Starlink report card: SpaceX’s satellite internet service is still catching up to broadband

From speeds to filling orders to expanding its customer base, Starlink has a long way to go before it reaches the stars.

Starlink dish

How does Starlink stack up to traditional broadband internet?

Image: Starlink/SpaceX

Click banner image for more Subscription Week 2022 coverage

Elon Musk has high hopes for SpaceX’s Starlink satellite internet service, hyping its billion-dollar revenue potential and its ability to provide high-speed internet to all corners of the globe. But SpaceX has launched just 2,000 satellites out of the tens of thousands on deck for deployment, and people are paying high costs to tap Starlink internet today — $599 just for installation, and an additional $110 per month for the basic plan.

But satellite internet nerds, Elon Musk stans and people who live in rural areas with low broadband coverage have signed up in droves for the chance to test out Starlink since it first became open from the beta program to the public in February 2021.

A year later, Musk tweeted that Starlink hit 250,000 customers. Though it's unclear what the company’s current waitlist looks like, last May, the company had 10,000 active customers and a waitlist of 500,000. In October, SpaceX pushed its wait times for Starlink to “late 2022, early 2023” after originally slating orders to ship between late 2021 to mid-2022. In a Reddit thread where Starlink customers share when they first ordered service and when they actually received it, posters are reporting wait times as long as 14 months: Some placed orders in February 2021 and just received their equipment this month. One user even reported having their preorder canceled after missing an email with their seven-day window to claim service.

“I'm no longer an excited beta user on an exclusive wait list. I'm now a sour, bitter, hater that may never forgive the company for their treatment,” the user wrote in a post. “I understand there may be more demand than supply, but to COMPLETELY cancel my order and send me to the back of the line? Wow.”

Irate early adopters aside, the important question remains: How does Starlink stack up to traditional broadband internet? In the U.S., it’s still lagging behind, according to research firm Ookla.

An Ookla report from March found that SpaceX’s internet service offers median download speeds of 104.97 megabytes per second, and upload speeds of 12.04 Mbps, lagging behind broadband providers’ median download speeds of 131.3 Mbps and upload speeds of 19.5 Mbps.

Starlink does, however, easily outperform rival satellite internet providers. HughesNet only gets download speeds of 20.92 Mbps and upload speeds of 2.54 Mbps, according to Ookla, while Viasat offers downloads at 21.81 Mbps and uploads at 2.88 Mbps.

However, Starlink’s service depends on the country. Starlink beats out broadband with massive margins in several countries, including Australia, Mexico, France, Italy, Ireland, the U.K. and Germany. Starlink also has slightly faster download speeds in Canada, with speeds of 106.6 Mbps compared to fixed broadband download speeds of 96.4 Mbps.

Though it beats out broadband in some countries, the price tag is much higher than what your average broadband ISP charges. A Starlink terminal, which includes a satellite dish and a router (which users have to install themselves), costs $599 to set up, then $110 per month for the service — and that’s just for the basic plan. The premium plan is $2,500 for setup and $500 per month for the service, promising speeds up to 500 Mbps.

Compare that to Verizon, which claims to offer download speeds of 300 Mbps for around $40 a month with a setup fee of $99 for its basic plan, or Spectrum, which offers a basic plan of 200 Mbps for around $50 per month (setup is an extra $50 for professional installation and $20 for self-installation). Of course, real-world download speeds are often far slower than the ones ISPs promise, but for the average internet user, particularly those that live in suburbs or cities, Starlink simply may not be worth it.

Starlink is designed primarily for remote and rural areas, as its satellite dishes work best with an unobstructed view of the sky. It promises download speeds between 100 and 200 Mbps, though it only reached a median download speed of more than 100 Mbps in the fourth quarter of 2021.

Starlink itself claims to deliver “high-speed, broadband internet, even to places where access has been unreliable, too expensive, or completely unavailable.”

But the service has a ways to go. For one, SpaceX needs to shoot more satellites into the sky. The company is currently working on building out Starlink’s satellite constellation, having launched more than 2,000 satellites into orbit over dozens of launches since it started at the end of 2019. SpaceX is aiming to deploy a total of 42,000 satellites, making its megaconstellation even more mega. Though speeds will likely improve once Starlink builds out its constellation, the process is costing SpaceX a pretty penny. The Starlink constellation could cost the company a total of between $20 billion and $30 billion to finish, Musk said in June.

For Starlink and other satellite internet operators to compete with fixed broadband, the cost of everything — from launching a satellite into orbit to the materials needed to make them — is going to need to go down, said Brooke Stokes, associate partner at research firm McKinsey & Company.

“Then I think you've got the question of how patient will investor capital be relative to how fast can these megaconstellation operators make markets and unlock demand,” Stokes said. This question puts Starlink, which operates the biggest satellite constellation in the sky, in a shaky position.

