The first 100 days: Tidal COO Lior Tibon on life after the Square acquisition

Tidal's chief operating officer is OK with the company being much smaller than Spotify, but he won't tell us how much smaller it actually is.

​Tidal COO Lior Tibon

Tidal COO Lior Tibon has been with the company for more than six years.

Photo: Tidal

When Square first announced its plans to acquire the music streaming service Tidal in March, executives from both companies promised that we might see the first fruits of their collaboration within the first 100 days. The acquisition closed in late April, or about 100 days ago this week, so we caught up with Tidal COO Lior Tibon for an update.

In his conversation with Protocol, Tibon explains what's new with Tidal, how the acquisition has affected company culture and why he isn't worried about competing against much bigger services like Spotify and Apple Music.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

It's been a little over 100 days since Square's acquisition of Tidal closed. How have things been going since, and what kind of updates can you share on what this means for Tidal's streaming service?

We've done a lot of thinking around how to take the company forward, now that we are owned by Square. First, we've been doing a very aggressive hiring push across all departments.

Secondly, we've been focusing a lot on enhancing the co-listening experience. Very recently, we launched a full lyrics feature globally. Lyrics are now fully integrated in a synchronous manner in the app in dozens of different languages. We also launched a discovery tool that is serving customers with new music and a bunch of other experiences along those lines.

And then thirdly, we have been working very hard on planning into the future. Particularly, how do we make sure that Tidal is serving not only the listener but also the artist community in the best way possible? We are really reinforcing our original mission under Square of being the most artist-centric service out there. That means [we'll add] a lot of new features later this year and next year to strengthen our focus on being artist-centric.

What has changed internally? How has the deal affected company culture?

We benefit a lot from being part of a larger ecosystem. The music streaming space is hyper-competitive, and there are some giant companies out there competing for customers and listeners. We are significantly smaller than all of them. The fact that we are now part of a larger ecosystem of different business units with different expertise [gives us] an opportunity to learn more, and tap into expertise in different parts of the organization. It's been just over three months, but I definitely think we can feel very positive differences in that sense.

Secondly, to the recruitment point and talent point, folks are looking at Tidal with a fresh perspective, helping us to obtain a broader set of talent. [However,] Tidal has always been a very interesting place, where you have a more tech and product culture matched with music and creative. It's very important to not to lose sight of that, so we're definitely not looking to change anything fundamental at Tidal. That's definitely something that Square has been very attentive of.

It's been a couple years since Tidal last announced subscriber numbers. Any chance we may be able to get an update on that, and do you plan to release this type of data more frequently in the future?

No, we're not announcing any specific subscriber metrics to the market. Obviously, Square has certain disclosure obligations, by the virtue of them being a public company. So potentially there will be a few more data points over the next few months and years that would be shared on Tidal. But we don't have any specific plans to announce anything in the near term.

You did say earlier that Tidal was a lot smaller than some of the other services out there. How do you want to compete with Spotify and Apple Music?

There is a lot of opportunity and room for multiple services to exist. We don't look at music streaming as a winner takes all, or ultimately a duopoly or oligopoly market. I think it's a much more diverse marketplace. And I think our own performance has proven that. We're definitely still a small service, but we've been growing in line, or in fact faster than the industry.

But we're not even framing our objectives in the sense of who has more subscribers, or how are we ranked versus some of the other platforms out there. There are some great companies that are doing great things in music streaming that are much bigger than us. We are very comfortable with not playing that game, but [are instead] trying to build the business around a very specific value proposition of being the most artist-centric music streaming service, and cater to the specific audiences that care about that.

We're really known for sound. The reason why we've invested so much in sound over the years is because that's really at the core of the creative process. Now, following the Square acquisition, we're thinking about a lot of other aspects that will enhance the listening experience and the artist-to-fan experience down the road.

When the acquisition was first announced, Jay-Z said that Tidal was about more than just streaming. That made me wonder if Tidal could eventually become more of a complement to streaming services like Spotify?

Without going into the specifics of one step or another, I think directionally that's probably right. We're not looking to just compete on music streaming, and counting the number of subscribers we have. We're looking at creating a more distinct music experience, making new connections between artists and fans.

When will we see that happen?

I don't want to overcommit for timelines, but I can assure you that we are hard at work on a lot of new features that will come into the market in the next few months. Definitely stay tuned for additional news to come.


A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.


Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well-established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories