Politics

Trump just vetoed the NDAA because it doesn’t repeal Section 230

But it looks like tech is going to be just fine.

Trump just vetoed the NDAA because it doesn’t repeal Section 230

Lawmakers are set to return to Washington to override his veto next week.

Photo: Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

The tech industry will likely emerge unscathed from a chaotic end-of-year showdown between Congress and President Trump over its Section 230 legal protections.

On Wednesday, the president vetoed the National Defense Authorization Act in part because it does not repeal Section 230 — but tech industry representatives said they remain cautiously optimistic that Congress has enough votes to override the veto later this month.

"The Act fails even to make any meaningful changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, despite bipartisan calls for repealing that provision," Trump said in a message accompanying the veto. "It is a 'gift' to China and Russia," he wrote.

Key lawmakers, including top Republicans, have made it clear they're planning to override the veto, the first time they'll do so during Trump's presidency. Tech lobbyists have largely shrugged off the possibility that Section 230 repeal or reform could actually make it into the NDAA.

"Regarding the NDAA, there appears to be little consternation by the legislators that the veto can't be overridden," said Arthur Sidney, vice president of public policy with the Computer & Communications Industry Association, which represents companies including Google and Facebook. "We are always vigilant because Section 230 is such an important law to both technology companies and consumers. But we're hopeful that, based upon publicly available information, there's enough support to override it."

Meanwhile, congressional aides and lobbyists shot down the prospect of Section 230 repeal playing a serious role in negotiations around the future of the COVID-19 omnibus bill, which Trump has hinted he might veto as well.

"The likelihood of [Section 230 reform] getting attached to NDAA or omnibus, I put as a low threat," said Carl Szabo, vice president of tech trade group NetChoice, describing the feeling within tech as "cautious optimism" and "trust-but-verify."

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a top Trump ally, set off alarm bells with a Tuesday night tweet suggesting the fates of the NDAA and omnibus bill could rest on Democrats' willingness to compromise on Section 230 reform. "I hope Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi will agree with President Trump that Big Tech needs to be reined in by winding down Section 230 liability protections," Graham tweeted. "I have reason to believe this combination will lead to President Trump supporting the NDAA and COVID19 omnibus bills."

But any last-ditch effort to include Section 230 reform language in the sprawling omnibus bill, which is already in a tenuous position, would be a non-starter for Democrats. "There is no move to put 230 repeal on the floor," said one Democratic aide. "Senator Graham is watching too much Fox News."

At the same time that Graham was threatening Section 230 repeal on Twitter, his lead counsel on tech and IP-related issues, Joe Keeley, sent an email announcing he is leaving his position at the end of this year, the Senate Judiciary Committee confirmed. Keeley will move to the Senate Budget Committee during the next session.

Congress is set to return to Washington on Dec. 28 to override Trump's NDAA veto. And lawmakers have indicated they're gearing up for a second override if Trump follows through on his implied threat to veto the omnibus bill, which passed both chambers with huge majorities this week. Trump has claimed that he will not sign the legislation unless lawmakers bump up direct payments from $600 per individual to $2,000 — an effort supported by Democratic leaders and a sticking point for most Republicans.

If Trump does not sign the omnibus bill, he will be holding billions in COVID-19 relief and $1.4 trillion in government funding. He could be teeing up the fourth government shutdown of his tenure, but so far, most Washington insiders remain in the dark about what his next move might be.

The tech industry, meanwhile, will remain on high alert for future threats to its business — especially after President-elect Joe Biden this week appointed Bruce Reed, a close adviser who has called for Section 230 to be completely reformed, to be his deputy chief of staff.

"More time is necessary to consider Section 230 because it is an important issue," Sidney said. "One thing is for sure: It shouldn't be wedged into must-pass legislation."

Fintech

Gavin Newsom shows crypto some California love

“A more flexible approach is needed,” Gov. Newsom said in rejecting a bill that would require crypto companies to get a state license.

Strong bipartisan support wasn’t enough to convince Newsom that requiring crypto companies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation is the smart path for California.

Photo: Jerod Harris/Getty Images for Vox Media

The Digital Financial Assets Law seemed like a legislative slam dunk in California for critics of the crypto industry.

But strong bipartisan support — it passed 71-0 in the state assembly and 31-6 in the Senate — wasn’t enough to convince Gov. Gavin Newsom that requiring crypto companies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation is the smart path for California.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Workplace

Slack’s rallying cry at Dreamforce: No more meetings

It’s not all cartoon bears and therapy pigs — work conferences are a good place to talk about the future of work.

“We want people to be able to work in whatever way works for them with flexible schedules, in meetings and out of meetings,” Slack chief product officer Tamar Yehoshua told Protocol at Dreamforce 2022.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Dreamforce is primarily Salesforce’s show. But Slack wasn’t to be left out, especially as the primary connector between Salesforce and the mainstream working world.

The average knowledge worker spends more time using a communication tool like Slack than a CRM like Salesforce, positioning it as the best Salesforce product to concern itself with the future of work. In between meeting a therapy pig and meditating by the Dreamforce waterfall, Protocol sat down with several Slack execs and conference-goers to chat about the shifting future.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

LA is a growing tech hub. But not everyone may fit.

LA has a housing crisis similar to Silicon Valley’s. And single-family-zoning laws are mostly to blame.

As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers, whose high salaries put them at an advantage in both LA's renting and buying markets.

Photo: Nat Rubio-Licht/Protocol

LA’s tech scene is on the rise. The number of unicorn companies in Los Angeles is growing, and the city has become the third-largest startup ecosystem nationally behind the Bay Area and New York with more than 4,000 VC-backed startups in industries ranging from aerospace to creators. As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers. The city is quickly becoming more and more like Silicon Valley — a new startup and a dozen tech workers on every corner and companies like Google, Netflix, and Twitter setting up offices there.

But with growth comes growing pains. Los Angeles, especially the burgeoning Silicon Beach area — which includes Santa Monica, Venice, and Marina del Rey — shares something in common with its namesake Silicon Valley: a severe lack of housing.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

Policy

SFPD can now surveil a private camera network funded by Ripple chair

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved a policy that the ACLU and EFF argue will further criminalize marginalized groups.

SFPD will be able to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks in certain circumstances.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Ripple chairman and co-founder Chris Larsen has been funding a network of security cameras throughout San Francisco for a decade. Now, the city has given its police department the green light to monitor the feeds from those cameras — and any other private surveillance devices in the city — in real time, whether or not a crime has been committed.

This week, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors approved a controversial plan to allow SFPD to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks during life-threatening emergencies, large events, and in the course of criminal investigations, including investigations of misdemeanors. The decision came despite fervent opposition from groups, including the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which say the police department’s new authority will be misused against protesters and marginalized groups in a city that has been a bastion for both.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories
Bulletins