That doesn’t seem to deter Musk, however, whose steep investment is fueling big ambitions. Starlink could have colossal returns, bringing in as much as $30 billion annually by 2025, Musk predicted last year, making around 10 times the revenue that its launch services business would bring in. But for Starlink to actually bring in that much revenue, it would need to become more than just an internet service provider. It would need to be the internet service provider, serving tens of millions of subscribers annually. (Years ago, SpaceX predicted that Starlink would attract more than 40 million global customers by 2025. For context, Spectrum has 32 million internet customers in the U.S., and Verizon has around 6.74 million.)

Needless to say, Musk’s ambitions are, well, ambitious (though when are they not?). Blair Levin, a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and policy analyst at New Street Research, said the total addressable market of people who live in rural and remote areas and would actually be willing to pay the amount of money per month that Musk asks for Starlink is simply not high enough. And the infrastructure bill passed in November dedicated tens of billions of dollars toward grants for states to build out rural broadband, Levin said, a factor which also might take a bite out of Musk’s market in the U.S.

“That's a significant investment into the higher-functioning network that will have its [capital expenditures] paid for, and for whom the operating expenses are going to be lower,” Levin said. “So that's going to hurt the potential of [Musk’s] business.”

One possible saving grace in the bill is a $30 per month subsidy, totalling in $14 billion, allocated to rural families through the Affordable Connectivity Program to help cover the cost of internet, Levin said, bringing down the monthly cost of Starlink from $110 to $80 per person.

But Starlink may have more luck focusing on enterprise contracts, said Stokes, such as major contracts with cruise ships and airlines. Though the consumer internet market is the largest by the number of potential markets, it’s very fragmented, Stokes said, with many users not able or willing to pay the high cost for Starlink.

Starlink may have realized the importance of enterprise contracts, too: SpaceX inked its first in-flight Wi-Fi deal with JSX earlier this month to cover up to 100 planes, and is currently in talks with Delta Airlines to bring its services on board (though this partnership would likely take a few years to be realized, given that Delta would have to outfit its planes with Starlink equipment).

The verdict? From speeds to filling orders to expanding its customer base, Starlink has a long way to go. But Musk seems committed to the cause — at least unless he gets too busy taking over Twitter.


To clear the FTC, Microsoft’s Activision deal might require compromise

The FTC is in the process of reviewing the biggest-ever gaming acquisition. Here’s how it could change the Xbox business.

Will the Microsoft acquisition of Activision get through the FTC?

Image: Microsoft; Protocol

Microsoft’s planned acquisition of Activision Blizzard is the largest-ever deal in the video game market by a mile. With a sale price of $68.7 billion, the deal is nearly 450% larger than Grand Theft Auto publisher Take-Two Interactive’s acquisition of Zynga in January, the next-largest game acquisition ever recorded.

The eye-popping price underlines the scale and scope of Microsoft’s ambitions for its gaming business: If the deal is approved, Microsoft would own — alongside its current major properties, such as Halo and Minecraft — Warcraft, Overwatch and Call of Duty, to name just a few. In turn, the deal has invited a rare level of scrutiny and attention from lawmakers and policy professionals now turning their sights on an industry that’s flown under the regulatory radar for the last several decades of its existence.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.


Okta CEO: 'We should have done a better job' with the Lapsus$ breach

In an interview with Protocol, Okta CEO Todd McKinnon said the cybersecurity firm could’ve done a lot of things better after the Lapsus$ breach of a third-party support provider earlier this year.

From talking to hundreds of customers, “I've had a good sense of the sentiment and the frustrations,” McKinnon said.

Photo: David Paul Morris via Getty Images

Okta co-founder and CEO Todd McKinnon agrees with you: Disclosing a breach that impacts customer data should not take months.

“If that happens in January, customers can't be finding out about it in March,” McKinnon said in an interview with Protocol.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


Ethereum's co-founder thinks the blockchain can fix social media

But before the blockchain can fix social media, someone has to fix the blockchain. Frank McCourt, who’s put serious money behind his vision of a decentralized social media future, thinks Gavin Wood may be the key.

Gavin Wood, co-founder of Ethereum and creator of Polkadot, is helping Frank McCourt's decentralized social media initiative.

Photo: Jason Crowley

Frank McCourt, the billionaire mogul who is donating $100 million to help build decentralized alternatives to the social media giants, has picked a partner to make the blockchain work at Facebook scale: Ethereum co-founder Gavin Wood.

McCourt’s Project Liberty will work with the Web3 Foundation’s Polkadot project, it said Tuesday. Wood launched Polkadot in 2020 after leaving Ethereum. Project Liberty has a technical proposal to allow users to retain their data on a blockchain as they move among future social media services. Wood’s involvement is to give the idea a shot at actually working at the size and speed of a popular social network.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.


Gensler: Bitcoin may be a commodity

The SEC has been vague about crypto. But Gensler said bitcoin is a commodity, “maybe.” It’s the clearest glimpse of his views on digital assets yet.

“Bitcoin — maybe that’s a commodity token. That has a big market value, but that goes over there,” Gensler said, referring to another regulator, the CFTC.

Photoillustration: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Protocol

SEC Chair Gary Gensler has long argued that many cryptocurrencies are subject to regulation as securities.

But he recently clarified that this view wouldn’t apply to the best-known cryptocurrency, bitcoin.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Latest Stories