yesEmily BirnbaumNone
×

Get access to Protocol

I’ve already subscribed

Will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

Politics

Trump just vetoed the NDAA because it doesn’t repeal Section 230

But it looks like tech is going to be just fine.

Trump just vetoed the NDAA because it doesn’t repeal Section 230

Lawmakers are set to return to Washington to override his veto next week.

Photo: Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

The tech industry will likely emerge unscathed from a chaotic end-of-year showdown between Congress and President Trump over its Section 230 legal protections.

On Wednesday, the president vetoed the National Defense Authorization Act in part because it does not repeal Section 230 — but tech industry representatives said they remain cautiously optimistic that Congress has enough votes to override the veto later this month.

"The Act fails even to make any meaningful changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, despite bipartisan calls for repealing that provision," Trump said in a message accompanying the veto. "It is a 'gift' to China and Russia," he wrote.

Key lawmakers, including top Republicans, have made it clear they're planning to override the veto, the first time they'll do so during Trump's presidency. Tech lobbyists have largely shrugged off the possibility that Section 230 repeal or reform could actually make it into the NDAA.

"Regarding the NDAA, there appears to be little consternation by the legislators that the veto can't be overridden," said Arthur Sidney, vice president of public policy with the Computer & Communications Industry Association, which represents companies including Google and Facebook. "We are always vigilant because Section 230 is such an important law to both technology companies and consumers. But we're hopeful that, based upon publicly available information, there's enough support to override it."

Meanwhile, congressional aides and lobbyists shot down the prospect of Section 230 repeal playing a serious role in negotiations around the future of the COVID-19 omnibus bill, which Trump has hinted he might veto as well.

"The likelihood of [Section 230 reform] getting attached to NDAA or omnibus, I put as a low threat," said Carl Szabo, vice president of tech trade group NetChoice, describing the feeling within tech as "cautious optimism" and "trust-but-verify."

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a top Trump ally, set off alarm bells with a Tuesday night tweet suggesting the fates of the NDAA and omnibus bill could rest on Democrats' willingness to compromise on Section 230 reform. "I hope Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi will agree with President Trump that Big Tech needs to be reined in by winding down Section 230 liability protections," Graham tweeted. "I have reason to believe this combination will lead to President Trump supporting the NDAA and COVID19 omnibus bills."

But any last-ditch effort to include Section 230 reform language in the sprawling omnibus bill, which is already in a tenuous position, would be a non-starter for Democrats. "There is no move to put 230 repeal on the floor," said one Democratic aide. "Senator Graham is watching too much Fox News."

At the same time that Graham was threatening Section 230 repeal on Twitter, his lead counsel on tech and IP-related issues, Joe Keeley, sent an email announcing he is leaving his position at the end of this year, the Senate Judiciary Committee confirmed. Keeley will move to the Senate Budget Committee during the next session.

Congress is set to return to Washington on Dec. 28 to override Trump's NDAA veto. And lawmakers have indicated they're gearing up for a second override if Trump follows through on his implied threat to veto the omnibus bill, which passed both chambers with huge majorities this week. Trump has claimed that he will not sign the legislation unless lawmakers bump up direct payments from $600 per individual to $2,000 — an effort supported by Democratic leaders and a sticking point for most Republicans.

If Trump does not sign the omnibus bill, he will be holding billions in COVID-19 relief and $1.4 trillion in government funding. He could be teeing up the fourth government shutdown of his tenure, but so far, most Washington insiders remain in the dark about what his next move might be.

The tech industry, meanwhile, will remain on high alert for future threats to its business — especially after President-elect Joe Biden this week appointed Bruce Reed, a close adviser who has called for Section 230 to be completely reformed, to be his deputy chief of staff.

"More time is necessary to consider Section 230 because it is an important issue," Sidney said. "One thing is for sure: It shouldn't be wedged into must-pass legislation."

Power

Yes, GameStop is a content moderation issue for Reddit

The same tools that can be used to build mass movements can be used by bad actors to manipulate the masses later on. Consider Reddit warned.

WallStreetBets' behavior may not be illegal. But that doesn't mean it's not a problem for Reddit.

Image: Omar Marques/Getty Images

The Redditors who are driving up the cost of GameStop stock just to pwn the hedge funds that bet on its demise may not be breaking the law. But this show of force by the subreddit r/WallStreetBets still represents a new and uncharted front in the evolution of content moderation on social media platforms.

In a statement to Protocol, a Reddit spokesperson said the company's site-wide policies "prohibit posting illegal content or soliciting or facilitating illegal transactions. We will review and cooperate with valid law enforcement investigations or actions as needed."

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky
Issie Lapowsky (@issielapowsky) is a senior reporter at Protocol, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University’s Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing. Email Issie.

The Capitol riots scrambled FCC Republicans’ Section 230 plans. What now?

The FCC's top tech agitators have been almost silent about Big Tech's Trump bans.

