Meta was sued for its algorithm. Section 230 might not be a shield.

Can Meta be sued for its algorithm, or is the content to blame for social media addiction?

Pill capsules with Instagram and Facebook likes and notifications inside

Users are suing social media platforms over alleged harmful effects.

Illustration: Overearth/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Social media companies are under fire lately, and Section 230 may no longer provide a solid defense.

This week, Meta was slapped with eight different complaints, filed in as many states, alleging that its algorithms have contributed to mental health issues such as eating disorders, sleeplessness and suicidal thoughts or tendencies in younger users. The complaints allege that excessive time on Instagram and Facebook pose serious risks to mental health, with one plaintiff claiming that Meta “misrepresented the safety, utility, and non-addictive properties” of its platforms.

Rather than going after the content itself, these complaints target the algorithm that serves it to users — making Sec. 230, which states that Meta can’t be held legally liable for third-party content posted on its platform, no longer applicable.

A federal appeals court last year ruled that Snap could be held accountable for its speed filter, which allegedly encouraged reckless driving and caused a fatal car crash in 2017. That ruling opened the door for lawsuits like the ones filed against Meta, said Eric Goldman, co-director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University. The plaintiffs in the Snap case argued that the speed filter wasn't considered third-party content, but was rather a design choice Snap itself had made. Because the court ruled that Snap wasn’t protected by Sec. 230 in this case, others are attempting to work around the law in similar fashion.

But, Goldman argued, the Snap ruling and the cases against Meta are “qualitatively different,” because the algorithm and the content it serves are “all the same thing.”

“This idea that we can distinguish between dangerous software and dangerous third-party content on software is in my mind an illusion,” he told Protocol. “The algorithm only directs people to see content. Ultimately, it's the content that's the problem. Then we're back to the fact that that's really a Sec. 230 lawsuit.”

Goldman also noted that the lawsuits against Meta, which were filed in Texas, Tennessee, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois and Missouri, were spread out in the hopes that one of the eight judges overseeing the cases would side against the company. Goldman said what’s likely to happen if one judge rules in favor of Meta is that the rest will follow suit. The question remains if any judge will buy the plaintiff’s argument.

“Basically, it's like a lottery,” said Goldman. “You only really need to win one in order to open up a very, very big door for future litigation.”

Legislative moves

Regardless of whether Sec. 230 is in play, social media companies aren’t off the hook for platform addiction. A bill passed by the California State Assembly in late May would give parents the right to hold social media platforms responsible if their children become addicted.

Several platforms are also being investigated by attorneys general all over the country. In November, a coalition led by state AGs from California, Florida, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Jersey, Tennessee and Vermont began investigating Instagram for the ways that it keeps young people engaged. The group extended its investigation to include TikTok in March.

Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen also testified to Congress last year that Meta wasn’t forthcoming about Instagram’s effects on young people, even after internal research showed that the app exacerbated mental health issues for teen girls in particular.

“They include addictive design, features, algorithmic amplifications of disturbing content,” Common Sense Media CEO Jim Steyer told me. “Those are just some of the tactics that social media platforms like Meta use.”

Amid public pressure, social media companies seem to be showing signs of wanting to limit user addiction. TikTok announced Thursday that it’s rolling out more screen time controls to help users limit the amount of time they spend scrolling. Instagram implemented similar daily time limits, but quietly rolled back the ability for mobile users to set a daily time limit reminder lower than 30 minutes. Though these moves seem good on the surface, time limits like these are easy to surpass, and may just be a tactic for these companies to save face given that they want to keep users actively using the platform for as long as possible.

If states continue to pass legislation to hold social media platforms responsible for content posted on their platforms, Congress or the Supreme Court may step in to amend or clarify Sec. 230. That could reshape the way social media companies operate altogether.

“We're at a watershed moment, and in the next few years, we are finally going to see major action on multiple fronts,” Steyer said.


Niantic’s future hinges on mapping the metaverse

The maker of Pokémon Go is hoping the metaverse will deliver its next big break.

Niantic's new standalone messaging and social app, Campfire, is a way to get players organizing and meeting up in the real world. It launches today for select Pokémon Go players.

Image: Niantic

Pokémon Go sent Niantic to the moon. But now the San Francisco-based augmented reality developer has returned to earth, and it’s been trying to chart its way back to the stars ever since. The company yesterday announced layoffs of about 8% of its workforce (about 85 to 90 people) and canceled four projects, Bloomberg reported, signaling another disappointment for the studio that still generates about $1 billion in revenue per year from Pokémon Go.

Finding its next big hit has been Niantic’s priority for years, and the company has been coming up short. For much of the past year or so, Niantic has turned its attention to the metaverse, with hopes that its location-based mobile games, AR tech and company philosophy around fostering physical connection and outdoor exploration can help it build what it now calls the “real world metaverse.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

Supreme Court takes a sledgehammer to greenhouse gas regulations

The court ruled 6-3 that the EPA cannot use the Clean Air Act to regulate power plant greenhouse gas emissions. That leaves a patchwork of policies from states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack.

The Supreme Court struck a major blow to the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Striking down the right to abortion may be the Supreme Court's highest-profile decision this term. But on Thursday, the court handed down an equally massive verdict on the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In the case of West Virginia v. EPA, the court decided that the agency has no ability to regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act. Weakening the federal government's powers leaves a patchwork of states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack in reducing carbon pollution.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.


Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at

Latest Stories