People

Tesla workers plan protest — and push Elon Musk to say Black lives matter

Interviews and internal communications show growing frustration with the outspoken CEO's relative silence on police reform and racial justice.

Tesla workers plan protest — and push Elon Musk to say Black lives matter

Tesla employees are calling on CEO Elon Musk to make a statement about the Black Lives Matter movement.

Photo: Yasin Ozturk/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

Workers at Tesla's Fremont factory are planning a protest for racial justice on Friday, as employees at the company's corporate headquarters call on CEO Elon Musk to make a formal statement in support of Black Lives Matter.

On June 1, following the killing of George Floyd in Minnesota by a white police officer, Musk did tweet about the issue, writing in a reply, "Definitely not right that the other officers were charged with nothing. What message does this send in general to officers who stand by while another does wrong? #JusticeForGeorge." And he replied to a Chris Rock clip about the absurdity of calling cops "bad apples" with the words, "Well said."

But Tesla's employees say that's not enough. According to internal communications reviewed by Protocol and interviews with two Tesla employees who asked to remain anonymous, Musk has yet to issue any kind of message to his staff expressing solidarity with people protesting police brutality across the country or with Tesla's Black employees.

"We want a statement from the CEO condemning racism. We can't even get that," one Tesla employee who belongs to an employee resource group for people of color told Protocol. Earlier this month, the employee said, members of these groups held a call with the company's head of North American human resources, Valerie Workman, but have yet to receive a response from Musk. Leaders of employee resource groups have also sent a list of proposals to the company's head of diversity and inclusion, Kristen Kavanaugh, which includes a call for "direct action" from white executives, including Musk.

"We can't even get a statement saying racism is not tolerated," the employee said of Musk. "That silence is a silent consent."

Tesla representatives did not respond to Protocol's requests for comment.

Internal communications reviewed by Protocol show that in the weeks since Floyd's murder, as protests across the country have grown, Tesla workers have been speaking out internally about their frustration with the lack of input from Musk.

"Has he said ANYTHING AT ALL?" one message reads.

"All I've gotten from him are emails regarding SpaceX, the production of the Y series etc.," read a reply. "Not looking for a change the world speech but to know your CEO appreciates the […] immensely diverse company he has created during this time period would be reassuring."

"The level of silence on this matter from the CEO is deafening," wrote another.

One of the organizers of the factory protest told Protocol they also had not received any word from Musk. "We think it's disappointing that he hasn't made a statement about it," the worker said. "We want to know that he at least cares about us. We want actual support, not [a] statement that he could post online to make himself look good. If he really cared, he'll show up at our protest."

The factory workers have been promoting their event on Twitter as a march for justice to commemorate Juneteenth and plan to march from the factory to City Hall. In addition to concerns about Musk and Tesla, the protesters plan to raise issues with Fremont Mayor Lily Mei, who pushed for the factory to reopen while stay-at-home orders were in place in Alameda County. The organizers have booked speakers, including Anna Watson, a physician's assistant who blew the whistle on what she described as unsafe practices at Tesla's onsite medical clinic.

"It's bigger than Tesla or [Mei] or any other company," the protest organizers wrote in a statement. "It's about changing the world and the way we see it."

Workman did send a message to all of Tesla's U.S. employees shortly after the protests began. In the message, which Workman shared on LinkedIn, she wrote about the challenges of being Black in America and at work. "Fearing for the lives of my husband and sons is a constant nagging undercurrent that I suppress so that I can go about my day (just as my mother, my grandmother and my great-grandmother learned to live with this fact of life)," Workman wrote. "Despite being a proponent of bringing your whole self to work, I never discuss this part of my life in the office."

In her email to the staff, Workman wrote, "Please know that Elon, myself and the entire Tesla leadership team fully support you in bringing your whole self to work."

On the call with Tesla's employee resource group members, the Tesla employee who spoke to Protocol said Workman reiterated Musk's support. Musk, however, wasn't on the call.

Workman also forwarded employees a note from Kavanaugh, who said Tesla would begin a series called "listen to understand," which would encourage employees to "come together, listen to our colleagues' stories, share learning resources, and help us all better understand new perspectives." Kavanaugh wrote that the company was committed to connecting workers through the employee resource groups.

Internal communications show that Tesla's employee resource groups, including Black At Tesla, have served as spaces for Black employees to share their past experiences and support one another over the last few painful weeks. But the corporate employee who spoke with Protocol said it's challenging to connect the many Black factory workers at Tesla to these resources, in part, because of non-solicitation rules Tesla has in place.

According to a version of the policy reviewed by Protocol, Tesla employees are prohibited from distributing literature during working time or in working areas. That includes any time employees are expected to be working, except for rests, meals and breaks.