The commissioners will gingerly walk a line of condemning the tech platforms without seeming like they are condoning the rhetoric that led to Trump's suspensions or the takedown of Parler.

Photo: Jonathan Newton-Pool/Getty Images

Brendan Carr, one of the Federal Communications Commission's two Republicans, spent the better part of 2020 blasting Big Tech platforms for allegedly censoring conservative speech, appearing on Fox News and right-wing podcasts to claim that social media companies exhibited bias against President Trump and the GOP more broadly.

But in the weeks since Twitter, Facebook and YouTube suspended former President Trump and removed large swaths of his supporters in the wake of the violent riot on Capitol Hill, Carr has remained largely silent about the deplatforming, except to condemn the violence. "Political violence is completely unacceptable," Carr told reporters days after the riot. "It's clear to me President Trump bears responsibility."

Keep Reading Show less
Emily Birnbaum

Emily Birnbaum ( @birnbaum_e) is a tech policy reporter with Protocol. Her coverage focuses on the U.S. government's attempts to regulate one of the most powerful industries in the world, with a focus on antitrust, privacy and politics. Previously, she worked as a tech policy reporter with The Hill after spending several months as a breaking news reporter. She is a Bethesda, Maryland native and proud Kenyon College alumna.

Politics

Facebook’s Oversight Board won’t save it from the Trump ban backlash

The Board's decision on whether to reinstate Trump could set a new precedent for Facebook. But does the average user care what the Board has to say?

A person holds a sign during a Free Speech Rally against tech companies, on Jan. 20 in California.

Photo: Valerie Macon/Getty Images

Two weeks after Facebook suspended former President Donald Trump's account indefinitely, Facebook answered a chorus of calls and referred the case to its newly created Oversight Board for review. Now, the board has 90 days to make a call as to whether Trump stays or goes permanently. The board's decision — and more specifically, how and why it arrives at that decision — could have consequences not only for other global leaders on Facebook, but for the future of the Board itself.

Facebook created its Oversight Board for such a time as this — a time when it would face a controversial content moderation decision and might need a gut check. Or a fall guy. There could be no decision more controversial than the one Facebook made on Jan. 7, when it decided to muzzle one of the most powerful people in the world with weeks remaining in his presidency. It stands to reason, then, that Facebook would tap in its newly anointed refs on the Oversight Board both to earnestly review the call and to put a little distance between Facebook and the decision.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky
Issie Lapowsky (@issielapowsky) is a senior reporter at Protocol, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University’s Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing. Email Issie.
Protocol | China

More women are joining China's tech elite, but 'Wolf Culture' isn't going away

It turns out getting rid of misogyny in Chinese tech isn't just a numbers game.

Chinese tech companies that claim to value female empowerment may act differently behind closed doors.

Photo: Qilai Shen/Getty Images

A woman we'll call Fan had heard about the men of Alibaba before she joined its high-profile affiliate about three years ago. Some of them were "greasy," she said, to use a Chinese term often describing middle-aged men with poor boundaries. Fan tells Protocol that lewd conversations were omnipresent at team meetings and private events, and even women would feel compelled to crack off-color jokes in front of the men. Some male supervisors treated younger female colleagues like personal assistants.

Within six months, despite the cachet the lucrative job carried, Fan wanted to quit.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu is a Reporter with Protocol | China. She has spent six years covering China from inside and outside its borders. Previously, she was a fellow at Asia Society's ChinaFile and a Beijing-based producer for CNN. Her writing has appeared in Foreign Policy, The New York Times and POLITICO, among other publications. Shen Lu is a founding member of Chinese Storytellers, a community serving and elevating Chinese professionals in the global media industry.

Big Tech gets a win from Biden’s sweeping immigration actions

Tim Cook and Sundar Pichai praised President Biden's immigration actions, which read like a tech industry wishlist.

Newly-inaugurated President Joe Biden signed two immigration-related executive orders on Wednesday.

Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Immediately after being sworn in as president Wednesday, Joe Biden signed two pro-immigration executive orders and delivered an immigration bill to Congress that reads like a tech industry wishlist. The move drew enthusiastic praise from tech leaders, including Apple CEO Tim Cook and Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai.

President Biden nullified several of former-President Trump's most hawkish immigration policies. His executive orders reversed the so-called "Muslim ban" and instructed the attorney general and the secretary of Homeland Security to preserve the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program, which the Trump administration had sought to end. He also sent an expansive immigration reform bill to Congress that would provide a pathway to citizenship for undocumented individuals and make it easier for foreign U.S. graduates with STEM degrees to stay in the United States, among other provisions.

Keep Reading Show less
Emily Birnbaum

Emily Birnbaum ( @birnbaum_e) is a tech policy reporter with Protocol. Her coverage focuses on the U.S. government's attempts to regulate one of the most powerful industries in the world, with a focus on antitrust, privacy and politics. Previously, she worked as a tech policy reporter with The Hill after spending several months as a breaking news reporter. She is a Bethesda, Maryland native and proud Kenyon College alumna.

Latest Stories