Politics

A bipartisan House bill would extend COVID-19 aid to more VC-backed startups

Some of the rules for small-business loans have deterred startups from applying, and even prompted some to retract applications.

Anna Eshoo

Rep. Anna Eshoo, a Silicon Valley Democrat, co-introduced a bill that seeks to help more startups get small-business loans under coronavirus relief packages.

Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images

A pair of lawmakers from both sides of the aisle introduced legislation Monday in the House that would ensure that more venture-capital-backed startups are eligible to receive small-business loans under federal stimulus, following a weekslong lobbying blitz from the VC and startup world.

The bill, co-sponsored by seven other lawmakers, would waive "affiliate" rules for startups that have no majority shareholder, fulfilling the wish of tech trade groups including the National Venture Capital Association. Startups for weeks have complained they are being denied the government's small-business loans, or not applying altogether, because the rules require companies to count investors and their other affiliates under the employee headcount, which is capped at 500.

The rules, meant to ensure that larger firms do not exploit Small Business Administration loan programs like the new Paycheck Protection Program, deem a company an affiliate of another when one controls, or has the power to control, the second. That has left many startups, which are frequently backed by VC firms, unable to receive the loans.

"Startups, like all small businesses in our country, are experiencing a trying time. Unfortunately, many have laid off employees while others have shuttered their businesses completely," said Rep. Anna Eshoo, the Silicon Valley Democrat who co-introduced the bill with Republican Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, who represents a part of Washington state that includes Spokane. "My legislation ensures that startups can access the Paycheck Protection Program to keep employees on payroll or rehire those they've recently laid off."

The Caring for Startup Employees Act of 2020 would bar startups from using money they received under the new waiver to pay their investors.

Since the PPP launched in March, the Department of the Treasury and Small Business Administration have issued a stream of sometimes confusing guidelines for who can seek the money; the loan is forgivable if certain criteria is met. Some of the rules deterred startups from applying for loans — and even prompted a wave of startups to retract applications. A number of startups have asked to change investors' voting and control terms to make them eligible for the grants.

In a report last month, the National Venture Capital Association predicted that startups will continue to do mass layoffs, with up to 80% cutting between 10% and 50% percent of employees over the next few months. The group says roughly 300 U.S. startups have laid off more than 30,000 employees.

"Startups and small businesses are the engines of our economy, but right now, they are being hit hard through no fault of their own," McMorris Rodgers said in a statement. "In order to support American ingenuity, we need to ensure these startups can weather this storm so they can continue to grow, innovate, and enrich our communities."

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who has continuously called for a startup-friendly fix to the PPP, is expected to unveil the Democrats' proposal for the next COVID-19 economic stimulus package later this week. Pelosi's office did not immediately respond to an inquiry about whether the package will include a fix to the PPP for startups.

 Emily Birnbaum

Emily Birnbaum ( @birnbaum_e) is a tech policy reporter with Protocol. Her coverage focuses on the U.S. government's attempts to regulate one of the most powerful industries in the world, with a focus on antitrust, privacy and politics. Previously, she worked as a tech policy reporter with The Hill after spending several months as a breaking news reporter. She is a Bethesda, Maryland native and proud Kenyon College alumna.

coronavirus covid-19 sba ppp startups anna eshoo cathy mcmorris rodgers
Protocol | Workplace

Instacart workers are on strike. How far can it get them?

Instacart activists want a nationwide strike to start today, but many workers are too afraid of the company and feel they can't afford a day off of work.

Gig workers protest in front of an Amazon facility in 2020.

Photo: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Starting today, an Instacart organizing group is asking the app's gig workers to go on a nationwide strike to demand better payment structures, benefits and other changes to the way the company treats its workers — but if past strikes are any indication, most Instacart users probably won't even notice.

The majority of Instacart workers on forums like Reddit and Facebook appear either unaware of the planned strike or don't plan to participate because they are skeptical of its power, afraid of retaliation from the company or are too reliant on what they do make from the app to be able to afford to take even one day off of the platform. "Not unless someone is going to pay my bills," "It will never work, you will never be able to get every shopper to organize" and "Last time there was a 'strike' Instacart took away our quality bonus pay," are just a few of the comments Instacart shoppers have left in response to news of the strike.

Keep Reading Show less
Anna Kramer

Anna Kramer is a reporter at Protocol (Twitter: @ anna_c_kramer, email: akramer@protocol.com), where she writes about labor and workplace issues. Prior to joining the team, she covered tech and small business for the San Francisco Chronicle and privacy for Bloomberg Law. She is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she studied International Relations and Arabic and wrote her senior thesis about surveillance tools and technological development in the Middle East.

gig work instacart unionization
sponsored content
Sponsored Content

From Home to Hybrid: Asana’s COO Shares Back-to-Office Advice on Productivity

The way we work has fundamentally changed. COVID-19 upended business dealings and office work processes, putting into hyperdrive a move towards digital collaboration platforms that allow teams to streamline processes and communicate from anywhere. According to the International Data Corporation, the revenue for worldwide collaboration applications increased 32.9 percent from 2019 to 2020, reaching $22.6 billion; it's expected to become a $50.7 billion industry by 2025.

"While consumers and early adopter businesses had widely embraced collaborative applications prior to the pandemic, the market saw five years' worth of new users in the first six months of 2020," said Wayne Kurtzman, research director of social and collaboration at IDC. "This has cemented collaboration, at least to some extent, for every business, large and small."

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Silver

Kate Silver is an award-winning reporter and editor with 15-plus years of journalism experience. Based in Chicago, she specializes in feature and business reporting. Kate's reporting has appeared in the Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Atlantic's CityLab, Atlas Obscura, The Telegraph and many other outlets.

sponsored content sponsored
privacy
Protocol | China

WeChat promises to stop accessing users’ photo albums amid public outcry

A tech blogger claimed that popular Chinese apps snoop around users' photo libraries, provoking heightened public concerns over privacy.

A survey launched by Sina Tech shows 94% of the some 30,000 responding users said they are not comfortable with apps reading their photo libraries just to allow them to share images faster in chats.

Photo: S3studio via Getty Images

A Chinese tech blogger dropped a bombshell last Friday, claiming on Chinese media that he found that several popular Chinese apps, including the Tencent-owned chat apps WeChat and QQ, as well as the Alibaba-owned ecommerce app Taobao, frequently access iPhone users' photo albums in the background even when those apps are not in use.

The original Weibo post from the tech blogger, using the handle of @Hackl0us, provoked intense debates about user privacy on the Chinese internet and consequently prompted WeChat to announce that it would stop fetching users' photo album data in the background.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu is a reporter with Protocol | China. Her writing has appeared in Foreign Policy, The New York Times and POLITICO, among other publications. She can be reached at shenlu@protocol.com.

wechat taobao personal information protection law privacy
Protocol | Enterprise

As businesses struggle with data, enterprise tech is cleaning up

Enterprise tech's vision of "big data" largely fell flat inside silos. But now, an army of providers think they've figured out the problems. And customers and investors are taking note.

Corporate data tends to settle in silos that makes it harder to understand the bigger picture. Enterprise tech vendors smell a lucrative opportunity.

Photo: Jim Witkowski/Unsplash

Data isn't the new oil; it's the new gold. And in any gold rush, the ones who make the most money in the long run are the tool makers and suppliers.

Enterprise tech vendors have long peddled a vision of corporate America centered around so-called "big data." But there was a big problem: Many of those projects failed to produce a return. An army of new providers think they've finally figured out the problem, and investors and customers are taking note.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a senior reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software, including industry giants like Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle. He previously covered emerging technology for Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

alation alibaba aws fivetran google cloud matillion microsoft oracle pure storage salesforce snowflake talend vast data
Protocol | Policy

What Frances Haugen’s SEC complaint means for the rest of tech

Haugen argues Facebook misled investors by failing to disclose its platforms' harms. If the SEC bites, the rest of tech could be next.

The question is whether the SEC will find the contents of Haugen's complaint relevant to investors' interests.

Photo: Matt McClain-Pool/Getty Images

Whistleblowers like former Facebook staffer Frances Haugen have pretty limited options when it comes to actually seeking redress for the harms they've observed and documented. There's no federal privacy law in the U.S. to speak of, Section 230 protects platforms for online speech and companies like Facebook are under no obligation to share any information with lawmakers, or anyone else, about what's happening on their sites.

But there is one agency that not only governs all publicly-traded companies, including in tech, but also offers whistleblowers like Haugen the opportunity for a payout: the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

facebook facebook files frances haugen sec
Latest Stories