A Theranos lab worker says blood tests were like ‘flipping a coin’

The testimony from whistleblower Erika Cheung could form a crucial piece of the prosecutors' fraud case against former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes.

The former Theranos headquarters in Palo Alto.

The former Theranos headquarters in Palo Alto.

Photo: Andrej Sokolow via Getty Images

Did Theranos' blood-testing technology work? That was the key question prosecutors hammered away at as the fraud trial of former CEO Elizabeth Holmes continued Wednesday in a San Jose courtroom.

The company's proprietary Edison machines routinely failed quality control tests to the point that former lab employee Erika Cheung said she sometimes refused to run patient samples on the devices, she testified in court.

Patients "don't know the fact that behind closed doors we're having all these problems, and they think they're getting correct results," Cheung said. "It was starting to get very, very uncomfortable and very stressful for me working at the company."

Holmes now faces charges of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud against investors and patients who paid directly for their tests. Cheung's testimony for the prosecution laid out the case that Theranos devices failed often and were not accurate compared to traditional blood-testing machines, which could prove crucial to the prosecution's claims that Holmes touted technology she knew didn't work — if they can prove she was aware of the problems.

Cheung eventually left Theranos and is now known as one of the whistleblowers who first sounded the alarm about the company. She is the second witness in the blockbuster case, following testimony from the company's former controller about the company's financials.

In March 2014, 25.6% of quality control runs on Edison devices failed, according to a spreadsheet shown in court. For one of the thyroid tests, the failure rate in quality control runs was 51.3%, according to the data.

"Was March an especially bad month for [quality control] at Theranos?" asked Assistant U.S. Attorney John Bostic.

"No, this was pretty standard," Cheung testified.

Erika Cheung Erika Cheung, a Theranos employee turned whistleblower, speaks at a film-industry event in 2019.Photo: Jeff Kravitz/FilmMagic for HBO/Getty Images

She called the level of failures "immensely concerning," since labs would want to see less than 1% failing. While Theranos did remove machines that were failing control tests from the lab until they were fixed, Cheung said that the level of problems that she found running the tests in the research lab made her concerned about the results patients would ultimately get.

"You would have about the same luck flipping a coin on whether your results were right or wrong," she said, describing her concerns about the thyroid test.

She also testified that the company had a habit of "cherry-picking data" and deleting outlier information. There was no standard for what outlier data was so the company would often delete two out of six in tests, typically when something was wrong, she said.

"There were no rules. There were no protocols," she said. (The defense did show later some of the company's validation reports that did disclose when outliers had been deleted or that contained all data.)

The company also prepared proficiency tests that compared the Edisons' performance to off-the-shelf testing devices. In the test, vitamin D levels measured by the Theranos Edison were three times higher than what the standard devices measured, Cheung said. On a different test, the company re-ran the numbers a second time, she testified. On the off-the-shelf devices, the values stayed the same each time it was run, but on the Theranos devices, it reported new values for the same blood, according to Cheung.

Cheung said she had tried communicating the challenges to many people at the company, including Sunny Balwani, whom she met with directly. Balwani, who is also facing fraud charges related to his time as chief operating officer at Theranos, is set for a separate trial in January. Cheung said Balwani seemed irritated by her discussing it and told her she should just run the tests.

She also had dinner with George Shultz, a Theranos board member and grandfather to Tyler Shultz, one of Cheung's co-workers. Cheung had shared data with Tyler Shultz that supported some of her concerns about the lab quality. Tyler Shultz ended up emailing Holmes with a detailed letter of his concerns about the company, but Cheung said she never contacted Holmes directly herself.

Holmes' defense has tried to distance the CEO from challenges in the lab and show they were the responsibility of a lot of people other than Holmes. In their cross-examination of Cheung, they asked her to explain who reported to whom at Theranos. A frequent question was whether a given Theranos employee had a Ph.D. (a degree neither Holmes nor Cheung have).

Cheung ultimately left Theranos in 2014. She had begun talking to a Wall Street Journal reporter the following year when she noticed a black SUV outside of her new employer. When she left work, a man jumped out of the SUV and hand-delivered a letter from David Boies, Theranos' attorney, warning her against sharing trade secrets and defamation or else it would pursue litigation. Undaunted, Cheung said she called the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which regulates laboratory testing, and ended up filing a letter with the agency outlining her concerns.

Beyond discussing the letter from Boies, Cheung wasn't asked much about her experience as a whistleblower. The judge blocked the prosecution from allowing Cheung to talk about her current job of running a nonprofit called Ethics in Entrepreneurship.

Her testimony will continue on Friday.

See Protocol's in-depth coverage of the Theranos trial for more.

Protocol | Enterprise

Why Segment is central to Twilio’s path to enterprise software stardom

Given Apple's recent changes to third-party tracking technology and Google's looming changes, the customer data platform provider is poised to play a central role in Twilio's product vision moving forward.

The launch of Engage points to the critical role Segment will play in Twilio's future.

