People

Snap scraps racist coding terms in diversity and inclusion push

Snap's latest diversity report details the demographic makeup of the company and outlines how it's working to create a more inclusive culture.

Snap scraps racist coding terms in diversity and inclusion push

Snap releases its latest diversity report.

Photo: Thought Catalog/Unsplash

Snap, like many other tech companies, has a less-than-stellar diversity track record.

In 2016, Snap faced backlash over a Bob Marley filter that resulted in blackface. About a year ago, Snap apologized for a special Juneteenth filter that asked users to smile in order to break the chains. Then, in November 2020, Snap concluded an investigation into allegations of racial bias inside the company, saying it didn't find "a widespread pattern" of that type of behavior on the team in question, but it did identify ways to foster a more inclusive environment.

Snap did not explicitly call out those incidents in its 50-page diversity report, released today, but the company did say it's working to eradicate bias from its product as well as inspire empathy in conversations about diversity and inclusion. The company also detailed its plans to remove outdated language from its code base.

Last summer's racial injustice awakening prompted renewed conversations in the tech industry around the use of terminology that is rooted in racism. Twitter, for example, said last year it would begin removing terms like "master" and "slave" from its database.

Snap is now in the process of replacing similarly outdated language in its coding base. For example, Snap has already renamed "Master" to "Gold" in its internal beta version of the Snapchat app.

Snap also plans to change "slave" to "secondary," "whitelist" to "allowlist" and "blacklist" to "blocklist." Snap says the engineering team is in a year-long project to fully remove those terms from the company's code base.

Snap began making these changes back in July, shortly after many tech companies began thinking of ways to further racial justice and equity within their own companies, Snap VP of diversity, equity and inclusion Oona King told Protocol.

"We felt it was important to get away from that legacy [of] truly non-inclusive language," King said.

Snap is also actively working with "a diverse group of experts" around its camera technology to reduce bias and wants to better understand potential "failure scenarios" where its machine learning models adopt biases, the company said.

"Cameras still haven't widened their aperture to encompass all communities and skin tones," the report states. "We want to change that. Our Snapchat Camera is playing an increasingly important role in the lives of our community, and we are building a more inclusive camera that works for each Snapchatter regardless of who they are and what they look like, and is flexible enough to support their creativity and self-expression."

The numbers

Snap's diversity numbers paint a picture that is exactly what the masses have come to expect of tech companies: a workforce that is predominantly white and male.

Globally, Snap employees are just 33% female and 65.7% male. In the U.S., Snap's workforce is 47% white, 34.3% Asian, 6.3% Hispanic/Latinx, 4.9% Black, 0.2% Indigenous, 2.1% Middle Eastern/North African/Arab and 5.2% multiple races.


Snap's 2020 workforce data breakdown.Image: Snap

The company's leadership level is similarly predominantly white and male. Snap did, however, make some slight progress in this area compared to last year. The company nearly doubled the percentage of women in tech leadership roles, and increased the representation of women on Snap's board of directors from 37.5% to 50%. Snap also increased the percentage of underrepresented racial minorities in leadership roles from 13.1% to 13.6%.

By the end of 2025, Snap aims to have underrepresented racial minorities make up 20% of its staff, increase representation of women in tech roles to 25% and increase the number of women and underrepresented minorities in leadership positions by 30%.

Retention is an important indicator of how people of color are faring at a company. Despite seeing reduced overall attrition in 2020, Snap saw women as well as Black, Hispanic/Latinx and Indigenous employees leave at above-average rates.


Snap


"These figures are more or less standard across the tech industry," King said. "That doesn't mean it's good, obviously."

Snap highlighted its attrition rates because it wants to hold itself accountable, King said.

"Too often, people are just focused on hiring" when it comes to diversity efforts, she said.

King pointed to Snap's employee resource groups as an example of how the company is further addressing issues of inclusion. Snap recently began evaluating team members on DEI impact in their performance reviews. That means employees involved in ERGs will be rewarded for their work, King said.

"They carry a lot of the burden of this work," she said. "If DEI is everyone's job, then you can't keep relying on women to solve sexism, on the Black and brown people to solve racism, on the LGBTQ people to solve homophobia. The same with disability and solving accessibility."

Theranos’ investor pitches go on trial

Prosecutors in the Elizabeth Holmes fraud case are now highlighting allegations the company sought to mislead investors.

The fresh details of unproven claims made about the viability of Theranos' blood tests and efforts to conceal errors when demonstrating testing equipment added to the evidence against Holmes, who is accused of fraud in her role leading the company.

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The Theranos trial continued this week with testimony from Daniel Edlin, a former product manager at the blood-testing startup, and Shane Weber, a scientist from Pfizer. Their testimonies appeared to bolster the government's argument that Holmes intentionally defrauded investors and patients.

The fresh details about audacious and unproven claims made about the viability of Theranos' blood tests and efforts to conceal errors when demonstrating testing equipment added to the evidence against Holmes, who is accused of fraud in her role leading the company.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts

Aisha Counts (@aishacounts) is a reporting fellow at Protocol, based out of Los Angeles. Previously, she worked for Ernst & Young, where she researched and wrote about the future of work, emerging technologies and startups. She is a graduate of the University of Southern California, where she studied business and philosophy. She can be reached at acounts@protocol.com.

The way we work has fundamentally changed. COVID-19 upended business dealings and office work processes, putting into hyperdrive a move towards digital collaboration platforms that allow teams to streamline processes and communicate from anywhere. According to the International Data Corporation, the revenue for worldwide collaboration applications increased 32.9 percent from 2019 to 2020, reaching $22.6 billion; it's expected to become a $50.7 billion industry by 2025.

"While consumers and early adopter businesses had widely embraced collaborative applications prior to the pandemic, the market saw five years' worth of new users in the first six months of 2020," said Wayne Kurtzman, research director of social and collaboration at IDC. "This has cemented collaboration, at least to some extent, for every business, large and small."

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Silver

Kate Silver is an award-winning reporter and editor with 15-plus years of journalism experience. Based in Chicago, she specializes in feature and business reporting. Kate's reporting has appeared in the Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Atlantic's CityLab, Atlas Obscura, The Telegraph and many other outlets.

Protocol | Policy

8 takeaways from states’ new filing against Google

New details have been unsealed in the states' antitrust suit against Google for anticompetitive behavior in the ads market.

Google is facing complaints by government competition enforcers on several fronts.

Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Up to 22%: That's the fee Google charges publishers for sales on its online ad exchanges, according to newly unredacted details in a complaint by several state attorneys general.

The figure is just one of the many details that a court allowed the states to unveil Friday. Many had more or less remained secrets inside Google and the online publishing industry, even through prior legal complaints and eager public interest.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Protocol | Workplace

This tech founder uses a converted Sprinter van as an office on wheels

The CEO of productivity startup Rock likes to work on the road. Here's how he does it — starting with three different WiFi hotspots.

Kenzo Fong, founder and CEO of the 20-person productivity software startup Rock, has been working out of his converted Mercedes-Benz Sprinter van since the pandemic began.

Photo: Kenzo Fong/Rock

Plenty of techies have started companies in garages. Try running a startup from a van.

In San Francisco, one software company founder has been using a converted Mercedes-Benz Sprinter van — picture an Amazon delivery vehicle — as a mobile office.

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.
Protocol | Policy

Most Americans want AI regulation — and they want it yesterday

In a poll, people said they wanted to see artificial intelligence technologies develop in the U.S. — alongside rules governing their use.

U.S. lawmakers have only just begun the long process of regulating the use of AI.

Photo: Louis Velazquez/Unsplash

Nearly two-thirds of Americans want the U.S to regulate the development and use of artificial intelligence in the next year or sooner — with half saying that regulation should have begun yesterday, according to a Morning Consult poll. Another 13% say that regulation should start in the next year.

"You can thread this together," Austin Carson, founder of new nonprofit group SeedAI and former government relations lead for Nvidia, said in an email. "Half or more Americans want to address all of these things, split pretty evenly along ideological lines."

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

ai
Latest Stories