Power

Fraud or mistakes? Opening trial arguments debate how much Elizabeth Holmes knew.

"Elizabeth Holmes did not go to work every day intending to lie, cheat and steal," her lawyers argued.

Elizabeth Holmes arriving to court with her defense team.

Holmes has pleaded not guilty to 12 counts of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud.

Photo: Nick Otto/AFP via Getty Images

To the U.S. government, Elizabeth Holmes is a fraudster bent on lying and cheating to get money for her company while deceiving investors and the public on how little its lab work could actually do.

But Holmes' lawyers argue that she isn't a villainous CEO who purposefully deceived everyone. Rather, she's a young Silicon Valley founder who believed so much in her vision and product that she never sold a share and thought that the company's challenges could eventually be overcome.

"Elizabeth Holmes did not go to work every day intending to lie, cheat and steal," said Lance Wade, Holmes' attorney from Washington D.C.-based firm Williams & Connolly. "The government would have you believe her company, her entire life, is a fraud. That is wrong. That is not true."

The opening arguments, which lasted hours, kicked off the start of the high-profile trial of Theranos founder Holmes, who has pleaded not guilty to 12 counts of fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Spectators arrived at the courthouse in the middle of the night to claim one of the three dozen seats available in the courtroom to the public. Holmes' partner, Billy Evans, with whom she had a son in July, was in the courtroom in the first row.

"This is a case about fraud, about lying and cheating to get money. It's a crime on Main Street and it's a crime in Silicon Valley," said assistant U.S. attorney Robert Leach in the prosecution's opening statement.

A theme of the opening statement was how often Holmes found herself "out of time and out of money" with her company on the brink barely able to meet payroll. To gain funding and customers, the government argued that Holmes deceived investors and the public in six main categories: the miniLab device, military, pharmaceuticals, financials, the Walgreens rollout and the accuracy of tests. The government claimed, for example, that in one inaccurate test, a pregnant woman changed her medication after a test told her she was no longer pregnant.

The government also argued that Theranos overstated the device's capabilities to the public and to investors, like Walgreens and Safeway. The company had published a press release in 2013 stating that its blood-testing device could run any test on a few drops of blood, despite it still relying largely on commercial machines and vein draws.

The trial is also likely to analyze the media's role and the statements that Holmes made to journalists, which landed her on the cover of magazines like Forbes and Fortune. Leach asserted that Holmes used big magazine profiles as part of her lure to investors and as a way to deceive the public. "Her deceit of reporters was an important way that she executed her fraud," Leach said. (Ultimately, it was a WSJ report based off of Theranos whistleblowers that contributed to the company's downfall.)

The challenge for the government will be proving that Holmes had an intent to deceive investors and the public. Holmes' lawyers instead argued that she was a true believer and dedicated her life to it. Despite having opportunities to sell and make "hundreds of millions," her attorney Wade said that Holmes had never sold a share of her company so she wasn't even financially benefiting from the alleged fraud.

"Elizabeth Holmes worked herself to the bone for 15 years trying to make lab testing cheaper and more accessible. She poured her heart and her soul into that effort. Now in the end, Theranos failed. And Ms. Holmes walked away with nothing," Wade said at the start of the defense's opening remarks. "But failure is not a crime. Trying your hardest and coming up short is not a crime. And by the time this trial is over you will see that the villain that the government just presented is actually a living, breathing human being who did her very best each and every day."

Wade painted Holmes as a passionate Silicon Valley CEO who dropped out of Stanford at 19 to pursue a life-changing idea. Because of her age, he said, she surrounded herself with people who had the experience she lacked. For example, Holmes was not legally allowed to manage the lab because she didn't have qualifications, so she hired other lab directors to be in charge of the testing. As a result, her defense argued, she shouldn't be held accountable for the lab's problems when it was regulated by a lab director.

The other finger was pointed at Theranos COO Sunny Balwani, who is standing trial separately in early 2022. Wade said the board had encouraged her to hire someone with business experience, so she hired Balwani to oversee operations, which included financial modeling and the lab's operations.

Her lawyer tiptoed around Holmes' relationship with Balwani, who is also her ex-boyfriend. Before the trial started, the defense had said in filings that Holmes was a victim of an abusive relationship, and it was viewed as a potential defense for her in the case. (Balwani denies it.) Wade told the jury that they will "hear that trusting and relying on Mr. Balwani as her primary adviser was one of her mistakes" and claimed that Balwani was known for his hard-charging personality and having a temper.

Her defense also countered the narrative that Theranos had misled Walgreens when it didn't use its own machines in its store, but instead said that it was a phased plan all along. The first phase was supposed to use commercial testing machines before using the company's own, Wade said. But instead Theranos focused on the first phase and lost sight of other parts, another mistake the company made, he pointed out.