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

This week at Twilio's annual conference, it's Segment, the company it acquired last year for $3.2 billion, that's poised to take center stage.

Signal kicks off on Wednesday. Alongside Michelle Obama, one of the highlights of the two-day event is bound to be Twilio Engage, a new product that showcases the combined capabilities of the cloud communications provider and Segment, the customer data platform vendor that Twilio bought last November.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a senior reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software, including industry giants like Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle. He previously covered emerging technology for Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or

The way we work has fundamentally changed. COVID-19 upended business dealings and office work processes, putting into hyperdrive a move towards digital collaboration platforms that allow teams to streamline processes and communicate from anywhere. According to the International Data Corporation, the revenue for worldwide collaboration applications increased 32.9 percent from 2019 to 2020, reaching $22.6 billion; it's expected to become a $50.7 billion industry by 2025.

"While consumers and early adopter businesses had widely embraced collaborative applications prior to the pandemic, the market saw five years' worth of new users in the first six months of 2020," said Wayne Kurtzman, research director of social and collaboration at IDC. "This has cemented collaboration, at least to some extent, for every business, large and small."

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Silver

Kate Silver is an award-winning reporter and editor with 15-plus years of journalism experience. Based in Chicago, she specializes in feature and business reporting. Kate's reporting has appeared in the Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Atlantic's CityLab, Atlas Obscura, The Telegraph and many other outlets.

Protocol | Workplace

The whiteboard wars: Miro and Figma want to make meetings better

Miro and Figma separately launched features on Tuesday aimed at improving collaboration on their platforms.

Whiteboard rivals Miro and Figma each released collaboration improvements.

Logos: Figma and Miro

We expect a lot from our productivity tools these days. You can't just stroll over to your team members' desks and show them what you're working on anymore. Most of those interactions need to happen online, and it's even better if the work and the communication can happen in one place. Miro and Figma — competitors in the collaborative whiteboard space — understand how critical remote collaboration is, and are both working to up their meeting game.

This week, both platforms announced features aimed at improving the collaboration experience, each vying to be the home base for teams to work and hang out together. Figma announced updates to its multiplayer whiteboard FigJam, and Miro announced a new set of tools that it's calling Miro Smart Meetings. Figma's goal is to make FigJam more customizable and accessible for everyone; Miro wants to be the best place for content-centered, professional meetings. They both want to be the go-to hub for teams looking to get stuff done.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at

Protocol | Workplace

Hybrid work is here to stay. Here’s how to do it better.

We've recovered from the COVID-19 digital collaboration whiplash. Now we must build a more intentional model for hybrid work.

This is a call to managers to understand the mundane or unwanted projects their employees face, and what work excites them.

Photo: Adobe

Ashley Still is Adobe's Senior Vice President of Digital Media – Marketing, Strategy & Global Partnerships.

When COVID-19 hit, we were forced into a fully digital mode of business operation. Overnight, we adopted available remote work tools — even if imperfect, they were the best tools for the job.

Keep Reading Show less
Ashley Still
As Senior Vice President, Digital Media – Marketing, Strategy & Global Partnerships, Ashley Still leads product marketing and business development for Adobe's flagship Creative Cloud and Document Cloud offerings. This includes iconic software brands such as Photoshop, Lightroom, Illustrator, InDesign and Acrobat. Her expanded remit now includes Adobe's strategic partnership work with technology companies globally, including Apple, Microsoft and Google; and driving Adobe's fast-growing mobile app business. Her team is also responsible for the demand generation marketing campaigns that makes Adobe the market-leader, across creative and document productivity segments. Previously she was Vice President and General Manager, Adobe Creative Cloud for Enterprise. Here her team delivered an integrated content creation, collaboration and publishing solution that securely enables brands to create exceptional design and content. Prior to this, Ashley was Senior Director of Product & Marketing for Adobe Primetime, an Internet television platform used by Comcast, Turner, NBC Sports and other global media companies to deliver TV content and dynamic advertising to any Internet device. Under Ashley's leadership, Adobe Primetime won an Emmy Award for the Adobe Pass TV-Everywhere service. Ashley joined Adobe in 2004 following her internship with the company and held several product management positions for Adobe Photoshop. Still earned her Bachelor of Arts degree from Yale University and her Masters degree from Stanford Graduate School of Business.
Protocol | Workplace

Meet the productivity app influencers

Within the realm of productivity influencing, there is a somewhat surprising sect: Creators who center their content around a specific productivity app.

People are making content and building courses based off of their favorite productivity apps.

Photos: Courtesy

This is the creators' internet. The rest of us are just living in it. We're accustomed to the scores of comedy TikTokers, beauty YouTubers and lifestyle Instagram influencers gracing our feeds. A significant portion of these creators are productivity gurus, advising their followers on how they organize their lives.

Within the realm of productivity influencing, there's a surprising sect: Creators who center their content around a specific productivity app. They're a powerful part of these apps' ecosystems, drawing users to the platform and offering helpful tips and tricks. Notion in particular has a huge influencer family, with #notion gaining millions of views on TikTok.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at

Latest Stories