Sean Parker's stealthy startup abandons plans to make its own hardware

SR Labs is now building apps for Hollywood awards voters.

photo of Napster co-founder Sean Parker

Sean Parker's Hollywood startup SR Labs has been operating in stealth for the past five years.

Photo: Paul Archuleta/FilmMagic/Getty Images

Sean Parker's stealthy startup SR Labs wanted to revolutionize the way consumers watch movies at home. Now, the company is embracing a slightly less ambitious idea: SR Labs, which was known as Screening Room until a 2020 rebrand, has built a service called Circuit that aims to help studios securely deliver so-called screener copies of their movies to Hollywood awards voters.

The startup's pivot is emblematic of the rapid change the entire film industry has undergone over the past 24 months: While many in the industry long resisted any changes to the theatrical release model, COVID-19 has pushed studios like Disney and Warner Bros. to release their movies on their own streaming services.

Circuit hasn't been officially announced yet, but SR Labs has already published a Roku app for the service, and also built a CMS system for studios to upload video files. Trademark office records show that SR Labs first filed for a trademark for Circuit in June 2020. The company has been able to strike partnerships with "a majority of the Hollywood guilds," according to the LinkedIn profile of SR Labs biz dev director Jonathan Smith.

SR Labs did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

A web page for the Circuit FYC Roku app describes the service as "a secure streaming platform for guilds and associations to watch films and television shows under consideration for awards." An Apple TV app has also been tested by the company, but is not currently available on the App Store. These apps are notable in part because they seem to signal that SR Labs has given up on plans to release its own streaming hardware.

Circuit is SL Labs' first known product to speak of; the company made headlines in 2016 when news leaked about its plans to securely deliver movies to viewers at home the same day the films were debuting in theaters. The Screening Room service was supposed to use a $150 set-top box to thwart piracy, and charge consumers $50 for each movie.

To appease Hollywood, the company reportedly planned to pay theater chains as much as $20 of that fee. However, those plans were met with a massive backlash from the industry, with vocal critics including famed director James Cameron and former Warner Bros. CEO Kevin Tsujihara.

Still called Screening Room at the time, the company didn't respond to any of that criticism, or even publicly acknowledge it at all. SR Labs only came out of stealth in June 2020, when it announced its rebrand, as well as $27.5 million in funding. The company did not disclose its list of funders, but reportedly secured a $2.5 million investment from Oracle in late 2017.

Parker, who rose to fame co-founding Napster and as the first president of Facebook, used that occasion to paint SR Labs as a savior of theaters threatened by COVID-19 shutdowns: "We must do everything in our power to preserve the time-honored tradition of theatrical exhibition at this pivotal moment, when its very existence is under threat."

One year later, that threat still exists, with the delta variant once again deterring people from going to theaters. However, the industry seems to have leapfrogged the original Screening Room model, with studios embracing shorter theater release models and day-and-date releases of films on their own streaming services — changes that will likely persist even after the pandemic subsides.

Protocol | Enterprise

Startups are pouncing as SaaS giants struggle in the intelligence race

Companies like Salesforce and Workday spent the last two decades building walled gardens around their systems. Now, it's a mad dash to make those ecosystems more open.

Companies want to predict the future, and "systems of intelligence" might be their best bet.

Image: Yuichiro Chino / Getty Images

Take a look at any software vendor's marketing materials and you're sure to see some variation of the word "intelligence" splattered everywhere.

It's part of a tectonic shift happening within enterprise technology. Companies spent the last several years moving their systems to the internet and, along the way, rapidly adopting new applications.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a senior reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software, including industry giants like Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle. He previously covered emerging technology for Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or

Keep Reading Show less
A technology company reimagining global capital markets and economies.
Protocol | Workplace

The hottest new perk in tech: A week off for burnout recovery

In an industry where long hours are a "badge of honor," a week of rest may be the best way to retain talent.

Tech companies are giving their employees a week to rest and recover from burnout.

Photo: Kinga Cichewicz/Unsplash

In early May, the founder of Lessonly, a company that makes training software, sent out a companywide email issuing a mandate to all employees. But it wasn't the sort of mandate employees around the world have been receiving related to vaccines and masks. This mandate required that every worker take an entire week off in July.

The announcement took Lessonly's staff by surprise. "We had employees reach out and share that they were emotional, just thankful that they had the opportunity to do this," said Megan Jarvis, who leads the company's talent team and worked on planning the week off.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts
Aisha J. Counts is a reporting fellow at Protocol, based out of Los Angeles. Previously, she worked for Ernst & Young, where she researched and wrote about the future of work, the gig economy and startups. She is a graduate of the University of Southern California, where she studied business and philosophy.

Chip costs are rising. How will that affect gadget prices?

The global chip shortage is causing component costs to go up, so hardware makers are finding new ways to keep their prices low.

Chips are getting more expensive, but most consumer electronics companies have so far resisted price increases.

Photo: Chris Hondros/Getty Images

How do you get people to pay more for your products while avoiding sticker shock? That's a question consumer electronics companies are grappling with as worldwide chip shortages and component cost increases are squeezing their bottom lines.

One way to do it: Make more expensive and higher-margin products seem like a good deal to customers.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Protocol | Policy

Laws want humans to check biased AI. Research shows they can’t.

Policymakers want people to oversee — and override — biased AI. But research suggests there's no evidence to prove humans are up to the task.

The recent trend toward requiring human oversight of automated decision-making systems runs counter to mounting research about humans' inability to effectively override AI tools.

Photo: Jackal Pan/Getty Images

There was a time, not long ago, when a certain brand of technocrat could argue with a straight face that algorithms are less biased decision-makers than human beings — and not be laughed out of the room. That time has come and gone, as the perils of AI bias have entered mainstream awareness.

Awareness of bias hasn't stopped institutions from deploying algorithms to make life-altering decisions about, say, people's prison sentences or their health care coverage. But the fear of runaway AI has led to a spate of laws and policy guidance requiring or recommending that these systems have some sort of human oversight, so machines aren't making the final call all on their own. The problem is: These laws almost never stop to ask whether human beings are actually up to the job.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories