Robinhood banned GameStop buying. Now Webull has, too.

Much like Twitter and Facebook, Robinhood seems to have found itself out of options.

Robinhood app

Robinhood lets anyone trade — but they can't trade the stocks they want to right now.

Photo: Robinhood

On Thursday morning, Robinhood started blocking users from buying stock in GameStop, AMC, BlackBerry, Nokia and other stocks at the epicenter of wild market volatility. "In light of recent volatility, we are restricting transactions for certain securities to position closing only," the company said. Other trading apps were soon forced to follow suit, when clearing house Apex said it would no longer accept buy orders of some of the volatile stocks.

On its face, Robinhood's decision doesn't quite make sense. Robinhood has seemingly benefited from the retail investor-fueled boom: The long-time favorite of Reddit's WallStreetBets community has rapidly gained traction in the wider world, surging to the top of the U.S. App Store charts on Wednesday.

By blocking the most popular stocks from being traded, Robinhood instantly ignited fury from some of its users. "This is market manipulation" was the headline of one top Reddit post this morning, while another proposed a class action lawsuit against the company. These people know how to hold a grudge, remember: They've spent the past week boosting GameStop stock partly because they're mad at a hedge fund.

Robinhood's not the only brokerage to take action. Others, including Interactive Brokers, TD Ameritrade and Charles Schwab have introduced certain restrictions, such as raising margin requirements. But Robinhood appears to be the only U.S. brokerage to have voluntarily banned purchases — and as the poster child of democratized retail investing, the decision feels both more important and unexpected than the others'.

So why did Robinhood do it? It seems to be betting that it's the least bad of the available options. While Redditors might know what they're doing with these stocks, the bulk of the people downloading the app on Thursday morning probably couldn't explain how the GameStop short squeeze works. If the stock crashes — which many think is inevitable — those new, inexperienced users will likely be very, very mad. Looking for someone to blame, they might pick Robinhood for failing to protect them.

It's not just users Robinhood has to worry about, either. Last month, regulators in Massachusetts filed a complaint against the company for exposing investors to "unnecessary trading risks." They accused it of "falling far short of its fiduciary standard" to investors, arguing that the company has gamified stock trading to an unhealthy degree. Stepping in today is one way for the company to show that it is willing to protect investors when they're at risk, potentially keeping regulators at bay.

Earlier in the day, Robinhood users appeared to be abandoning ship in favor of other apps, including Webull and Public. But the party ended for both of them, too, when Apex said it would no longer accept buy orders for the stocks. Still, by pulling the plug later than Robinhood, and by blaming a third party for the decision, Webull and Public might be able to save face.In the same way that Twitter and Facebook's Trump ban boosted moderation-light apps like Parler, Telegram and Gab, Robinhood's difficult decision could light a fuse under its competition.

This story is developing and has been continually updated.

Fintech

Election markets are far from a sure bet

Kalshi has big-name backing for its plan to offer futures contracts tied to election results. Will that win over a long-skeptical regulator?

Whether Kalshi’s election contracts could be considered gaming or whether they serve a true risk-hedging purpose is one of the top questions the CFTC is weighing in its review.

Photo illustration: Getty Images; Protocol

Crypto isn’t the only emerging issue on the CFTC’s plate. The futures regulator is also weighing a fintech sector that has similarly tricky political implications: election bets.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has set Oct. 28 as a date by which it hopes to decide whether the New York-based startup Kalshi can offer a form of wagering up to $25,000 on which party will control the House of Representatives and Senate after the midterms. PredictIt, another online market for election trading, has also sued the regulator over its decision to cancel a no-action letter.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Enterprise

The Uber verdict shows why mandatory disclosure isn't such a bad idea

The conviction of Uber's former chief security officer, Joe Sullivan, seems likely to change some minds in the debate over proposed cyber incident reporting regulations.

Executives and boards will now be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up," said one information security veteran.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

If nothing else, the guilty verdict delivered Wednesday in a case involving Uber's former security head will have this effect on how breaches are handled in the future: Executives and boards, according to information security veteran Michael Hamilton, will be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up."

Following the conviction of former Uber chief security officer Joe Sullivan, "we likely will get better voluntary reporting" of cyber incidents, said Hamilton, formerly the chief information security officer of the City of Seattle, and currently the founder and CISO at cybersecurity vendor Critical Insight.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.

Climate

Delta and MIT are running flight tests to fix contrails

The research team and airline are running flight tests to determine if it’s possible to avoid the climate-warming effects of contrails.

Delta and MIT just announced a partnership to test how to mitigate persistent contrails.

Photo: Gabriela Natiello/Unsplash

Contrails could be responsible for up to 2% of all global warming, and yet how they’re formed and how to mitigate them is barely understood by major airlines.

That may be changing.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Entertainment

Inside Amazon’s free video strategy

Amazon has been doubling down on original content for Freevee, its ad-supported video service, which has seen a lot of growth thanks to a deep integration with other Amazon properties.

Freevee’s investment into original programming like 'Bosch: Legacy' has increased by 70%.

Photo: Tyler Golden/Amazon Freevee

Amazon’s streaming efforts have long been all about Prime Video. So the company caught pundits by surprise when, in early 2019, it launched a stand-alone ad-supported streaming service called IMDb Freedive, with Techcrunch calling the move “a bit odd.”

Nearly four years and two rebrandings later, Amazon’s ad-supported video efforts appear to be flourishing. Viewership of the service grew by 138% from 2020 to 2021, according to Amazon. The company declined to share any updated performance data on the service, which is now called Freevee, but a spokesperson told Protocol the performance of originals in particular “exceeded expectations,” leading Amazon to increase investments into original content by 70% year-over-year.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Latest Stories
Bulletins