"Ms. Holmes made mistakes, but mistakes are not criminal," he said.

In the end, it will be up to the jury to decide whether Holmes intentionally and knowingly defrauded both investors and paying patients or is just a startup CEO who believed she could change the world, but made a series of mistakes as she got caught up in her own company's hype.

Protocol | Policy

Why Twitch’s 'hate raid' lawsuit isn’t just about Twitch

When is it OK for tech companies to unmask their anonymous users? And when should a violation of terms of service get someone sued?

The case Twitch is bringing against two hate raiders is hardly black and white.

Photo: Caspar Camille Rubin/Unsplash

It isn't hard to figure out who the bad guys are in Twitch's latest lawsuit against two of its users. On one side are two anonymous "hate raiders" who have been allegedly bombarding the gaming platform with abhorrent attacks on Black and LGBTQ+ users, using armies of bots to do it. On the other side is Twitch, a company that, for all the lumps it's taken for ignoring harassment on its platform, is finally standing up to protect its users against persistent violators whom it's been unable to stop any other way.

But the case Twitch is bringing against these hate raiders is hardly black and white. For starters, the plaintiff here isn't an aggrieved user suing another user for defamation on the platform. The plaintiff is the platform itself. Complicating matters more is the fact that, according to a spokesperson, at least part of Twitch's goal in the case is to "shed light on the identity of the individuals behind these attacks," raising complicated questions about when tech companies should be able to use the courts to unmask their own anonymous users and, just as critically, when they should be able to actually sue them for violating their speech policies.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

While it's easy to get lost in the operational and technical side of a transaction, it's important to remember the third component of a payment. That is, the human behind the screen.

Over the last two years, many retailers have seen the benefit of investing in new, flexible payments. Ones that reflect the changing lifestyles of younger spenders, who are increasingly holding onto their cash — despite reports to the contrary. This means it's more important than ever for merchants to take note of the latest payment innovations so they can tap into the savings of the COVID-19 generation.

Keep Reading Show less
Antoine Nougue,Checkout.com

Antoine Nougue is Head of Europe at Checkout.com. He works with ambitious enterprise businesses to help them scale and grow their operations through payment processing services. He is responsible for leading the European sales, customer success, engineering & implementation teams and is based out of London, U.K.

Protocol | Fintech

When COVID rocked the insurance market, this startup saw opportunity

Ethos has outraised and outmarketed the competition in selling life insurance directly online — but there's still an $887 billion industry to transform.

Life insurance has been slow to change.

Image: courtneyk/Getty Images

Peter Colis cited a striking statistic that he said led him to launch a life insurance startup: One in twenty children will lose a parent before they turn 15.

"No one ever thinks that will happen to them, but that's the statistics," the co-CEO and co-founder of Ethos told Protocol. "If it's a breadwinning parent, the majority of those families will go bankrupt immediately, within three months. Life insurance elegantly solves this problem."

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

Protocol | Workplace

Remote work is here to stay. Here are the cybersecurity risks.

Phishing and ransomware are on the rise. Is your remote workforce prepared?

Before your company institutes work-from-home-forever plans, you need to ensure that your workforce is prepared to face the cybersecurity implications of long-term remote work.

Photo: Stefan Wermuth/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The delta variant continues to dash or delay return-to-work plans, but before your company institutes work-from-home-forever plans, you need to ensure that your workforce is prepared to face the cybersecurity implications of long-term remote work.

So far in 2021, CrowdStrike has already observed over 1,400 "big game hunting" ransomware incidents and $180 million in ransom demands averaging over $5 million each. That's due in part to the "expanded attack surface that work-from-home creates," according to CTO Michael Sentonas.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma
Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.
Protocol | Enterprise

How GitHub COO Erica Brescia runs the coding gold mines

GitHub sits at the center of the world's software-development activity, which makes the Microsoft-owned code repository a major target for hackers and a trend-setter in open source software.

GitHub COO Erica Brescia

Photo: GitHub

An astonishing amount of the code that runs the world's software spends at least part of its life in GitHub. COO Erica Brescia is responsible for making sure that's not a disaster in the making.

Brescia joined GitHub after selling Bitnami, the open-source software deployment tool she co-founded, to VMware in 2019. She's responsible for all operational aspects of GitHub, which was acquired by Microsoft in 2018 for $7.5 billion in one of its largest deals to date.

Keep Reading Show less
Tom Krazit

Tom Krazit ( @tomkrazit) is Protocol's enterprise editor, covering cloud computing and enterprise technology out of the Pacific Northwest. He has written and edited stories about the technology industry for almost two decades for publications such as IDG, CNET, paidContent, and GeekWire, and served as executive editor of Gigaom and Structure.

Latest Stories