How Trump’s TikTok ban might actually work — or not

The administration has been trying to get rid of TikTok for months, and now the president said he's going to make it happen. The question is, how?

TikTok logo

What, exactly, would a TikTok ban look like? It's hard to know for sure.

Image: TikTok/David Pierce

President Trump told reporters on Air Force One Friday night that "as far as TikTok is concerned, we're banning them from the United States." Trump also dismissed the idea of letting a U.S. company buy TikTok's U.S. business, as Microsoft is interested in doing. (Microsoft didn't respond to a request for comment.)

What Trump wants, according to a source familiar with the matter, is to ensure that TikTok U.S. becomes an entirely American-owned business. TikTok has talked with other companies about such an acquisition — conversations started around the time of Mike Pompeo's comments earlier this month that the government was "looking at" a ban — but discussions with Microsoft have advance farthest. Trump, this person said, would see a 100% American-owned TikTok as a win for his administration.

On Saturday, Reuters reported that ByteDance is willing to make that happen. It had reportedly hoped to keep a minority stake in TikTok's U.S. business, but is now prepared to divest it completely.

Trump's move is not exactly surprising: It comes after months of posturing and rhetoric, with the Trump administration claiming Huawei, TikTok and other China-owned companies present a national security threat to the United States. TikTok, meanwhile, has desperately tried to outrun that idea. It hired an American CEO, promised to hire 10,000 people in the country, launched the TikTok Transparency Center in Los Angeles, and even offered a thorough explanation of its algorithm. "TikTok has become the latest target, but we are not the enemy," wrote that American CEO, Kevin Mayer, in a blog post this week.

After the news broke on Friday, a TikTok spokesperson said in a statement that "these are the facts: 100 million Americans come to TikTok for entertainment and connection, especially during the pandemic. We've hired nearly 1,000 people to our U.S. team this year alone, and are proud to be hiring another 10,000 employees into great paying jobs across the U.S. Our $1 billion creator fund supports U.S. creators who are building livelihoods from our platform. TikTok U.S. user data is stored in the U.S., with strict controls on employee access. TikTok's biggest investors come from the U.S. We are committed to protecting our users' privacy and safety as we continue working to bring joy to families and meaningful careers to those who create on our platform."

The open question is, can Trump actually do this? There's really no model for an out-and-out ban on an app in the U.S. The closest legal precedent may come from 1995, when the U.S. government attempted to regulate encryption software. The government said encryption was a "munition" and that Daniel Bernstein would need a license to talk about or share his encryption algorithm. Bernstein argued that was an illegal restriction on his speech. In the case, Bernstein v. U.S. Department of Justice, the court ultimately concluded that "the Source Code was speech protected by the First Amendment."

That case was argued for Bernstein by a legal team from the EFF, and the organization believes strongly that it applies now. "There is absolutely no way the United States is going to ban TikTok because of the First Amendment," Eva Galperin, the EFF's director of cybersecurity, told me a few weeks ago. "Code is speech. TikTok is code."

That's not to say Trump doesn't have any moves, though. His case for getting rid of TikTok likely starts with CFIUS, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. The group is made up of a number of government bodies but is run by the Treasury Department. It's the committee that forced Beijing Kunlun Tech to sell Grindr in 2019, and it was widely reported that CFIUS' concerns had to do with the personal data Grindr could have, especially on members of the intelligence community or the military.

CFIUS has reportedly been looking into ByteDance's $1 billion acquisition of Musical.ly, a China-based company with a U.S-based app that was rolled into TikTok and helped kick off the app's worldwide explosion, since last fall. The move was sparked by concerns that TikTok was suppressing certain kinds of political content, and a number of government officials called for a review. That same focus on personal data could also give CFIUS a reason to nix the acquisition.

Typically, CFIUS is not allowed to disclose these investigations, but Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said this week that TikTok was indeed under investigation. "TikTok is under CFIUS review and we'll be making a recommendation to the president on it this week," he said. "So we have lots of alternatives."

The timing checks out. Here's a key bit from CFIUS's most recent report to Congress: "If CFIUS determines that the transaction poses unresolved national security concerns, it will refer the transaction to the president unless the parties choose to abandon the transaction. The president may suspend or prohibit the transaction, including by requiring divestment." The president has 15 days from a CFIUS referral to make a decision, and is required to announce it publicly.