But, the employee said, those are the workers who arguably need these resources the most. Tesla has been the subject of several lawsuits alleging racial discrimination in its factories. In at least three cases, Tesla has moved to force the plaintiffs into arbitration.

"A lot of the employees most vulnerable aren't even plugged into the employee resource groups, because they're not aware they exist," the employee said.

Indeed, the protest organizer Protocol spoke with had never heard of Black At Tesla.

Power

How the creators of Spligate built gaming’s newest unicorn

1047 Games is now valued at $1.5 billion after three rounds of funding since May.

1047 Games' Splitgate amassed 13 million downloads when its beta launched in July.

Image: 1047 Games

The creators of Splitgate had a problem. Their new free-to-play video game, a take on the legendary arena shooter Halo with a teleportation twist borrowed from Valve's Portal, was gaining steam during its open beta period in July. But it was happening too quickly.

Splitgate was growing so fast and unexpectedly that the entire game was starting to break, as the servers supporting the game began to, figuratively speaking, melt down. The game went from fewer than 1,000 people playing it at any given moment in time to suddenly having tens of thousands of concurrent players. Then it grew to hundreds of thousands of players, all trying to log in and play at once across PlayStation, Xbox and PC.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt
Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.

While it's easy to get lost in the operational and technical side of a transaction, it's important to remember the third component of a payment. That is, the human behind the screen.

Over the last two years, many retailers have seen the benefit of investing in new, flexible payments. Ones that reflect the changing lifestyles of younger spenders, who are increasingly holding onto their cash — despite reports to the contrary. This means it's more important than ever for merchants to take note of the latest payment innovations so they can tap into the savings of the COVID-19 generation.

Keep Reading Show less
Antoine Nougue,Checkout.com

Antoine Nougue is Head of Europe at Checkout.com. He works with ambitious enterprise businesses to help them scale and grow their operations through payment processing services. He is responsible for leading the European sales, customer success, engineering & implementation teams and is based out of London, U.K.

Protocol | Policy

Why Twitch’s 'hate raid' lawsuit isn’t just about Twitch

When is it OK for tech companies to unmask their anonymous users? And when should a violation of terms of service get someone sued?

The case Twitch is bringing against two hate raiders is hardly black and white.

Photo: Caspar Camille Rubin/Unsplash

It isn't hard to figure out who the bad guys are in Twitch's latest lawsuit against two of its users. On one side are two anonymous "hate raiders" who have been allegedly bombarding the gaming platform with abhorrent attacks on Black and LGBTQ+ users, using armies of bots to do it. On the other side is Twitch, a company that, for all the lumps it's taken for ignoring harassment on its platform, is finally standing up to protect its users against persistent violators whom it's been unable to stop any other way.

But the case Twitch is bringing against these hate raiders is hardly black and white. For starters, the plaintiff here isn't an aggrieved user suing another user for defamation on the platform. The plaintiff is the platform itself. Complicating matters more is the fact that, according to a spokesperson, at least part of Twitch's goal in the case is to "shed light on the identity of the individuals behind these attacks," raising complicated questions about when tech companies should be able to use the courts to unmask their own anonymous users and, just as critically, when they should be able to actually sue them for violating their speech policies.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Protocol | Workplace

Remote work is here to stay. Here are the cybersecurity risks.

Phishing and ransomware are on the rise. Is your remote workforce prepared?

Before your company institutes work-from-home-forever plans, you need to ensure that your workforce is prepared to face the cybersecurity implications of long-term remote work.

Photo: Stefan Wermuth/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The delta variant continues to dash or delay return-to-work plans, but before your company institutes work-from-home-forever plans, you need to ensure that your workforce is prepared to face the cybersecurity implications of long-term remote work.

So far in 2021, CrowdStrike has already observed over 1,400 "big game hunting" ransomware incidents and $180 million in ransom demands averaging over $5 million each. That's due in part to the "expanded attack surface that work-from-home creates," according to CTO Michael Sentonas.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma
Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.
Protocol | Fintech

When COVID rocked the insurance market, this startup saw opportunity

Ethos has outraised and outmarketed the competition in selling life insurance directly online — but there's still an $887 billion industry to transform.

Life insurance has been slow to change.

Image: courtneyk/Getty Images

Peter Colis cited a striking statistic that he said led him to launch a life insurance startup: One in twenty children will lose a parent before they turn 15.

"No one ever thinks that will happen to them, but that's the statistics," the co-CEO and co-founder of Ethos told Protocol. "If it's a breadwinning parent, the majority of those families will go bankrupt immediately, within three months. Life insurance elegantly solves this problem."

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

Latest Stories