Power

Uber buying Grubhub could give it a stranglehold on U.S. food delivery

A deal would consolidate an ultracompetitive market — but regulators could intervene.

An Uber Eats delivery bike

The merger would pit two SoftBank-backed companies against each other in a race to control the food delivery nationwide.

Photo: Matthew Horwood/Getty Images

Uber is reportedly in talks to take over Grubhub, news that sent both companies' stock prices soaring Tuesday. The deal, if it went through, would mark a seismic shift in the food-delivery wars, potentially giving Uber the majority of the U.S. market share, according to analysts. It would also pit two SoftBank-backed companies against each other in a race to control the food delivery nationwide.

The move would consolidate a large chunk of the U.S. delivery market into Uber's pocket, at a time when its main ride-share business is suffering from the pandemic. But the merger wouldn't be without its challenges. Grubhub primarily operates a different business model than Uber's, offering a platform for restaurants that do their own delivery. The merger would also have to fight off regulatory challenges, and potentially even counterbids from competitors.

Consolidation in the space has been expected for some time, as Grubhub has reportedly been shopping around for a buyer since January. But it was a question of who would end up teaming up — and when. If Uber had merged with its other main competitor, DoorDash, it would mean that Uber would've taken out an aggressive spender. But DoorDash, most recently valued at nearly $13 billion, may have been too costly for Uber to take on — indeed, talks last year reportedly fell through. A merger with Grubhub, whose market cap was $4.3 billion before the deal was reported, instead would increase Uber's market share, particularly in lucrative cities like New York, while not necessarily breaking the bank. It would also bring on a new inventory of restaurants that do their own deliveries instead of relying on other couriers, as many of the restaurants on Uber Eats do.

While Grubhub used to control the U.S. food market, SoftBank-backed DoorDash took the lead in 2019. Together, a combined Grubhub and Uber Eats could now control around 55% of the market share, according to analysts at Wedbush. DoorDash would have 35%, followed by Postmates, which has pursued more of a regional dominance strategy in cities like Los Angeles. Both Postmates and DoorDash have confidentially filed to go public, although the window for an IPO may be closed for some time, given the pandemic. Wedbush analysts also said in a note shared with Protocol that this merger might not go ahead without a fight, writing that they "wouldn't rule out a bidding war with DoorDash … as it, too, will look to whether it makes sense to purchase market dominance."

The move could also spark more mergers in the food delivery market, PitchBook analyst Asad Hussain said. "The wave of food delivery consolidation in North America is finally here, and we expect it to continue in the coming months," he said. "We believe companies such as DoorDash and Postmates could be likely merger candidates going forward."

Grubhub did not comment on the takeover reports, but said in a statement that "consolidation could make sense in our industry and, like any responsible company, we are always looking at value-enhancing opportunities." Uber told Protocol that it didn't comment on M&A rumors or speculation, and DoorDash also declined to comment. Postmates wasn't immediately available for comment.

That market dominance also invites the specter of regulation. It's hard to see how reduced competition wouldn't lead to higher prices, which could lead regulators — already examining tech acquisitions for anticompetitive behavior — to intervene. "There's reasonable questions as to whether or not they can get a deal done," D.A. Davidson analyst Tom White told Bloomberg News. "I think Uber's got a bit of a target on their back, if you will, in the eyes of regulators."

It's already attracting notice. U.S. Rep. David Cicilline, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary's antitrust subcommittee, said in a statement that the deal "underscores" the need for a merger moratorium. Though Cicilline previously proposed including a merger moratorium in the upcoming congressional stimulus package, the bill unveiled by Democrats on Tuesday did not include any pause on M&A activity. "Uber is a notoriously predatory company that has long denied its drivers a living wage. Its attempt to acquire Grubhub — which has a history of exploiting local restaurants through deceptive tactics and extortionate fees — marks a new low in pandemic profiteering," Cicilline said. "We cannot allow these corporations to monopolize food delivery, especially amid a crisis that is rendering American families and local restaurants more dependent than ever on these very services."

Grubhub, founded in 2004, has been in the food delivery game for a lot longer than anyone else. It built a profitable business with its marketplace model, which aggregates restaurants that offer delivery services into a large platform. For years, the company resisted doing the deliveries itself. But its profitable model came under threat in recent years, thanks to an influx of new VC-backed competition like DoorDash, Postmates, Caviar and Uber Eats. SoftBank, which has invested around $7.6 billion in Uber and an estimated $600 million to $900 million in DoorDash, has been a major driver of the trend.

Those companies, which have their own delivery drivers pick up and drop off food, have sparked a price war in the industry. They forced Grubhub to enter the logistics space, despite executives telling investors that it didn't believe "that a company can generate significant profits on just the logistics component of the business."

Last October, Grubhub executives said "online diners are becoming more promiscuous," saying that "the easy wins in the market are disappearing a little more quickly than we thought." Things were set to ease up a little this year, with firms like Uber and Postmates focused on improving their margins. But the pandemic threw a spanner in the works by reigniting the price war. That means that the significant uplift in orders isn't translating into a meaningful earnings improvement.