That investigation may give Trump cover to, if not ban TikTok outright, at least push for the unwinding of ByteDance's acquisition of Musical.ly. That would, at the very least, massively complicate the company's work going forward. Trump also said he could use an executive order or invoke the International Emergency Powers Act to ban the app, saying "well, I have that authority." Whether he actually does is hard to know, because this would be an unprecedented move.

Then there's the question of what "banning" TikTok might actually look like. Trump could pressure Google and Apple to remove the apps from their app stores, though that wouldn't affect the millions of users who already have TikTok downloaded. TikTok has long said it holds user data both in the U.S. and Singapore, which would make it hard for the U.S. government to unilaterally shut down its operations. Countries like China and India can kick out an app just by blocking its network traffic, but that'd be even harder for the administration to justify.

Whatever happens, the race to corral TikTok users is on. Instagram's Reels, a rough copy of TikTok, has been slowly launching around the world, while Triller has become a favorite landing place for creators. Whether Microsoft buys the app, it gets kicked out of the country altogether, or this all turns out to just be more bluster, the TikTok War is far from over.

Update: This story was updated Aug. 1 to add information about ByteDance's willingness to sell 100% of TikTok U.S.


How I decided to leave the US and pursue a tech career in Europe

Melissa Di Donato moved to Europe to broaden her technology experience with a different market perspective. She planned to stay two years. Seventeen years later, she remains in London as CEO of Suse.

“It was a hard go for me in the beginning. I was entering inside of a company that had been very traditional in a sense.”

Photo: Suse

Click banner image for more How I decided seriesA native New Yorker, Melissa Di Donato made a life-changing decision back in 2005 when she packed up for Europe to further her career in technology. Then with IBM, she made London her new home base.

Today, Di Donato is CEO of Germany’s Suse, now a 30-year-old, open-source enterprise software company that specializes in Linux operating systems, container management, storage, and edge computing. As the company’s first female leader, she has led Suse through the coronavirus pandemic, a 2021 IPO on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, and the acquisitions of Kubernetes management startup Rancher Labs and container security company NeuVector.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

UiPath had a rocky few years. Rob Enslin wants to turn it around.

Protocol caught up with Enslin, named earlier this year as UiPath’s co-CEO, to discuss why he left Google Cloud, the untapped potential of robotic-process automation, and how he plans to lead alongside founder Daniel Dines.

Rob Enslin, UiPath's co-CEO, chats with Protocol about the company's future.

Photo: UiPath

UiPath has had a shaky history.

The company, which helps companies automate business processes, went public in 2021 at a valuation of more than $30 billion, but now the company’s market capitalization is only around $7 billion. To add insult to injury, UiPath laid off 5% of its staff in June and then lowered its full-year guidance for fiscal year 2023 just months later, tanking its stock by 15%.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts

Aisha Counts (@aishacounts) is a reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software. Formerly, she was a management consultant for EY. She's based in Los Angeles and can be reached at acounts@protocol.com.


Figma CPO: We can do more with Adobe

Yuhki Yamashita thinks Figma might tackle video or 3D objects someday.

Figman CPO Yuhki Yamashita told Protocol about Adobe's acquisition of the company.

Photo: Figma

Figma CPO Yuhki Yamashita’s first design gig was at The Harvard Crimson, waiting for writers to file their stories so he could lay them out in Adobe InDesign. Given his interest in computer science, pursuing UX design became the clear move. He worked on Outlook at Microsoft, YouTube at Google, and user experience at Uber, where he was a very early user of Figma. In 2019, he became a VP of product at Figma; this past June, he became CPO.

“Design has been really near and dear to my heart, which is why when this opportunity came along to join Figma and rethink design, it was such an obvious opportunity,” Yamashita said.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.


Microsoft lays out its climate advocacy goals

The tech giant has staked out exactly what kind of policies it will support to decarbonize the world and clean up the grid.

Microsoft published two briefs explaining what new climate policies it will advocate for.

Photo by Jeremy Bezanger on Unsplash

The tech industry has no shortage of climate goals, but they’ll be very hard to achieve without the help of sound public policy.

Microsoft published two new briefs on Sept. 22 explaining what policies it will advocate for in the realm of reducing carbon and cleaning up the grid. With policymakers in the U.S. and around the world beginning to weigh more stringent climate policies (or in the U.S.’s case, any serious climate policies at all), the briefs will offer a measuring stick for whether Microsoft is living up to its ideals.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.

Latest Stories