Power

Inside supercomputing's race to find coronavirus treatments and cures

Amazon Web Services says it has taken on 11 projects within the White House-led consortium, offering cloud computing to groups of researchers across continents.

Livermore lab

Supercomputers, like this one at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, are being enlisted in the hunt for coronavirus treatments.

Photo: Laura A. Oda/Digital First Media/The Mercury News via Getty Images

At one of his daily press briefings in March, President Trump announced a unique project, a combined effort by government and private industry to accelerate COVID-19 research through the use of supercomputing.

Seven weeks later, the High Performance Computing Consortium, spearheaded by the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy, the Department of Energy and IBM, is up and running, with 55 active projects and 95 research proposals submitted. The effort has brought longtime rivals including Amazon, Microsoft, Google and IBM together with dozens of researchers around the world, all working to fight the virus using complicated algorithms and enormous amounts of data.

So far, the consortium has grown to 38 members and encapsulates 437 petaflops of computing power, said Paul Dabbar, the under secretary for science at the Department of Energy, in a webinar this week. It's a dramatic example of broad efforts by scientists and technologists to bring an array of skills to the pandemic response, providing software platforms and advanced hardware to aid and accelerate drug and vaccine studies.

"The White House applauds the important research being done by our partners in the COVID-19 HPC Consortium," U.S. Chief Technology Officer Michael Kratsios said in a statement Wednesday. "We look forward to continued progress."

The companies involved have offered few details about which projects they're supporting in particular and how their services are being used. But Amazon Web Services told Protocol this week it has taken on 11 projects so far, offering cloud computing resources to groups of researchers across multiple continents. "We saw an opportunity to bring the benefits of cloud and the things we've built, in particular the scale and elasticity pieces of what we do, to bear for the race for treatments, vaccine and research," said Dave Levy, vice president of federal business for AWS.

One group of 12 MIT researchers is using machine learning in AWS to design copies of a protein that could "sop up" the virus, said Kevin Esvelt, an assistant professor at the university. His team feeds vast amounts of data into a model that predicts which variants of a protein, sACE2, could help inhibit COVID-19. "We require all of that computing power in order to simulate this incredibly vast landscape of possible sACE2 proteins," he said, adding there was "no way" they could do it without the technology.

A group of four researchers at Children's National Hospital in Washington, D.C., is combining hundreds of data sets to identify genes that could potentially be targeted to treat COVID-19. Wei Li, a principal investigator and assistant professor focused on genetic medicine at the Children's National Research Institute, the hospital's academic arm, said initial analysis of 30 data sets helped them identify some genes that "appear to disrupt the virus infection."

AWS servers are also helping to power "Project Moonshot," an open-source drug discovery effort from a machine learning company called PostEra, which was launched six months ago by startup accelerator Y Combinator. "We're continuing to iterate to get to an antiviral as fast as possible," said Aaron Morris, PostEra's co-founder and CEO.

AWS allotted each research team a number of "credits" that allow them to use the cloud for free. Morris said his team speaks to dedicated AWS solution architects two or three times per week, parsing technical questions.

Overall, as of Monday, the consortium included at least 16 projects on the science of COVID-19, eight focused on how patients are handling it, and 26 on the cure, mitigation, diagnosis or treatment of the disease.

The initiative is run by a committee of industry representatives, government officials and scientific experts who process and approve applications from researchers, often within days. If an application is approved, the committee pairs the researchers with a company that can help.

"Think of it as speed-dating," Levy said. Beyond that point, he said, the White House hasn't gotten directly involved: "The consortium meets regularly and [members provide] progress updates, but there's no involvement in the work being done by the researchers."

Some officials have marveled that cutthroat tech rivals are working side-by-side. Microsoft and Amazon, for instance, remain in an ugly battle over a $10 billion Pentagon cloud computing contract. The effort involves "would-be competitors working alongside each other during this crisis to move the needle forward," Kratsios said.

Aside from AWS, it's unclear how many projects each company has helped launch. Google, Microsoft and IBM declined to provide figures.

However, Google said it is working on epidemiological modeling with Northeastern University researchers and applying deep learning to medical imaging with the Complutense University of Madrid. IBM said there are "a number of projects running on IBM and IBM-built systems that include such topics as finding new therapeutics and effective coronavirus drugs."

"The whole point of the consortium is to drive collaboration and support COVID-19 research efforts," an IBM spokesperson wrote in an email. "It's not a competition between system providers. The focus is simply to fight the virus."

The consortium is seeking more members as it plans to expand, particularly companies on the hardware side. "We'd like to see more industry participation in the process," said Jim Brase, deputy associate director at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. "That's one of the things we'd like to get help with."

Correction: The name of the supercomputing effort is the High Performance Computing Consortium. This story was updated on May 21, 2020.

Climate

A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Policy

The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Enterprise

Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well-established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins