Power

Why Uber's big deal for Grubhub fell out — and a European suitor stepped in

The deal was reportedly nixed due to antitrust concerns, which have shadowed the courtship since it was revealed publicly.

Hands holding donuts

How many ways can the food delivery market be split among companies? Recent moves signal a trend toward consolidation.

Photo: Tu Trinh/Unsplash

The hottest deal in tech isn't happening after all: Uber's acquisition talks with Grubhub have collapsed, and Grubhub instead will merge with European giant Just Eat Takeaway.com.

The Uber deal was reportedly nixed due to antitrust concerns, which shadowed the courtship since it was revealed publicly. Rep. David Cicilline, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary's antitrust subcommittee, called the potential deal "a new low in pandemic profiteering," while a group of Democratic senators asked the FTC and Department of Justice to look into the acquisition, which they claimed would "raise serious competition issues." Based on a Wedbush analysis, a combined Grubhub and Uber Eats would have controlled around 55% of the U.S. restaurant delivery market.

Amid this political uncertainty, Grubhub reportedly wanted Uber to agree to a cash breakup fee, to be paid in the event that the deal didn't go through. Uber was seemingly reluctant to commit — and has now bailed altogether.

Fortunately for the struggling Grubhub, an overseas savior emerged. Grubhub and Just Eat Takeaway.com (which we'll call JET) announced Wednesday that they'll merge in an all-stock deal. JET is itself the product of a merger, with the Dutch Takeaway.com acquiring Britain's Just Eat this year for around $7.4 billion.

Grubhub, which is worth around $5 billion, will finally give the European firm a foothold in the U.S., delivery's second-biggest market. JET's lack of a U.S. presence up to now also means that the deal is unlikely to run afoul of U.S. regulators, who don't have to worry about decreased competition in the American market.

That's not the only reason this deal makes sense. Like Grubhub, JET's primary focus is a marketplace-based model, one that pairs consumers with restaurants that handle their own delivery. Uber Eats, meanwhile, pays its own drivers — a business that Grubhub executives famously said would never "generate significant profits," but were forced to enter in the face of competition from DoorDash, Postmates and Uber Eats.

Should the merger go through, then, a crucial question will be whether Grubhub continues to do its own deliveries (something that JET has also experimented with) or if it retreats to its once-successful marketplace-only model.

Grubhub could also benefit from having an owner that is singularly dedicated to delivering food and one that's been in the game for a long time. Both Just Eat and Takeaway.com were founded in 2000, before Grubhub's 2004 founding and significantly earlier than Uber Eats' 2014 launch.

For Uber, the loss of the deal is a mixed bag. Uber wanted to expand Eats' market share, helping to boost its least-unprofitable segment — and may now struggle to do so. But there could be a silver lining. With Uber under significant financial and regulatory pressures, a complex merger might not have been the best idea right now. Without Grubhub to distract it, Uber can focus on its core business of moving people.

This post was updated with more information about the Just Eat Takeaway.com merger.

Fintech

Election markets are far from a sure bet

Kalshi has big-name backing for its plan to offer futures contracts tied to election results. Will that win over a long-skeptical regulator?

Whether Kalshi’s election contracts could be considered gaming or whether they serve a true risk-hedging purpose is one of the top questions the CFTC is weighing in its review.

Photo illustration: Getty Images; Protocol

Crypto isn’t the only emerging issue on the CFTC’s plate. The futures regulator is also weighing a fintech sector that has similarly tricky political implications: election bets.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has set Oct. 28 as a date by which it hopes to decide whether the New York-based startup Kalshi can offer a form of wagering up to $25,000 on which party will control the House of Representatives and Senate after the midterms. PredictIt, another online market for election trading, has also sued the regulator over its decision to cancel a no-action letter.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Enterprise

The Uber verdict shows why mandatory disclosure isn't such a bad idea

The conviction of Uber's former chief security officer, Joe Sullivan, seems likely to change some minds in the debate over proposed cyber incident reporting regulations.

Executives and boards will now be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up," said one information security veteran.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

If nothing else, the guilty verdict delivered Wednesday in a case involving Uber's former security head will have this effect on how breaches are handled in the future: Executives and boards, according to information security veteran Michael Hamilton, will be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up."

Following the conviction of former Uber chief security officer Joe Sullivan, "we likely will get better voluntary reporting" of cyber incidents, said Hamilton, formerly the chief information security officer of the City of Seattle, and currently the founder and CISO at cybersecurity vendor Critical Insight.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.

Climate

Delta and MIT are running flight tests to fix contrails

The research team and airline are running flight tests to determine if it’s possible to avoid the climate-warming effects of contrails.

Delta and MIT just announced a partnership to test how to mitigate persistent contrails.

Photo: Gabriela Natiello/Unsplash

Contrails could be responsible for up to 2% of all global warming, and yet how they’re formed and how to mitigate them is barely understood by major airlines.

That may be changing.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Entertainment

Inside Amazon’s free video strategy

Amazon has been doubling down on original content for Freevee, its ad-supported video service, which has seen a lot of growth thanks to a deep integration with other Amazon properties.

Freevee’s investment into original programming like 'Bosch: Legacy' has increased by 70%.

Photo: Tyler Golden/Amazon Freevee

Amazon’s streaming efforts have long been all about Prime Video. So the company caught pundits by surprise when, in early 2019, it launched a stand-alone ad-supported streaming service called IMDb Freedive, with Techcrunch calling the move “a bit odd.”

Nearly four years and two rebrandings later, Amazon’s ad-supported video efforts appear to be flourishing. Viewership of the service grew by 138% from 2020 to 2021, according to Amazon. The company declined to share any updated performance data on the service, which is now called Freevee, but a spokesperson told Protocol the performance of originals in particular “exceeded expectations,” leading Amazon to increase investments into original content by 70% year-over-year.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Latest Stories
Bulletins