Racial equity at tech companies is hard to measure. This index wants to change that.

Companies such as Uber, SurveyMonkey and others have already opted in to this new system.

Black Lives Matter sign

A new index wants to help measure racial equity across tech companies.

Photo: Mark Makela/Getty Images

Many tech companies have produced annual diversity reports for the past several years, but comparing companies to each other can be challenging, since there's still no standardized way of evaluating them. The Race Equality Index, spearheaded by the Race Equality Project, aims to do that.

"We got underwhelmed with the way companies and even external media track and rank companies based on DEI," Dion McKenzie, co-creator of the Race Equality Project, told Protocol. "It only tells one piece of the pie, and even that's not standardized across the different companies."

The index measures how companies are performing in regards to diversity, equity and inclusion, and how they stack up against their counterparts in the tech industry. Many DEI leaders are already in conversation with each other, McKenzie said, but this "allows companies to have a conversation around a similar framework."

Companies face evaluation in eight areas: benefits and education, recruiting and talent management, representation, inclusive design practice, learning, employee resource groups (ERGs), the DEI department and public statements.

Already, the index has collected data from companies such as Uber, SurveyMonkey, New Relic and GitLab. The goal is to create a definitive benchmark for equity in tech from which companies with a staff between 500 to 10,000 employees can learn and grow.

There are a handful of existing indexes that pertain to the inclusion of women, disabled people, working mothers and LGBTQIA+ employees, but there's nothing really "from a race and ethnicity standpoint," Uber Chief Diversity Officer Bo Young Lee told Protocol.

Uber felt motivated to participate because "there is no universally accepted index around racial equity out there," she said.

"There is no one really smashing it out the park with racial equity in tech," McKenzie said. "That's not a good thing, but it's an interesting thing when companies can see with their peers how they're doing and how off they are from the benchmark. The more companies that contribute to the index, the more beneficial it becomes."

To compile the index, companies answer questions such as "What is the current annual budget allocated for the exclusive discretion of your company's D&I leader?" and "Are your hiring managers required to interview a certain percentage of BIPOC candidates for all roles that will have direct reports?"

As an early participant in the index, Lee also provided some constructive feedback. For example, she suggested that the index take into account how race is related to socioeconomic status.

"We know that tuition support can lead to more racial equity in the workplace, but you wouldn't necessarily see it through that lens," Lee said.

Companies themselves are responsible for filling out the information. It's mostly chief diversity officers or other diversity leaders who engage with the index, Mandy Bynum, co-founder of the Race Equality Project, told Protocol. Initially, some companies gave "some pretty BS answers," but the process still led to important conversations, she said.

"All companies were on the same page, but there was still a bit of that defensiveness and white fragility, frankly, going on," Bynum explained.

In the pilot program, the index collectively gave Uber, GitLab, New Relic and SurveyMonkey an overall score of 5.8 out of 10. Collectively, the companies scored the worst in development and education and leadership and organizational development. The development and education section includes questions about, for example, whether the company provides certifications, workshops or conference attendance for BIPOC employees. Leadership and organizational development asks, for example, if the company offers professional development programs for BIPOC employees. As a group, the companies scored highest with ERGs. One question in that category asks if the named leaders of the company's ERGs are compensated for their time either through salary or bonus programs.

The Project doesn't share company-specific results with any other company, in order to encourage honest participation in the index. Instead, each company gets its own unique dashboard that shows how it compares to the aggregate of other companies in the index.

Uber did not come out at the top, Lee said, but it was good to see where it was leading, where it was on par with other companies and "where there were lagging areas."

"It gave us a sense of, 'OK, we thought we were doing well in this area. It looks like we'll have to do a bit more,'" she said. The index also validated for Uber that it's doing racial equity work across all the listed areas. "There wasn't a big, glaring hole," Lee said.

Participating companies can use the index results as a tool to support their goals and needs. Diversity leaders have previously said they've faced uphill battles at their respective companies when it comes to getting budget and resources.

"That's accurate," Bynum said.

The index found that diversity budgets of participating companies ranged from $25 per employee per year to $150 per employee per year. The index does not reveal, however, how DEI teams' budgets compare to other departments. But if one company finds that their counterparts are all doing something they're not, it could help DEI leaders' case for a bigger budget moving forward.

The index has also helped DEI leaders learn from their counterparts in other companies, McKenzie said. For example, companies in the pilot shared with others how they have gone about trying to remove implicit bias from the hiring process. For Uber, one takeaway was that it needs to do more to increase accountability among the 50 or so managers below the company's executive leadership team, Lee said.

This week, the index is rolling out to the next batch of companies. The Race Equality Project expects about 30 companies to participate in this year's index. So far, they have 20 confirmed participants that have through June to complete the questionnaire.

It's free for companies to participate in the index, but a full report will run a business about $5,000, and a deeper dive costs upwards of $12,500. Companies that participated in the pilot received everything for free.

Uber plans to participate in the upcoming index and Lee hopes that all the companies that made racial justice commitments last summer will also participate.

Uber was one of many companies that made one of these commitments last year. In July, Uber committed to being an anti-racist company. Despite that commitment, Uber's Black employee base declined from 9.3% in 2019 to 7.5% in 2020. Uber will release its next diversity report this year.

While broad support for increasing racial equity exists nationwide, Lee recognizes that they are hard conversations to have — ones that can make people feel uncomfortable.

While Lee hopes this isn't the case, "the same racial biases that exist in society may slow down the growth of the index."


A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.


Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well-established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories