Twitter is getting serious about getting verification right

After years of somewhat haphazard thinking about identity, Twitter has a plan for the blue checks.

Twitter’s new verification process.

Twitter's new verification process.

Photo: Twitter

Twitter is reopening its public verification process, years after it stopped accepting new applications. Just as important, the company is also trying to be more transparent and thoughtful about who gets verified and why.

The new verification system is rolling out starting Thursday. The process is simple enough: Users can go to their account settings to find the application, in which they will have to explain who they are and why they qualify, provide some sort of official identification and wait between a few days and a few weeks to see if they've been accepted. Most users won't be.

Twitter considered allowing anyone with a government-issued ID to apply for verification, Twitter's B Byrne said on a call with reporters. But that comes with its own tension. "Every form of verification has to balance the trade-off between accidentally keeping authentic accounts out," Byrne said, "and on the other side, being able to keep inauthentic accounts out." Too many accounts being verified "wouldn't really be a meaningful signal of anything," he said, but not verifying anyone doesn't solve anything, either. So Twitter landed on "notable accounts with high public interest," the sorts of people most users look for and follow who tend to be the sources of important information.

That has always been the kind of account that Twitter verified, but the company has never really said so before. The initial idea behind Twitter's blue-check verification system was simple enough: The platform needed a way to communicate that yes, this is the real Barack Obama/Oprah/Pope, not an imposter posting memes or jokes. But over time, the blue check came to be seen as a symbol of legitimacy, even of Twitter's tacit support of an account. Twitter was always quick to say that wasn't the case, but users saw it as a way for Twitter to play favorites.

The whole thing came crashing down in 2017, after Twitter verified the account of Jason Kessler, one of the organizers of the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville. After huge backlash to Twitter's apparent blessing of Kessler's account and actions, Twitter paused its verification program entirely. "We recognize that we have created this confusion and need to resolve it. We have paused all general verifications while we work and will report back soon," Twitter's support account said. That was November 9, 2017.

Some accounts have been verified since then, but there has been no public or transparent process by which someone can get a blue check. The system is so bad it's a running joke within Twitter: CEO Jack Dorsey and head of consumer product Kayvon Beykpour often tell their followers to just DM the other to get verified. (It doesn't work.)

But last fall, three years after pausing its official program, Twitter announced plans to bring it back. Six kinds of "Notable Accounts" would be eligible for a blue check, from politicians to activists to athletes to brands. All had to meet a certain threshold of fame to even qualify for verification. There were also new rules for how an account might be denied verification for breaking Twitter's rules, or have it removed in the future.

What a blue check means, and signifies, is still a slightly complicated question. About 360,000 people are currently verified on Twitter, Byrne said, which is already a small fraction of Twitter users. By narrowing the group of people who can theoretically be verified even further, Twitter risks turning verification into an even more powerful stamp of approval. It can deny or revoke verification on accounts that break its rules, which Twitter's Sarah Husain said will be handled "on a case-by-case basis." Millions of accounts spend their days doing problematic things without technically breaking the rules, and no matter how broadly Twitter eventually defines "notable," it will leave out some people for whom verification is a crucial tool to help avoid being impersonated or harassed.

Identity is a big question for Twitter in general going forward. So many of the company's recent product moves have been in service of making Twitter a better public presence for users, and if it becomes something like the internet's messaging service, making it easy for people to identify themselves and find each other becomes incredibly important. Twitter is working on ways to better signify automated and memorialized accounts, and has already built ways to better identify political figures. (You may have seen the "Senate Candidate" flags on various Twitter accounts last election cycle, for instance.) It's also adding a specific field for people to share their pronouns.

"Your profile is the first place that people go to see what you're about," said Andrea Conway, a designer at Twitter. But there's more to a person than fits in a location tag and a one-sentence bio. Twitter is trying to figure out how to let people express themselves to the fullest extent, inside a service known for its simplicity and brevity. People don't fit into 280 characters, and so increasingly, neither does Twitter.

Climate

A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Policy

The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Enterprise

Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well-established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins