6 policy proposals from Andreessen Horowitz for the future of crypto

"Web3 isn't just a new wave of innovation. It's an opportunity for a reset."


A16z says Web 3, as crypto is referred to, is "an opportunity for a reset."

Image: Protocol

Calling crypto the third wave of the Web revolution, Andreessen Horowitz outlined Wednesday what it thinks policymakers should do to adapt to the fast growing technology trend.

The Silicon Valley venture firm's policy proposal turns the spotlight on a fresh wave of disruptive technologies, including blockchain, cryptocurrencies and NFTs, which have drawn intense scrutiny from regulators and policy makers.

Those debates are raging amid heightened criticism of Big Tech, triggered by growing concerns over privacy and misinformation on social media platforms, referred to as Web 2.0.

"Few would debate that Web 2.0 — social media and today's large tech platforms — took a wrong turn along the way," the 35-page paper, titled "How to Win the Future: An Agenda for the Third Generation of the Internet," argued.

Web3, as crypto and other blockchain technologies are often referred to, offers a new approach to reshape the web and the tech industry, the a16z paper said. The VC firm has more than $3 billion under management across three funds focused on crypto companies.

"Web3 isn't just a new wave of innovation," the paper said. "It's an opportunity for a reset."

Here are six key takeaways from the a16z crypto proposals:

Policymakers have an important role to play.

Crypto grew rapidly based on decentralized networks. But government must now play a role in defining the way forward. "Policymakers should be leading the conversation and setting a broad vision for the future of U.S. digital infrastructure, not merely reacting to private sector and international developments such as China's digital renminbi," the a16z paper said.

"Leaders in the United States have two options: assume the responsibility of shepherding web3 innovation in a manner that's consistent with the country's values, or cede this role to others with a different, divergent set of priorities."

It's time to rethink the SEC.

The Securities and Exchange Commission, especially under new chair Gary Gensler, has played an increasingly high-profile role in scrutinizing the crypto industry. That's probably not going to work, the paper argues.

"It is time to look beyond the SEC as a catch-all regulator, establish cross-agency groups where appropriate, and consider whether a tailored and comprehensive approach to the regulation of digital infrastructure may be needed."

Disclosure rules need to be changed for the 21st century.

Regulations on disclosures helped create "efficient, safe capital markets" in the 20th century. But many of these rules are "not well designed to address" the way crypto and Web3 platforms work, according to the paper. "A Web3 platform could, for instance, generate financials and operating reports hourly instead of quarterly. New disclosure standards that focus on consumer understanding rather than strict technical adherence to legacy rules could take advantage of such capabilities."

The IRS should work with the crypto industry on new taxation rules.

The proposed infrastructure bill featured a heated debate over how crypto traders and miners should be taxed. And the a16z paper also complained that "the IRS has been slow to give consumers and businesses the basic guidance they need to comply with tax reporting obligations." The a16z paper said "policymakers should push the IRS to collaborate with the sector to implement solutions that leverage the technological leap forward offered by Web3."

Don't get fixated on crypto energy consumption.

Crypto skeptics and critics point to the massive energy consumption involved in bitcoin mining to highlight the industry's impact on the environment. But most Web3 projects use energy-efficient protocols, the a16z said. "Rather than fixating on bitcoin's energy consumption as an excuse to dismiss the potential of the whole industry, policymakers should embrace the value of web3 platforms to support sustainability objectives."

Don't dismiss stablecoins -- embrace them.

SEC Chair Gary Gensler recently compared stablecoins to poker chips. That's a mistake, according to the a16z viewpoint.

Policymakers "should embrace responsibly regulated stablecoins," the paper said. In fact, the U.S. can build on "the existing, thriving ecosystem of private USD-denominated stablecoins" to prevail in what it sees as "the emerging geopolitical arms race in financial innovation." China is a key rival in this competition. The U.S. "should condemn the surveillance authoritarianism embodied in China's digital renminbi project—not attempt to imitate it."

The Twitter account Elon Musk would pay to delete

‘I’ve put a lot of work into it, and $5k is just really not enough.’

Elon Musk considers the Twitter account a security risk.

Photoillustration: Brendan Smialowski/AFP and Getty Images Plus; Protocol

“Can you take this down? It is a security risk.”

That’s how Elon Musk opened a conversation with 19-year-old Jack Sweeney over Twitter DM last fall. He was referencing a Twitter account, called @ElonJet, which tracks the movements of his private jet around the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol, covering breaking news. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

COVID-19 accelerated what many CEOs and CTOs have struggled to do for the past decade: It forced organizations to be agile and adjust quickly to change. For all the talk about digital transformation over the past decade, when push came to shove, many organizations realized they had made far less progress than they thought.

Now with the genie of rapid change out of the bottle, we will never go back to accepting slow and steady progress from our organizations. To survive and thrive in times of disruption, you need to build a resilient, adaptable business with systems and processes that will keep you nimble for years to come. An essential part of business agility is responding to change by quickly developing new applications and adapting old ones. IT faces an unprecedented demand for new applications. According to IDC, by 2023, more than 500 million digital applications and services will be developed and deployed — the same number of apps that were developed in the last 40 years.[1]

Keep Reading Show less
Denise Broady, CMO, Appian
Denise oversees the Marketing and Communications organization where she is responsible for accelerating the marketing strategy and brand recognition across the globe. Denise has over 24+ years of experience as a change agent scaling businesses from startups, turnarounds and complex software companies. Prior to Appian, Denise worked at SAP, WorkForce Software, TopTier and Clarkston Group. She is also a two-time published author of “GRC for Dummies” and “Driven to Perform.” Denise holds a double degree in marketing and production and operations from Virginia Tech.

In the metaverse, anyone can rock a Luigi mustache. Or be a rock.

Akash Nigam on the downsides of realistic avatars, self-expression and the metaverse’s booming fashion business.

Genies has made avatars for some A-list celebrities, but it wants everyone to have one.

Image: Genies

Who will you be in the metaverse? It’s both a surprisingly philosophical question and a potentially critical one for businesses everywhere, as they continue to design what virtual worlds look like and how we live inside of them.

Akash Nigam has been working on his answers for a while. As CEO of Genies, he’s worked with celebrities like Justin Bieber and Rihanna to create digital avatars they can use for album releases, commercial shoots and to generally be places they can’t physically go. Now, Genies is working on something much bigger: an open, decentralized avatar system that lets anyone build their own metaverse character, and then build a world around it.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Intel must spend $100B in Ohio now to avoid spending more later

Forget the politics. Here’s why Intel’s new factories in Ohio are crucial to the company’s future and its hope of regaining the chip manufacturing leadership spot.

Intel is doubling down on its own contract manufacturing business for fabless chipmakers.

Photo: Walden Kirsch/Intel Corporation

Intel’s plans to invest up to $100 billion in a new group of chip factories outside Columbus, Ohio, will have a much greater impact on the future of its manufacturing division compared to any short-term political or supply-chain concerns it might solve.

To hear President Joe Biden, U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and Ohio Governor Mike DeWine tell it, the new factories — known as fabs in this world — are going to help fix inflation, make the U.S. more competitive, drive down the soaring cost of cars, ease the chip supply-chain shocks and improve U.S. national security. That’s a lot, even for one of the biggest projects in Intel’s storied history. It will be years before that capacity comes online, and whether a new chip factory in Ohio could actually solve any or all of those issues is debatable.

Keep Reading Show less
Max A. Cherney

Max A. Cherney is a Technology Reporter at Protocol covering the semiconductor industry. He has worked for Barron's magazine as a Technology Reporter, and its sister site MarketWatch. He is based in San Francisco.


The FTC's antitrust case against Meta could be great for privacy

When the FTC filed its antitrust case against Meta, many traditional competition lawyers said it couldn’t include privacy issues. The agency didn’t listen. Now, it’s winning.

The FTC may have found a surprising lever to get a handle on Big Tech’s data practices.

Photo: bpperry/Getty Images

Right after Thanksgiving in 2011, the Federal Trade Commission announced it had caught Facebook in several lies about privacy occurring over the prior two years. The company, it said, had agreed to a settlement and would be making changes going forward to protect users’ data.

The agreement, to put it mildly, doesn’t seem to have gone as the FTC planned. One $5 billion fine for privacy abuses and an unending stream of scandals later, the FTC is in the middle of litigation with the company now known as Meta over alleged antitrust violations, which were long thought to belong to an entirely separate area of law.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories