Power

Sonos is betting big on a post-pandemic future, and tougher antitrust policies to boot

Sonos CEO Patrick Spence has high hopes for the new administration's antitrust policies, arguing they should benefit us as citizens, not just consumers.

Sonos is betting big on a post-pandemic future, and tougher antitrust policies to boot

Sonos's new speaker seems made for our post-pandemic future.

Photo: Sonos

Are you ready for the pandemic to be over? So is Sonos.

The smart speaker maker weathered COVID-19 unexpectedly well, with consumers snapping up sound bars and speakers to make those long days at home a little more bearable, which turned the 2020 holiday quarter into the best quarter in the company's 18-year history. "It's been a very strange, but very successful year for us," said Sonos CEO Patrick Spence.

Now, Sonos is ready for things to change. The company introduced a new small and portable speaker Tuesday, called the Roam, that seems made for our post-pandemic future. And with the Biden administration appointing antitrust experts like Tim Wu, Spence believes there may be a chance for a policy reset. In an interview with Protocol, Spence talked about his hopes for new antitrust policies, the company's plans for the coming years and why Sonos decided to fast-track the Roam speaker in the face of the pandemic.

One of the surprise winners of the lockdown was the Sonos Move, a portable $400 speaker the size of a small space heater. "That became a big product for people because they're going out to their yard or patio, I suspect," Spence said. With the Roam, Sonos is now betting that its customers are itching to venture a little further. Priced at $169, the Sonos Roam is the company's first fully portable Bluetooth speaker that doubles as a full-fledged member of the Sonos smart speaker family when within reach of a home Wi-Fi network.

"We actually prioritized [it] over other products on our roadmap when we hit the pandemic last summer," Spence said. "We couldn't have seen when things would be reopening. But with Roam, we did say: 'OK, let's get it out a little sooner.' And we were willing to push something else out that we thought would be less suited for the moment."

With the Roam, Sonos also has the potential to grow its audience. "It gives us the opportunity to speak to a new customer," said Ryan Richards, Sonos Global's product marketing director. Traditionally, the company has targeted wealthier households; Spence is scheduled to reveal at an investor event Tuesday that it is currently in 9% of the affluent homes in its existing markets. With the exception of cheaper Sonos-powered speakers made by Ikea, the Roam is the first Sonos speaker selling for less than $200.

"$169 isn't cheap," Spence said. "But in a world of thousand-dollar iPhones, it is something that is accessible for people." That also means Sonos can more easily target students and others who may not have wanted to spend hundreds of dollars on a home hi-fi system just yet. "It will appeal to a younger demographic," Spence said, adding: "We want to quadruple the number of people actually using our products and services."

Sonos has long relied on its existing customers to drive a significant chunk of its sales, with consumers adding to their home hi-fi system over time. With Move and now Roam, the company expects that trend to continue. Right now, the 11 million existing Sonos households own close to three of the company's speakers on average. In the coming years, Sonos wants that number to be more like four or six, which will allow the company to reach $2.25 billion in revenue in fiscal year 2024.

Part of that number will also be a modest but growing contribution from the company's still nascent services business. Sonos Radio, the company's ad-supported radio service that launched last April, has become the third most-listened-to music service on Sonos speakers. Its paid HD tier, launched in November, has seen "good traction," according to Spence, who laid out plans to reach 500,000 Sonos Radio HD subscribers, without specifying when exactly that may be.

Succeeding with those ambitious goals depends on Sonos beating its competition, which now includes everyone from traditional hi-fi brands to Bluetooth speaker makers to tech giants like Google and Amazon. The company has publicly feuded with the latter two, alleging anti-competitive behavior, and currently is in court against Google over alleged patent infringements.

That might be why Sonos has a very different take on the new administration's anticipated stance toward Big Tech than some of its industry compatriots. In our conversation, Spence expressed optimism about the recent appointment of Tim Wu to the National Economic Council, saying it signaled a "different perspective" on antitrust issues than the one held by the previous administration.

He also had high praise for Rep. David Cicilline, who chairs the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law, in front of which Spence testified in January 2020; he said that it was key for the administration to take steps against anti-competitive behavior. He pointed to tech companies blocking Sonos from using multiple voice assistants on their products, and pricing their speakers below cost, which Spence in the past called out as illegal predatory pricing.

Spence also argued that tech giants use what he called "efficient infringement" to steamroll smaller competitors that may not have the resources to fight patent infringement lawsuits, or simply didn't patent all the technologies they developed. "It's principles that we've had in the system. We just haven't enforced them as a country," he said, adding that there may also be a need for additional safeguards. "Hopefully we'll come up with some new ones to just make sure that we are spurring more companies, competition and entrepreneurship."

Ultimately, he said, creating an equal playing field requires a different mindset from everyone, consumers included — a mindset that isn't just focused on the cheapest possible sticker price. "Consumers are also citizens who need jobs," Spence said. "We're all part of the same system. My hope is that people think through the system and understand that it has to work for us as citizens, not just as consumers. A lower price doesn't necessarily mean that the whole system is going to be healthy and that it's going to work for everybody."

Fintech

Gavin Newsom shows crypto some California love

“A more flexible approach is needed,” Gov. Newsom said in rejecting a bill that would require crypto companies to get a state license.

Strong bipartisan support wasn’t enough to convince Newsom that requiring crypto companies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation is the smart path for California.

Photo: Jerod Harris/Getty Images for Vox Media

The Digital Financial Assets Law seemed like a legislative slam dunk in California for critics of the crypto industry.

But strong bipartisan support — it passed 71-0 in the state assembly and 31-6 in the Senate — wasn’t enough to convince Gov. Gavin Newsom that requiring crypto companies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation is the smart path for California.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Workplace

Slack’s rallying cry at Dreamforce: No more meetings

It’s not all cartoon bears and therapy pigs — work conferences are a good place to talk about the future of work.

“We want people to be able to work in whatever way works for them with flexible schedules, in meetings and out of meetings,” Slack chief product officer Tamar Yehoshua told Protocol at Dreamforce 2022.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Dreamforce is primarily Salesforce’s show. But Slack wasn’t to be left out, especially as the primary connector between Salesforce and the mainstream working world.

The average knowledge worker spends more time using a communication tool like Slack than a CRM like Salesforce, positioning it as the best Salesforce product to concern itself with the future of work. In between meeting a therapy pig and meditating by the Dreamforce waterfall, Protocol sat down with several Slack execs and conference-goers to chat about the shifting future.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

LA is a growing tech hub. But not everyone may fit.

LA has a housing crisis similar to Silicon Valley’s. And single-family-zoning laws are mostly to blame.

As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers, whose high salaries put them at an advantage in both LA's renting and buying markets.

Photo: Nat Rubio-Licht/Protocol

LA’s tech scene is on the rise. The number of unicorn companies in Los Angeles is growing, and the city has become the third-largest startup ecosystem nationally behind the Bay Area and New York with more than 4,000 VC-backed startups in industries ranging from aerospace to creators. As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers. The city is quickly becoming more and more like Silicon Valley — a new startup and a dozen tech workers on every corner and companies like Google, Netflix, and Twitter setting up offices there.

But with growth comes growing pains. Los Angeles, especially the burgeoning Silicon Beach area — which includes Santa Monica, Venice, and Marina del Rey — shares something in common with its namesake Silicon Valley: a severe lack of housing.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

Policy

SFPD can now surveil a private camera network funded by Ripple chair

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved a policy that the ACLU and EFF argue will further criminalize marginalized groups.

SFPD will be able to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks in certain circumstances.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Ripple chairman and co-founder Chris Larsen has been funding a network of security cameras throughout San Francisco for a decade. Now, the city has given its police department the green light to monitor the feeds from those cameras — and any other private surveillance devices in the city — in real time, whether or not a crime has been committed.

This week, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors approved a controversial plan to allow SFPD to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks during life-threatening emergencies, large events, and in the course of criminal investigations, including investigations of misdemeanors. The decision came despite fervent opposition from groups, including the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which say the police department’s new authority will be misused against protesters and marginalized groups in a city that has been a bastion for both.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories
Bulletins