Deutsche Bank analyst Kunal Madhukar said Monday that Grubhub is likely discounting "in the mid-to-high-single-digit range across all delivery orders." In the first quarter of 2019, Grubhub made a profit of almost $7 million. This year, the first quarter led to a $33.4 million loss. With Uber knocking on the door, now might be a good time to call it a day.

Update (4:50pm): This post has been updated with comments from U.S. congressman David Cicilline.

If you search "Wordle" on the App Store right now, you'll find nearly a dozen copycat versions of the game.
Screenshot: Nick Statt/Protocol

On this episode of the Source Code podcast: Nick Statt joins the show to discuss the rise of Wordle, the subsequent rise of the Wordle clones, and why it’s so easy to copy a game. Then Ben Pimentel chats about the fight over Web3, why Jack Dorsey and Marc Andreessen are at odds, and the killer app for the future of the web. Finally, Allison Levitsky explains some of the big new future-of-work trends, including the four-day workweek and dog-walker perks.

For more on the topics in this episode:

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Greg Petraetis, SVP and Managing Director, Midmarket and Partner Ecosystem, North America at SAP

As businesses grow during the pandemic, they also encounter pressing challenges to maintain that success. Among them is the pressure to strengthen their digital backbone, which leads to the question: How can companies find the ideal technology provider suited to their evolving needs?

In the midmarket space, small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) often need support to buoy them through any choppy waters ahead. As a SaaS solutions provider, SAP has extensive expertise developing strategies to connect innovative companies with their customers.

“We’ve seen how so many SMBs want to become the next billion-dollar companies as they move from being innovators and disruptors to global leaders,” says Greg Petraetis, senior vice president and managing director, Midmarket and Partner Ecosystem, North America at SAP, in an interview with Protocol. “And we’re there to catch them along that trajectory and help them achieve that profitable growth.”

Keep Reading Show less
David Silverberg
David Silverberg is a Toronto-based freelance journalist, editor and writing coach. He writes for The Washington Post, BBC News, Business Insider, The Toronto Star, New Scientist, Fodor's, and several alumni magazines. He also writes for brands such as 23andme, Shopify and Bold Commerce. He has served as editor of B2B News Network, Canada's only B2B news magazine, and Digital Journal, a leading pioneer in citizen journalism. Find more about him at www.davidsilverberg.ca
China

Will there be China tech IPOs to watch in 2022?

After the DiDi chaos, Chinese companies are cautiously looking to return to the capital market.

If TikTok parent company ByteDance went public this year, it would undoubtedly become the biggest IPO of any Chinese company in 2022.

Photo Illustration: Omar Marques/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

As 2022 begins, the biggest question for China IPO watchers is: Will there still be any significant IPOs this year worth anticipating?

For them, 2021 was divided into two halves: The first six months were filled with ambitious Chinese companies listing overseas, culminating in ride-hailing giant DiDi’s IPO on June 30, but it was all downhill from there. In the wake of DiDi’s rushed IPO, Chinese regulators imposed harsh cybersecurity reviews on several companies that were about to go public. Others put their IPO plans on hold. Stock markets reacted accordingly: Alibaba, Pinduoduo and others saw their share prices slashed in half.

Keep Reading Show less
Zeyi Yang

Zeyi Yang is a reporter with Protocol | China. Previously, he worked as a reporting fellow for the digital magazine Rest of World, covering the intersection of technology and culture in China and neighboring countries. He has also contributed to the South China Morning Post, Nikkei Asia, Columbia Journalism Review, among other publications. In his spare time, Zeyi co-founded a Mandarin podcast that tells LGBTQ stories in China. He has been playing Pokemon for 14 years and has a weird favorite pick.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Entertainment

Will NFT backlash stop the blockchain gaming boom?

Few players seem to want NFTs. But that might not be enough to stop blockchain gaming from going mainstream.

NFTs in particular, and the broader blockchain gaming movement of which they are a part, have elicited a rare level of polarization among players, developers and large game-makers.
Illustration: fairywong/DigitalVision Vectors/Getty Images; Protocol

The non-fungible token debate has moved from the art world to the gaming industry, and it’s morphed into an all-consuming fight about the future of entertainment and what role, if any, the crypto movement should play in the way video games make money.

From microtransactions to crunch culture, the video game industry is full of unsavory business practices that persist in spite of widespread backlash among the general gaming audience and near-constant denunciation from outspoken industry leaders and critics. That’s in part because such practices are often lucrative or steeped in industry norms that are difficult or costly to change.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt
Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.

Tech workers want three-day weekends. It won’t be possible everywhere, but more companies are starting to consider it.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Welcome back to Ask a Tech Worker. For this recurring feature, I’ve been hitting the streets of San Francisco’s Financial District at lunchtime to chat with tech employees about how the workplace is changing. This time I asked about the four-day work week, that elusive schedule that companies like Bolt, Signifyd, Panasonic, Eidos-Montréal and Wildbit have adopted and a number of others have tested or considered. Got a suggestion for a future topic? Email me.

The four-day work week may be the next frontier for tech companies using work-life balance to compete for talent. Since the New Year, Bolt, commerce protection platform Signifyd and Panasonic have all announced that they’re offering four-day weeks to employees.

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.
Latest Stories
Bulletins