Source Code: Your daily look at what matters in tech.

source-codesource codeauthorDavid PierceNoneWant your finger on the pulse of everything that's happening in tech? Sign up to get David Pierce's daily newsletter.64fd3cbe9f

Get access to Protocol

Will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

I’m already a subscriber

How Trump’s TikTok ban might actually work — or not

The administration has been trying to get rid of TikTok for months, and now the president said he's going to make it happen. The question is, how?

TikTok logo

What, exactly, would a TikTok ban look like? It's hard to know for sure.

Image: TikTok/David Pierce

President Trump told reporters on Air Force One Friday night that "as far as TikTok is concerned, we're banning them from the United States." Trump also dismissed the idea of letting a U.S. company buy TikTok's U.S. business, as Microsoft is interested in doing. (Microsoft didn't respond to a request for comment.)

What Trump wants, according to a source familiar with the matter, is to ensure that TikTok U.S. becomes an entirely American-owned business. TikTok has talked with other companies about such an acquisition — conversations started around the time of Mike Pompeo's comments earlier this month that the government was "looking at" a ban — but discussions with Microsoft have advance farthest. Trump, this person said, would see a 100% American-owned TikTok as a win for his administration.

On Saturday, Reuters reported that ByteDance is willing to make that happen. It had reportedly hoped to keep a minority stake in TikTok's U.S. business, but is now prepared to divest it completely.

Trump's move is not exactly surprising: It comes after months of posturing and rhetoric, with the Trump administration claiming Huawei, TikTok and other China-owned companies present a national security threat to the United States. TikTok, meanwhile, has desperately tried to outrun that idea. It hired an American CEO, promised to hire 10,000 people in the country, launched the TikTok Transparency Center in Los Angeles, and even offered a thorough explanation of its algorithm. "TikTok has become the latest target, but we are not the enemy," wrote that American CEO, Kevin Mayer, in a blog post this week.

After the news broke on Friday, a TikTok spokesperson said in a statement that "these are the facts: 100 million Americans come to TikTok for entertainment and connection, especially during the pandemic. We've hired nearly 1,000 people to our U.S. team this year alone, and are proud to be hiring another 10,000 employees into great paying jobs across the U.S. Our $1 billion creator fund supports U.S. creators who are building livelihoods from our platform. TikTok U.S. user data is stored in the U.S., with strict controls on employee access. TikTok's biggest investors come from the U.S. We are committed to protecting our users' privacy and safety as we continue working to bring joy to families and meaningful careers to those who create on our platform."

The open question is, can Trump actually do this? There's really no model for an out-and-out ban on an app in the U.S. The closest legal precedent may come from 1995, when the U.S. government attempted to regulate encryption software. The government said encryption was a "munition" and that Daniel Bernstein would need a license to talk about or share his encryption algorithm. Bernstein argued that was an illegal restriction on his speech. In the case, Bernstein v. U.S. Department of Justice, the court ultimately concluded that "the Source Code was speech protected by the First Amendment."

That case was argued for Bernstein by a legal team from the EFF, and the organization believes strongly that it applies now. "There is absolutely no way the United States is going to ban TikTok because of the First Amendment," Eva Galperin, the EFF's director of cybersecurity, told me a few weeks ago. "Code is speech. TikTok is code."

That's not to say Trump doesn't have any moves, though. His case for getting rid of TikTok likely starts with CFIUS, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. The group is made up of a number of government bodies but is run by the Treasury Department. It's the committee that forced Beijing Kunlun Tech to sell Grindr in 2019, and it was widely reported that CFIUS' concerns had to do with the personal data Grindr could have, especially on members of the intelligence community or the military.

CFIUS has reportedly been looking into ByteDance's $1 billion acquisition of, a China-based company with a U.S-based app that was rolled into TikTok and helped kick off the app's worldwide explosion, since last fall. The move was sparked by concerns that TikTok was suppressing certain kinds of political content, and a number of government officials called for a review. That same focus on personal data could also give CFIUS a reason to nix the acquisition.

Typically, CFIUS is not allowed to disclose these investigations, but Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said this week that TikTok was indeed under investigation. "TikTok is under CFIUS review and we'll be making a recommendation to the president on it this week," he said. "So we have lots of alternatives."

The timing checks out. Here's a key bit from CFIUS's most recent report to Congress: "If CFIUS determines that the transaction poses unresolved national security concerns, it will refer the transaction to the president unless the parties choose to abandon the transaction. The president may suspend or prohibit the transaction, including by requiring divestment." The president has 15 days from a CFIUS referral to make a decision, and is required to announce it publicly.

That investigation may give Trump cover to, if not ban TikTok outright, at least push for the unwinding of ByteDance's acquisition of That would, at the very least, massively complicate the company's work going forward. Trump also said he could use an executive order or invoke the International Emergency Powers Act to ban the app, saying "well, I have that authority." Whether he actually does is hard to know, because this would be an unprecedented move.

Then there's the question of what "banning" TikTok might actually look like. Trump could pressure Google and Apple to remove the apps from their app stores, though that wouldn't affect the millions of users who already have TikTok downloaded. TikTok has long said it holds user data both in the U.S. and Singapore, which would make it hard for the U.S. government to unilaterally shut down its operations. Countries like China and India can kick out an app just by blocking its network traffic, but that'd be even harder for the administration to justify.

Whatever happens, the race to corral TikTok users is on. Instagram's Reels, a rough copy of TikTok, has been slowly launching around the world, while Triller has become a favorite landing place for creators. Whether Microsoft buys the app, it gets kicked out of the country altogether, or this all turns out to just be more bluster, the TikTok War is far from over.

Update: This story was updated Aug. 1 to add information about ByteDance's willingness to sell 100% of TikTok U.S.


To combat disinformation, centralize moderation

There's more to content moderation than deplatforming.

In addition to interplatform collaboration, big tech companies would also benefit from greater collaborations with academic researchers, government agencies or other private entities, the authors argue.

Image: Twitter

Yonatan Lupu is an associate professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University. Nicolás Velasquez Hernandez is a lecturer at the Elliott School of International Affairs and a postdoctoral researcher at GW's Institute for Data, Democracy and Politics.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' signing of a bill that penalizes social media companies for deplatforming politicians was yet another salvo in an escalating struggle over the growth and spread of digital disinformation, malicious content and extremist ideology. While Big Tech, world leaders and policymakers — along with many of us in the research community — all recognize the importance of mitigating online and offline harm, agreement on how best to do that is few and far between.

Keep Reading Show less

As President of Alibaba Group, I am often asked, "What is Alibaba doing in the U.S.?"

In fact, most people are not aware we have a business in the U.S. because we are not a U.S. consumer-facing service that people use every day – nor do we want to be. Our consumers – nearly 900 million of them – are located in China.

Keep Reading Show less
J. Michael Evans
Michael Evans leads and executes Alibaba Group's international strategy for globalizing the company and expanding its businesses outside of China.
Protocol | Fintech

Marqeta turns to a fintech outsider

Randy Kern, a Salesforce and Microsoft veteran, is taking a plunge into the payments world.

Randy Kern is joining Marqeta after decades at Microsoft and Salesforce.

Photo: Marqeta

Marqeta has just named a new chief technology officer. And it's an eyebrow-raising choice for a critical post as the payments powerhouse faces new challenges as a public company.

Randy Kern, who joined Marqeta last month, is a tech veteran with decades of engineering and leadership experience, mainly in enterprise software. He worked on Microsoft's Azure and Bing technologies, and then went on to Salesforce where he last served as chief customer technology officer.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

Protocol | Policy

What can’t Jonathan Kanter do?

Biden's nominee to lead the DOJ's antitrust section may face calls to remove himself from issues as weighty as cracking down on Google and Apple.

DOJ antitrust nominee Jonathan Kanter's work as a corporate lawyer may require him to recuse himself from certain cases.

Photo: New America/Flickr

Jonathan Kanter, President Joe Biden's nominee to run the Justice Department's antitrust division, has been a favorite of progressives, competitors to Big Tech companies and even some Republicans due to his longtime criticism of companies like Google.

But his prior work as a corporate lawyer going after tech giants may require him to recuse himself from some of the DOJ's marquee investigations and cases, including those involving Google and Apple.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Protocol | Enterprise

Couchbase plots escape from middle of database pack with $200M IPO

The company has to prove it can beat larger rivals like MongoDB, as well as fast-growing competitors like Redis Labs, not to mention the big cloud companies.

Couchbase celebrates its initial public offering on the Nasdaq market.

Photo: Nasdaq

At first glance, Couchbase appears to be stuck in the middle of the cloud database market, flanked by competitors with more traction and buzz. But fresh off a $200 million IPO Thursday, CEO Matt Cain relished the opportunity ahead to prove why his company can beat out rivals the market considers more valuable.

The NoSQL database provider's public offering helped propel Couchbase to a $1.2 billion valuation. But unlike one of the last big data-related IPOs, market leader Snowflake's historic debut on the public markets last December, Couchbase has some work to do to differentiate itself.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a senior reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software, including industry giants like Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle. He previously covered emerging technology for Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or

Latest Stories