Earnings

Alphabet earnings: A rocky road ahead

Alphabet earnings: A rocky road ahead
Alphabet
  • Q1 revenue: $41.2 billion (+13% YoY, -11% QoQ, vs. $40.3 billion expected)
  • Q1 earnings: $6.83 billion (+2.7% YoY, +/-36% QoQ, below expectations)
  • Q2 guidance: Alphabet is "optimistic" about the long-term growth of the business, but the second quarter will be "a difficult one," according to CFO Ruth Porat.

The big number: With the pandemic shutting down industries around the world, the writing has been on the wall that Google was likely going to take a hit in its advertising revenue — far and away its biggest business — as far fewer people are advertising right now. Even still, Alphabet managed to beat revenue expectations by nearly $1 billion. Google's advertising revenue was up over 10% to $33.7 billion over the $30.6 billion it posted in the same period last year. Alphabet's CFO Ruth Porat suggested on the call with analysts that much of the advertising revenue for the quarter came before the West went into lockdown near the end of March, when attentions turned to "less commercial" interests — presumably all of us Googling COVID-19 symptoms.

People are talking: "Performance was strong during the first two months of the quarter, but then in March we experienced a significant slowdown in ad revenues," Porat said in a statement. "We are sharpening our focus on executing more efficiently, while continuing to invest in our long-term opportunities."

Opportunities: Alphabet isn't entirely about advertising. There have been a few other promising, if relatively small, areas of growth in recent quarters, including Google's hardware division and its cloud services businesses. It started breaking out its Google Cloud revenue at the end of 2019, and it posted $2.78 billion in revenue for the quarter, a massive 52% jump over the $1.825 billion it posted in the quarter a year earlier. As more companies consider the value of flexible, cloud-based architectures, it's likely this business will continue to contribute to Alphabet's bottom line. CEO Sundar Pichai said the company would be "recalibrating" its investment focus in data centers given the pandemic.

Google's whole "other revenues" line, which includes sales of Pixel phones, Nest smart devices and other hardware products, as well as cloud, also jumped over last year, contributing $4.44 billion — though if you take out the revenue from cloud services, the segment actually shrunk by about 8%. It seems like fewer people want new phones or smart-home products when they're stuck at home, and Pichai said that fewer devices had been activated in the quarter.

Threats: Google is likely going to be seen as the canary in the coal mine for the advertising industry during the pandemic; its main competitor, Facebook, reports Wednesday. For now, it seems that Google managed to weather the start of the pandemic with revenue that came in before things really went south. The company recently cut its own marketing budgets, with Pichai hinting at hiring freezes on the call as well. Advertising revenue is Alphabet's cash cow — what will it do if no one wants to buy ads?

"There's still a great deal of uncertainty about the path to recovery," Pichai said on the company's call with investors. "Q1 was clearly the tale of two quarters."

The power struggle: Beyond the softness in the advertising industry, Alphabet has another millstone around its neck: everything other than Google. All of its other companies — which it groups together in its earnings as "Other Bets," and includes things like Waymo, Loon, Verily, X and Wing — may one day produce technology that'll revolutionize the world like Google has, but for now, are primarily a massive cash pit for Alphabet. Other Bets generated $135 million in revenue for the quarter (a 20% drop over a year ago), at a loss of $1.12 billion for the quarter. That's about 30% more than it lost in the same quarter a year ago. If Google is facing lean times ahead in its advertising business, how much money is Alphabet going to continue to want to throw into its Other Bets?
Fintech

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Enterprise

Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Policy

The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

A 'Soho house for techies': VCs place a bet on community

Contrary is the latest venture firm to experiment with building community spaces instead of offices.

Contrary NYC is meant to re-create being part of a members-only club where engineers and entrepreneurs can hang out together, have a space to work, and host events for people in tech.

Photo: Courtesy of Contrary

In the pre-pandemic times, Contrary’s network of venture scouts, founders, and top technologists reflected the magnetic pull Silicon Valley had on the tech industry. About 80% were based in the Bay Area, with a smattering living elsewhere. Today, when Contrary asked where people in its network were living, the split had changed with 40% in the Bay Area and another 40% living in or planning to move to New York.

It’s totally bifurcated now, said Contrary’s founder Eric Tarczynski.

Keep Reading Show less
Biz Carson

Biz Carson ( @bizcarson) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol, covering Silicon Valley with a focus on startups and venture capital. Previously, she reported for Forbes and was co-editor of Forbes Next Billion-Dollar Startups list. Before that, she worked for Business Insider, Gigaom, and Wired and started her career as a newspaper designer for Gannett.

Latest Stories
Bulletins