Source Code: Your daily look at what matters in tech.

source-codesource codeauthorLauren HeplerNoneWant your finger on the pulse of everything that's happening in tech? Sign up to get David Pierce's daily newsletter.64fd3cbe9f
×

Get access to Protocol

Your information will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

I’m already a subscriber
People

Coronavirus slowed Uber and Lyft — but not their big-money efforts to undo AB 5

The gig economy companies added $267,000 to a California campaign that seeks to rewrite the rules for contract workers.

Driveshare workers hold signs supporting AB5

Uber and Lyft drivers protested in Los Angeles in early February, saying they worked long hours without employee benefits.

Photo: Ronen Tivony/Echoes Wire/Barcroft Media via Getty Images

As the San Francisco Bay Area locked down, Silicon Valley's political machine kept churning. On March 17 — the day authorities ordered millions of people to shelter in place to limit the spread of coronavirus — Uber chipped in $21,960 to a $110.6 million war chest it has amassed with fellow gig-economy heavyweights Lyft, Instacart, DoorDash and Postmates, state records show.

Their goal: to convince California voters to support a November ballot initiative that would reverse a new state law, Assembly Bill 5, that sought to require legions of contract drivers and shoppers to be paid and treated as full-time employees.

The contribution, though modest, was one of 10 that Uber and Lyft made since the first California cases of COVID-19 appeared in late January, totaling more than $267,000, records show. The payments are an indicator that one of the defining policy fights of the tech industry — which could determine the viability of an entire sector and the fate of millions of workers — is likely to get wrapped up in a swirl of money and politics, as voters deal with the fallout of the pandemic and choose a new president.

Everyone agrees that the turn to social distancing has fundamentally changed the battle over gig work, now that on-demand delivery has emerged as an essential service in a global crisis. What Uber, Lyft and their allies are betting is that, with their war chest, they can win with a message that their business model built on low labor costs has been vindicated — and that they can parlay a victory into gains in other states.

But lawmakers and a new wave of gig worker advocacy groups that have supported AB 5 say the lesson of the lockdowns is just the opposite, that vital workers need to be treated as such. With a louder voice and increasing leverage, they say gig companies should focus on worker safety, comply with the new law and give up the ballot measure — and perhaps even liquidate the campaign fund to give workers raises.

"COVID-19 has made it very clear that this is a tenuous situation," said Rey Fuentes, an attorney with the Oakland office of Partnership for Working Families, a labor advocacy group. "It really puts in stark relief the companies' continued reliance on a business model that is now contrary to law in many states."

Gig companies contend that the economic rationale behind their campaign to keep workers classified as contractors is clearer than ever. Some need additional bodies all over the country — up to 300,000, in the case of Instacart — and laid-off workers can turn to their platforms for fast cash.

"We've seen the stuff that labor's been putting out, and we just fundamentally disagree on every front," said Stacey Wells, campaign spokesperson for the coalition supporting the ballot measure. "Employment is not going to work for the vast majority of people who drive delivery and ride-share."

Whether gig workers win full or partial benefits like paid sick leave, health care and overtime pay rests not only with the ballot measure but a web of court cases, administrative wage claims, and challenges from local officials. In the meantime, as competing petitions and social media campaigns spread from the rival camps, workers must rely on emergency provisions like hand sanitizer and limited paid leave if they can produce a positive COVID-19 test.

"AB 5 was obviously a watershed moment, but that struggle's not over," said San Francisco Supervisor Gordon Mar, a former labor organizer who recently authored a resolution calling on city and state attorneys to bring an injunction to force gig economy companies to hire contractors as employees. "In the current health crisis, it's even more urgent."

Following the money

In all, Uber and Lyft gave $267,283 from late January through mid-March to support the "Protect App-Based Drivers and Services Act," according to filings with the California Secretary of State. Lyft made the biggest contribution in that period with a $70,000 payment on March 1, just as Gov. Gavin Newsom started warning of looming shortages of protective equipment like masks.

The campaign kicked off last fall, before AB 5 was officially signed into law, when Uber, DoorDash and Lyft each loaned $30 million to the campaign. Instacart and Postmates contributed another $10 million apiece.

The campaign has also had a busy start to 2020 on the ground. In late March, while the rest of California was sheltered in place, the gig company coalition submitted 1 million signatures to election officials who are now evaluating whether they achieved the required 623,212 valid signatures. The signatures were gathered in January and February by 1,000 volunteer ride-hailing drivers as well as paid petitioners, Wells said. Despite the unexpected uncertainty with the virus, she said the campaign is continuing as planned.

"Most of the public doesn't really start paying attention until Labor Day, so we're still doing what we would be doing," Wells said. "There's still a lot happening."

Uber and Lyft did not answer specific questions from Protocol about their support of the ballot measure, or whether they plan to continue campaign contributions amid reports of mounting financial pressure. Last week, The Information reported that Uber's passenger revenue was poised to plummet due to the lockdowns to about half the monthly $800 million the company generated this time last year. Uber reported $10.9 billion in cash on hand last year; Lyft said it had $358 million.

The California ballot measure is part of a broader political strategy for the companies. Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi successfully lobbied President Trump and federal lawmakers to include contract workers like Uber's 1.3 million drivers in a taxpayer-funded stimulus bill promising increased unemployment benefits. There should be a "third way" for gig workers to access some protections, Khosrowshahi argued, as opposed to strict employee classification requirements.

"It would radically change Uber's core service and business model," Khosrowshahi wrote to Trump, "and would ultimately lead to restrictions on access to income for millions of people looking for this type of work."

Any drastic change to Uber or Lyft's cost structures would affect consumers who have gotten used to cheap rides. Though comprehensive data on gig economy pay and employment is hard to come by, industry estimates peg the cost of contractors at 20% to 30% less than employees.

For people like Carlos Ramos, a 38-year-old military veteran and Lyft driver in Bakersfield who previously advocated for AB 5 with Gig Workers Rising, the promised financial relief has yet to materialize. In mid-March, he stopped commuting to the Bay Area, where he often stayed with family for days at a time so he could pick up higher fares near San Francisco. He felt fine but worried about what he might bring home to family members who live nearby.

"I really started to think about the fact that people over 60 are dying," Ramos said. "My mother just turned 60 two weeks ago."

Ramos said he drives a Mercedes C300 sedan because it makes him eligible for the company's better-paid Lyft Lux rides. But without fares coming in, he said, the car is just one of many financial stresses as he waits for either a government stimulus check or the unemployment benefits he applied for.

"We're in this holding pattern," Ramos said. "That's been very indicative of this whole thing. You see it on the horizon, but you don't have anything at your front door."

The gig game plan

Gig economy companies are far from the first to try to shift the burden for costly employee benefits to their workers or taxpayers. Service sector employers like Walmart and McDonald's have been criticized for paying hourly workers minimum wage while they rely on food stamps, government health plans and other safety net programs.

But the pressure on gig work employers has magnified in recent weeks as labor groups organized strikes against companies including Instacart and Amazon. The groups, most with varied ties to more established labor unions, include Gig Workers Rising, Rideshare Drivers United and We Drive Progress.

The latter group, which directs inquiries to an email address for the Service Employees International Union, listed demands on its website and asked visitors to send them via an online form directly to executives at companies like Uber. In addition to liquidating the ballot measure fund, We Drive Progress called on Uber and Lyft to comply with AB 5, begin paying into California's state unemployment fund, and guarantee paid sick leave for drivers with any symptoms of COVID-19 at a minimum $15 per hour and 30 hours per week.

"At this stage it's really challenging, because the gears of the legal system move far slower than our imagination," said Fuentes of Partnership for Working Families. "This is absolutely a long-term fight."

Labor advocates have won court battles, including a San Diego injunction against Instacart, though that ruling was not enforced during ongoing appeals. In recent months, individual drivers have also begun filing wage claims with local labor boards, and city attorneys, the state attorney general or investigative agencies like those within the state Department of Industrial Relations may bring additional enforcement actions.

But the ballot measure could be a game-changer for the companies. The measure — which would have companies issue stipends for health care and provide some access to worker's compensation, but bar workers from unionizing or being classified as employees — could not be amended in the future without a seven-eigths supermajority of the state legislature.

"That's why they're spending $110 million," Fuentes said. "It's solving the problem."


Get in touch with us: Share information securely with Protocol via encrypted Signal or WhatsApp message, at 415-214-4715 or through our anonymous SecureDrop.


Wells, the campaign spokesperson, said the high bar to amend the bill was added to prevent the state's Democratic majority from undoing "the will of the voters on a whim." For now, she said, the deep-pocketed campaign continues to operate over Zoom calls, and she isn't worried about future fundraising prospects.

"We're comfortable where we are right now," Wells said. "The whole world is in a different place than where it was 30 days ago."

Protocol | Workplace

In Silicon Valley, it’s February 2020 all over again

"We'll reopen when it's right, but right now the world is changing too much."

Tech companies are handling the delta variant in differing ways.

Photo: alvarez/Getty Images

It's still 2021, right? Because frankly, it's starting to feel like March 2020 all over again.

Google, Apple, Uber and Lyft have now all told employees they won't have to come back to the office before October as COVID-19 case counts continue to tick back up. Facebook, Google and Uber are now requiring workers to get vaccinated before coming to the office, and Twitter — also requiring vaccines — went so far as to shut down its reopened offices on Wednesday, and put future office reopenings on hold.

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.

After a year and a half of living and working through a pandemic, it's no surprise that employees are sending out stress signals at record rates. According to a 2021 study by Indeed, 52% of employees today say they feel burnt out. Over half of employees report working longer hours, and a quarter say they're unable to unplug from work.

The continued swell of reported burnout is a concerning trend for employers everywhere. Not only does it harm mental health and well-being, but it can also impact absenteeism, employee retention and — between the drain on morale and high turnover — your company culture.

Crisis management is one thing, but how do you permanently lower the temperature so your teams can recover sustainably? Companies around the world are now taking larger steps to curb burnout, with industry leaders like LinkedIn, Hootsuite and Bumble shutting down their offices for a full week to allow all employees extra time off. The CEO of Okta, worried about burnout, asked all employees to email him their vacation plans in 2021.

Keep Reading Show less
Stella Garber
Stella Garber is Trello's Head of Marketing. Stella has led Marketing at Trello for the last seven years from early stage startup all the way through its acquisition by Atlassian in 2017 and beyond. Stella was an early champion of remote work, having led remote teams for the last decade plus.
Protocol | China

Livestreaming ecommerce next battleground for China’s nationalists

Vendors for Nike and even Chinese brands were harassed for not donating enough to Henan.

Nationalists were trolling in the comment sections of livestream sessions selling products by Li-Ning, Adidas and other brands.

Collage: Weibo, Bilibili

The No. 1 rule of sales: Don't praise your competitor's product. Rule No. 2: When you are put to a loyalty test by nationalist trolls, forget the first rule.

While China continues to respond to the catastrophic flooding that has killed 99 and displaced 1.4 million people in the central province of Henan, a large group of trolls was busy doing something else: harassing ordinary sportswear sellers on China's livestream ecommerce platforms. Why? Because they determined that the brands being sold had donated too little, or too late, to the people impacted by floods.

Keep Reading Show less
Zeyi Yang
Zeyi Yang is a reporter with Protocol | China. Previously, he worked as a reporting fellow for the digital magazine Rest of World, covering the intersection of technology and culture in China and neighboring countries. He has also contributed to the South China Morning Post, Nikkei Asia, Columbia Journalism Review, among other publications. In his spare time, Zeyi co-founded a Mandarin podcast that tells LGBTQ stories in China. He has been playing Pokemon for 14 years and has a weird favorite pick.
Power

The video game industry is bracing for its Netflix and Spotify moment

Subscription gaming promises to upend gaming. The jury's out on whether that's a good thing.

It's not clear what might fall through the cracks if most of the biggest game studios transition away from selling individual games and instead embrace a mix of free-to-play and subscription bundling.

Image: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Subscription services are coming for the game industry, and the shift could shake up the largest and most lucrative entertainment sector in the world. These services started as small, closed offerings typically available on only a handful of hardware platforms. Now, they're expanding to mobile phones and smart TVs, and promising to radically change the economics of how games are funded, developed and distributed.

Of the biggest companies in gaming today, Amazon, Apple, Electronic Arts, Google, Microsoft, Nintendo, Nvidia, Sony and Ubisoft all operate some form of game subscription. Far and away the most ambitious of them is Microsoft's Xbox Game Pass, featuring more than 100 games for $9.99 a month and including even brand-new titles the day they release. As of January, Game Pass had more than 18 million subscribers, and Microsoft's aggressive investment in a subscription future has become a catalyst for an industrywide reckoning on the likelihood and viability of such a model becoming standard.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt
Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.
Protocol | Policy

Lina Khan wants to hear from you

The new FTC chair is trying to get herself, and the sometimes timid tech-regulating agency she oversees, up to speed while she still can.

Lina Khan is trying to push the FTC to corral tech companies

Photo: Graeme Jennings/AFP via Getty Images

"When you're in D.C., it's very easy to lose connection with the very real issues that people are facing," said Lina Khan, the FTC's new chair.

Khan made her debut as chair before the press on Wednesday, showing up to a media event carrying an old maroon book from the agency's library and calling herself a "huge nerd" on FTC history. She launched into explaining how much she enjoys the open commission meetings she's pioneered since taking over in June. That's especially true of the marathon public comment sessions that have wrapped up each of the two meetings so far.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories