it's more important than ever for merchants to take note of the latest payment innovations so they can tap into the savings of the COVID-19 generation.

Keep Reading Show less
Antoine Nougue,

Antoine Nougue is Head of Europe at He works with ambitious enterprise businesses to help them scale and grow their operations through payment processing services. He is responsible for leading the European sales, customer success, engineering & implementation teams and is based out of London, U.K.

Protocol | Policy

Iris scans for food in Jordanian refugee camps

More than 80% of the refugees in Jordanian camps now use iris scans to pay for their groceries. Refugee advocates say this is a huge future privacy problem.

A refugee uses their iris to access their account.

Photo: KHALIL MAZRAAWI/AFP via Getty Images

Every day, tens of thousands of refugees in the two main camps in Jordan pay for their groceries and withdraw their cash not with a card, but with a scan of their eye.

Nowhere in the United States can someone pay for groceries with an iris scan (though the Department of Homeland Security is considering collecting iris scans from U.S. immigrants, and Clear uses iris scans to verify identities for paying customers at airports) — but in the Jordanian refugee camps, biometric scanners are an everyday sight at grocery stores and ATMs. More than 80% of the 33,000-plus refugees who receive cash assistance and (most of them Syrian) and live in these camps use the United Nations' Refugee Agency iris-scanning system, which verifies identity through eye scans in order to distribute cash and food refugee assistance. Refugees can opt out of the program, but verifying identity without it is so complex that most do not.

Keep Reading Show less
Anna Kramer

Anna Kramer is a reporter at Protocol (Twitter: @ anna_c_kramer, email:, where she writes about labor and workplace issues. Prior to joining the team, she covered tech and small business for the San Francisco Chronicle and privacy for Bloomberg Law. She is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she studied International Relations and Arabic and wrote her senior thesis about surveillance tools and technological development in the Middle East.

Protocol | China

Weibo is muzzling users for discussing a landmark #metoo case

A number of accounts have been suspended, even deleted, after voicing support for the plaintiff.

Photo: Photo by Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

As a Beijing court dismissed China's landmark sexual harassment case on Tuesday, Weibo censors acted to muzzle a number of accounts that voiced support for the accuser, or even simply discussed the trial beforehand.

In 2018, the plaintiff Zhou Xiaoxuan, better known by the nickname Xianzi, filed a high-profile #MeToo case against Zhu Jun, a renowned state broadcast show host. Zhou claimed that Zhu sexually harassed her while she was an intern on Zhu's show in 2014. Chinese web users have closely followed the civil suit, which has also drawn international media attention.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu is a reporter with Protocol | China. Her writing has appeared in Foreign Policy, The New York Times and POLITICO, among other publications. She can be reached at

Protocol | Enterprise

Take that, Slack: ServiceNow gets a little closer to Microsoft Teams

ServiceNow is expanding its decade-long partnership with Microsoft as both companies intensify their rivalry with Salesforce.

Microsoft and ServiceNow's "coopetition" is aimed at a higher goal: undermining Salesforce, which is fast becoming the main rival for both vendors.

Photo: Uwe Anspach/Getty Images

For ServiceNow, Microsoft is the lesser of two evils compared to Salesforce.

After ditching Slack for Teams following the Salesforce acquisition, ServiceNow is deepening its decade-long partnership with Microsoft, promising co-development of new products and fresh integration capabilities within Teams, it plans to announce Thursday.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a senior reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software, including industry giants like Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle. He previously covered emerging technology for Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or

Latest Stories